Back to Map
FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITE INSTALLATION ID: CA99799F774300

BORREGO SPRINGS

borrego springs, California

Cost So Far

$3.17M

Money already spent on the evaluation and cleanup of hazardous sites.

Expected Additional Cost

$81.8M

The estimated amount of money needed for evaluation and cleanup of hazardous sites at this installation.

Expected Completion Date

2056

The date by which the DOD estimates cleanup of all sites will be complete. Long term monitoring may continue after this date.

The site comprises 256,000 acres.The Navy sites were predominantly used as various exercise and emergency landing strips.This permit exempted three areas: portion of Township 9 South, Range 9 East, lying between U.S. Highway No. 99 and the Santa... see more » The site comprises 256,000 acres.The Navy sites were predominantly used as various exercise and emergency landing strips.This permit exempted three areas: portion of Township 9 South, Range 9 East, lying between U.S. Highway No. 99 and the Santa Rosa Mountains (this area is an Indian Reservation); Benson's Dry Lake lying north of Ocotillo (Naval landing field); and area adjacent to western boundary, on which houses, fences and other improvements have been erected. his property is known or suspected to contain military munitions and explosives of concern (e.g., unexploded ordnance) and therefore may present an explosive hazard (Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) « see less

8 Hazardous Sites

Below are the locations of hazardous sites associated with this military installation, according to the DOD. A site’s contamination may affect a much larger area, including public and private lands and the water supplies beneath them.

High Risk

Medium Risk

Low Risk

Risk Not Evaluated or Not Required

Response Complete

We haven't independently confirmed the location of every site. If you notice a site placed at the incorrect location, please contact us.

Not all sites in the DOD data include location information, so there may be sites listed below that are missing from the map. The risk level of a site refers to a relative risk assessment made by the DOD to prioritize the cleanup of sites.

7 Active Sites

Sites where military cleanup actions are still ongoing. The risk level of a site refers to a relative risk assessment made by the DOD, which prioritizes the cleanup of sites that pose greatest threat to safety, human health, and the environment.

Site ID: 05OEW

BORREGO TARGET #64

Multi Use Range

Cost

$10.2M

Cost in 2015 plus expected future cost of cleanup

Final Cleanup Action

Sep 2051

This site is under ongoing monitoring until Sep 2080

Contaminated Areas

Soil: Low Risk

Contaminants: Barium 180.0 mg/kg Copper 190.0 mg/kg Lead 310.0 mg/kg Zinc 560.0 mg/kg Aluminum 15000.0 mg/kg

See more details...

Site ID: 03OEW

AREA E-1 NAVAL IMPACT AREA

Multi Use Range

Cost

$14.4M

Cost in 2015 plus expected future cost of cleanup

Final Cleanup Action

Sep 2054

This site is under ongoing monitoring until Sep 2083

Contaminated Areas

Soil: Low Risk

Contaminants: Antimony 0.048 mg/kg Copper 33.0 mg/kg Lead 94.0 mg/kg Zinc 120.0 mg/kg Barium 350.0 mg/kg Aluminum 35000.0 mg/kg

See more details...

Site ID: 06OEW

BOMBING TARGET BENSON

Air to Land

Cost

$6.22M

Cost in 2015 plus expected future cost of cleanup

Final Cleanup Action

Sep 2050

Contaminated Areas

Soil: Medium Risk

Contaminants: Lead 13.0 mg/kg Copper 26.0 mg/kg Zinc 88.0 mg/kg Aluminum 24000.0 mg/kg

See more details...

Site ID: 07OEW

AREA B FIRING RANGE

Multi Use Range

Cost

$8.56M

Cost in 2015 plus expected future cost of cleanup

Final Cleanup Action

Sep 2054

This site is under ongoing monitoring until Sep 2083

Contaminated Areas

Soil: Low Risk

Contaminants: Lead 6.7 mg/kg Copper 18.0 mg/kg Zinc 57.0 mg/kg Strontium 72.0 mg/kg Barium 190.0 mg/kg Aluminum 17000.0 mg/kg

See more details...

Site ID: 04OEW

BORREGO HOTEL

Air to Land

Cost

$3.07M

Cost in 2015 plus expected future cost of cleanup

Final Cleanup Action

Sep 2047

This site is under ongoing monitoring until Sep 2076

Contaminated Areas

Soil: Low Risk

Contaminants: Arsenic 2.9 mg/kg Total Chromium (1:6 ratio Cr VI:Cr III) 16.2 mg/kg Lead 25.1 mg/kg Copper 71.8 mg/kg

See more details...

Site ID: 08OEW

ARTILLERY IMPACT AREA

Multi Use Range

Cost

$26.4M

Cost in 2015 plus expected future cost of cleanup

Final Cleanup Action

Sep 2056

This site is under ongoing monitoring until Sep 2085

Contaminated Areas

Soil: Low Risk

Contaminants: Lead 9.1 mg/kg Copper 20.0 mg/kg Strontium 44.0 mg/kg Zinc 72.0 mg/kg Barium 240.0 mg/kg Aluminum 22000.0 mg/kg

See more details...

Site ID: 01OEW

AREA C FIRING RANGE

Multi Use Range

Cost

$13.1M

Cost in 2015 plus expected future cost of cleanup

Final Cleanup Action

Sep 2053

This site is under ongoing monitoring until Sep 2082

Contaminated Areas

Soil: Medium Risk

Contaminants: TNT (2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene) 0.0052 mg/kg Antimony 0.032 mg/kg Lead 4.2 mg/kg Copper 13.0 mg/kg Strontium 41.0 mg/kg Zinc 85.0 mg/kg Barium 330.0 mg/kg Aluminum 21000.0 mg/kg

See more details...

1 Inactive Site

Sites where military cleanup actions are complete, according to the DOD. Note that this status does not necessarily mean the site is no longer hazardous, as many of these sites are put under long-term monitoring or other restrictions.

Site ID: 02OEW

CAMP ENSIGN/DUMPSITE

Unexploded Munitions and Ordnance Area

Cost

Unknown

Final Cleanup Action

Sep 2011

Update (Dec. 5, 2017): We have changed the source of the installation cost data after being notified by the Department of Defense that they erroneously reported their own cost figures on the DERP website. We are now displaying the costs the department says are the most accurate available, from the Pentagon’s DERP database that we received in a FOIA request.

Note: The risk level of a site refers to a relative risk assessment made by the DOD to prioritize the cleanup of sites.

Data: All data comes from the Defense Environmental Restoration Program and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and will be released soon at the ProPublica Data Store. Read our methodology »