Journalism in the Public Interest


Profile: Hoyle, Leslie Ann

This data was last updated in December 2009. Statuses may have since changed. Check the California's Board of Registered Nursing license database for the most current license statuses.

License: #430043

Current status: Revoked (read board documents)

A nurse's license is revoked and the individual no longer has the right to practice as an RN or to use the title.

This table shows the actions taken against this nurse, as well as the allegations included in the formal accusations filed by the board.

Days elapsed is a Los Angeles Times and ProPublica calculation referring to the amount of time that passed between the board's first public accusation against the nurse and the imposition of discipline.

Accusation Date Decision Date Days Elapsed Discipline Allegations
Jan. 24, 2008 Jun. 28, 2009 521 Revoked Criminal conviction(s) and on-the-job misconduct

Data last updated Dec. 26, 2009

The following entry on Hoyle, Leslie Ann is as it appeared on the Board of Registered Nursing's Web site. In some cases, the dates included in the board's log do not correspond with dates included in its official documents. In such cases, the Times and ProPublica used dates in those documents. The board's site at times omits some dates in a nurse's disciplinary history; those dates have been added above.

<h1>BOARD OF REGISTERED NURSING</h1> <p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table> <tr VALIGN="TOP"><td ALIGN="LEFT"><b>Licensee Name:</b></td><td ALIGN="LEFT">HOYLE LESLIE ANN</td></tr> <tr VALIGN="TOP"><td ALIGN="LEFT"><b>License Type:</b></td><td ALIGN="LEFT">Registered Nurse</td></tr> <tr VALIGN="TOP"><td ALIGN="LEFT"><b>License Number:</b></td><td ALIGN="LEFT">430043</td></tr> <tr VALIGN="TOP"><td ALIGN="LEFT"><b>License Status:</b></td><td ALIGN="LEFT">REVOKED </td></tr> <tr VALIGN="TOP"><td ALIGN="LEFT"><b>Expiration Date:</b></td><td ALIGN="LEFT">December 31, 2009</td></tr> <tr VALIGN="TOP"><td ALIGN="LEFT"><b>Issue Date:</b></td><td ALIGN="LEFT">January 01, 1988</td></tr> <tr VALIGN="TOP"><td ALIGN="LEFT"><b>County:</b></td><td ALIGN="LEFT">RIVERSIDE</td></tr> <tr VALIGN="TOP"><td ALIGN="LEFT"><b>Actions:</b></td><td ALIGN="LEFT">Yes</td></tr> </table> <p> </table> </p><p> </p><h2>Related Licenses/Registrations/Permits</h2> No records returned <p> </p><h2>Disciplinary Actions</h2> <tr> <td colspan="4" width="450">Public documents relating to this action are available here: </nobr><a href=""></a></td> </tr> <p> </p><p> </p><table> <tr> <td colspan="2">January 24, 2008</td> <td colspan="2">Accusation Filed</td> </tr><tr> <td colspan="2">June 28, 2009</td> <td colspan="2">Revocation</td> </tr></table> <p> </p><p> </p><table></td></table> <p> </p><p> <i><b>Disclaimer</b></i> <br /> <i>All information provided by the Department of Consumer Affairs on this web page, and on its other web pages and internet sites, is made available to provide immediate access for the convenience of interested persons. While the Department believes the information to be reliable, human or mechanical error remains a possibility, as does delay in the posting or updating of information. Therefore, the Department makes no guarantee as to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, currency, or correct sequencing of the information. Neither the Department, nor any of the sources of the information, shall be responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the use or results obtained from the use of this information. Other specific cautionary notices may be included on other web pages maintained by the Department. All access to and use of this web page and any other web page or internet site of the Department is governed by the Disclaimers and Conditions for Access and Use as set forth at </i> <i><a href="">California Department of Consumer Affairs' Disclaimer Information and Use Information.</a></i> </p><p> </p><p> </p> <p> </p>

Return to Nurse Database Main Page

Our Complete Coverage

  • The Los Angeles Times and ProPublica have conducted a joint investigation into the failed oversight of California's health professionals. In July 2009, we reported that the Board of Registered Nursing took more than three years, on average, to investigate and discipline errant nurses. It failed to act against nurses whose misconduct already had been thoroughly documented and sanctioned by others. And the board gave probation to hundreds of nurses – ordering monitoring and work restrictions – then failed to crack down as many landed in trouble again and again. Read our complete coverage here.

Our reporting recipe: We've written a guide to how we conducted our nurses investigation. Take a look for help in investigating your own state's regulatory boards.

Ask the reporters about the series: Email


  • California Sanctioned Nurse Database - The Los Angeles Times and ProPublica compiled a database of nearly 2,400 California nurses who have been sanctioned since 2002. Search the records of nurses who have faced disciplinary proceedings and the circumstances of allegations against them.



  • Spencer Sullivan
  • Spencer Sullivan - In the prime of his life, Spencer Sullivan was rendered a quadriplegic. It took the nursing board more than six years later to revoke the license of a nurse involved in his care. Read more | LA Times Audio Slideshow
  • Caitlin Greenwell
  • Caitlin Greenwell - Caitlin Greenwell's family alleges that she suffers from cerberal palsy because nurses neglected to monitor her during her birth. LA Times Audio Slideshow
  • Dr. Iraj Zandi
  • Dr. Iraj Zandi – During a surgery, Dr. Iraj Zandi discovered that a nurse had stolen painkiller drugs intended for his patient. He found out later that the nurse had been accused of pilfering drugs from a previous employer. Read more...
  • Veronica Glaubach
  • Veronica Glaubach – Veronica Glaubach’s nurses missed crucial signs of a life-threatening complication during and after childbirth, her family alleged. She died. The nursing board absolved the nurses. Read more...