Back to Map
AIR FORCE INSTALLATION ID: VA357282490400

RICHMOND IAP BYRD FIELD

sandston, Virginia

Cost So Far

$8.98M

Money already spent on the evaluation and cleanup of hazardous sites.

Expected Additional Cost

$731K

The estimated amount of money needed for evaluation and cleanup of hazardous sites at this installation.

Completion Date

2018

The date the DOD says cleanup of all sites was completed. Long term monitoring may continue after this date.

6 Hazardous Sites

Below are the locations of hazardous sites associated with this military installation, according to the DOD. A site’s contamination may affect a much larger area, including public and private lands and the water supplies beneath them.

High Risk

Medium Risk

Low Risk

Risk Not Evaluated or Not Required

Response Complete

We haven't independently confirmed the location of every site. If you notice a site placed at the incorrect location, please contact us.

Not all sites in the DOD data include location information, so there may be sites listed below that are missing from the map. The risk level of a site refers to a relative risk assessment made by the DOD to prioritize the cleanup of sites.

1 Active Site

Sites where military cleanup actions are still ongoing. The risk level of a site refers to a relative risk assessment made by the DOD, which prioritizes the cleanup of sites that pose greatest threat to safety, human health, and the environment.

Site ID: SS001

HARDSTANDS (TCE)

Spill Site Area

Cost

$748K

Cost in 2015 plus expected future cost of cleanup

Final Cleanup Action

Dec 2016

This site is under ongoing monitoring until Sep 2022

Contaminated Areas

Groundwater: Medium Risk

Groundwater at Site 1 occurs as a semiconfined aquifer. The upper semiconfining unit acts as an aquitard resulting in localized perched water. (Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., March 1995, SI, p. 4-18) Public drinking water is taken from the James River and commercial wells downgradient of the base. These wells are not screened in the semiconfined surface aquifer. (Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., March 1995, SI, p. 1-23)

Contaminants: Chloroform 3.0 ug/L 1,2-Dichloroethylene (cis) 7.0 ug/L Copper and compounds 24.3 ug/L Benzene 30.0 ug/L Lead 37.2 ug/L Trichloroethylene (TCE) 180.0 ug/L 1,2-Dichloroethylene (Total) 290.0 ug/L

See more details...

5 Inactive Sites

Sites where military cleanup actions are complete, according to the DOD. Note that this status does not necessarily mean the site is no longer hazardous, as many of these sites are put under long-term monitoring or other restrictions.

Site ID: ST004

JP-4 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FILLLINE

Underground Storage Tanks

Cost

Unknown

Final Cleanup Action

Jan 1994

Contaminated Areas

Groundwater: Low Risk

Groundwater was not encountered in the UST removal operation at Site 4 because the locally semiconfining clay layer was not breached. (Advanced Sciences, Inc., April 1994, Closure Assessment Report, p. 57) The April 1994 Draft Closure Assessment Report concluded that the groundwater contamination at Site 4 is not likely to pose an immediate risk to human health. (Radian Corporation, August 1994, Management Action Plan, p. A-10)

Contaminants: Benzene 1800.0 ug/L Xylene (Mixed) 3500.0 ug/L Toluene 4000.0 ug/L

See more details...

Site ID: SS002

BOWSER HOLDING AREA

Storage Area

Cost

Unknown

Final Cleanup Action

Feb 2001

Contaminated Areas

Groundwater: Low Risk

Deleted zinc because its concentration was within background levels. Groundwater at Site 2 occurs as a semiconfined aquifer. The semiconfining unit acts as an aquitard (to contain perched water). (Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., March 1995, SI, p. 4-29) Public drinking water is taken from the James River and commercial wells downgradient of the base. These wells are not screened in the semiconfined surface aquifer. (Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., March 1995, SI, pp. 1-21, 1-23)

Contaminants: Copper and compounds 13.5 ug/L

See more details...

Site ID: SS003

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE WASTE STORAGE AREA

Storage Area

Cost

Unknown

Final Cleanup Action

Sep 2001

Contaminated Areas

Groundwater: Medium Risk

Groundwater at Site 3 occurs as a semiconfined aquifer. The semiconfining unit acts as an aquitard and contains perched water. The presence of benzene suggests that contaminants have migrated into groundwater. (Metcalf and Eddy, March 1995, SI Report, pp. Public drinking water is taken from the James River and commercial wells downgradient of the base. These wells are not screened in the semiconfined surface aquifer. (Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., March 1995, SI, p. 1-23)

Contaminants: Benzene 5.8 ug/L Beryllium and compounds 11.4 ug/L Cadmium and compounds 19.8 ug/L Lead 20.9 ug/L Chromium 125.0 ug/L Vanadium 200.0 ug/L

See more details...

Site ID: SS006

OLD WWII HANGAR

Spill Site Area

Cost

Unknown

Final Cleanup Action

Feb 2001

Contaminated Areas

Groundwater: Low Risk

Ethylbenzene was detected in a monitoring well approximately 40' downgradient of the site. (Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., March 1995, SI, pp. 4-55, 4-62) Public drinking water is taken from the James River and commercial wells downgradient of the base. These wells are not screened in the semiconfined surface aquifer. (Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., March 1995, SI, p. 1-23)

Contaminants: Zinc 53.2 ug/L

Soil: Low Risk

Lead is above background levels and cadmium is present in concentrations three times greater than background at one surface soil location. (Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., March 1995, SI, p. 4-63) The area is grass covered except for the liquid oxygen area, which consists of a concrete slab, a short asphalt paved road, and a fence. Workers installing the fence noticed petroleum odors in some post holes. The site is partially surrounded by the fence

Contaminants: 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.0e-07 mg/kg 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 2.4e-05 mg/kg Chrysene 0.0022 mg/kg Pyrene 0.0033 mg/kg Arsenic 0.004 mg/kg Fluoranthene 0.004200000000000001 mg/kg Cadmium and compounds 0.0078 mg/kg Chromium 0.033299999999999996 mg/kg Zinc 0.0375 mg/kg Lead 0.133 mg/kg

See more details...

Site ID: ST005

BATTERY 3-UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS FUEL FARM

Underground Tank Farm

Cost

Unknown

Final Cleanup Action

Jan 1994

Contaminated Areas

Groundwater: Low Risk

Groundwater was not encountered in the UST removal operation at Site 5 because the locally semiconfining clay layer was not breached. (Advanced Sciences, Inc., April 1994, Closure Assessment Report, p. 57) The April 1994 Draft Closure Assessment Report concluded that the groundwater contamination at Site 5 is not likely to pose an immediate risk to human health. (Radian Corporation, August 1994, Management Action Plan, p. A-12)

Contaminants: Lead 62.0 ug/L Benzene 87.5 ug/L

See more details...

Update (Dec. 5, 2017): We have changed the source of the installation cost data after being notified by the Department of Defense that they erroneously reported their own cost figures on the DERP website. We are now displaying the costs the department says are the most accurate available, from the Pentagon’s DERP database that we received in a FOIA request.

Note: The risk level of a site refers to a relative risk assessment made by the DOD to prioritize the cleanup of sites.

Data: All data comes from the Defense Environmental Restoration Program and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and will be released soon at the ProPublica Data Store. Read our methodology »