Dollars for Profs

Dig Into University Researchers' Outside Income and Conflicts of Interest

Published Dec. 6, 2019

This database was last updated in December 2019 and should only be used as a historical snapshot. There may be new or amended records not reflected here.

Financial doc
Filing Type

Conflict of Interest

Institutions must file significant disclosures to the National Institutes of Health if they determine financial relationships could affect the design, conduct or reporting of the NIH-funded research. The NIH provided us with their entire financial conflict of interest database, with filings from 2012 through 2019.

Should you be removed from our database? Contact us at [email protected]. Read more below.

James Heath

California Institute of Technology, Department: None

Should you be removed from our database? Contact us at [email protected]. Read more below.

Disclosed Conflict of Interest with

InDi Molecular

Disclosed Value
Listed Reason
Payment for services (e.g., consulting fees, honoraria, paid authorship)

InDi Molecular is commercializing the PCC technology, and has licensed intellectual property (IP) from Caltech related to PCCs. The PCC technology is a molecular platform for building peptide ligands that bind to specific locations (epitopes) of specific protein targets. Those targets may be protein biomarker diagnostic targets, or they may be protein drug targets, as examples.

The PCC technology is being utilized in Project 2 of the NSBCC grant for the purposes of drugging certain oncoproteins, which are proteins that contain at least one point mutation, and, because of that point mutation, are known to promote certain cancers. The Heath lab has recently published a paper with InDi Molecular in this field in Nature Chemistry. That paper represented a technology demonstration, not a demonstration of a viable drug candidate. That PCC was only cell-penetrating with the addition of what is known as a cell penetrating peptide, which would rule out its use as a drug. AktE17K, the subject of the Nature Chemistry paper, is also a very rare oncoprotein, and so is not a viable candidate for commercialization. As such, that project will not be moving forward other than for purposes of scientific demonstrations. This is clearly indicated in the NSBCC grant Project 2. Project 2 is, instead, focused on developing an inhibitor to the KRASG12D oncoprotein, which is the most common oncoprotein in cancer. That inhibitor is a joint effort between the Deshaies, Davis, and the Heath labs. Any future commercialization of drugs that are developed through Project 2 would almost certainly require background Intellectual Property (IP) to which InDi Molecular has rights, and thus InDi Molecular has the potential to benefit from work done within the NSBCC. InDi Molecular no longer has Improvement rights with regard to this IP. The management plan for this conflict of interest with regard to collaboration and IP is attached.

Listed Research Project
Nanosystems Biology Cancer Center

The importance of the NSBCC project to human health Once a patient's cancer has advanced beyond a surgical cure, no single available therapy has shown efficacy for promoting a durable and long-term remission. Of course, the standard combinations of radiation and chemotherapy provide a more effective treatment than either one alone, but modern cancer therapy presents a host of less toxic and more promising therapies, in the form of targeted inhibitors and immunotherapies. Immunotherapies, in particular, have been in the news recently because of the remarkable success they have had in providing certain classes of cancer patients with durable responses, while at the same time being relatively well-tolerated. However, even for those therapies, the responding patient populations, and the cancer class that can be treated, are highly selective. Identifying and delivering effective combination immunotherapies or combination targeted therapies has thus emerged as a very significant challenge in clinical cancer care. The proposed NSBCC has four highly complementary scientific projects that are specifically aimed at developing nanotechnologies that can help identify or deliver effective therapy combinations for both targeted inhibitors and cancer immunotherapies. The project is strongly connected to clinical programs to help ensure effective clinical translation.

Filed on January 08, 2016.

Tell us what you know about James Heath's disclosure

We're still reporting about conflicts of interest. Is there something you'd like to tell us about this disclosure?

Name Institution Type Company Disclosed Value
James Heath California Institute of Technology Conflict of Interest Isoplexis $10,000 - $19,999
James Heath California Institute of Technology Conflict of Interest PACT Pharma $10,000 - $19,999
James Heath California Institute of Technology Conflict of Interest InDi Molecular $5,000 - $9,999
James Heath California Institute of Technology Conflict of Interest Isoplexis $0 - $4,999
James Heath California Institute of Technology Conflict of Interest Sofie Biosciences $0 - $4,999
James Heath California Institute of Technology Conflict of Interest PACT Pharma $0 - $4,999
James Heath California Institute of Technology Conflict of Interest Sofie Biosciences $0 - $4,999
James Heath California Institute of Technology Conflict of Interest InDi Molecular $0 - $4,999
If you see an error in the database or a reason we should not disclose a record, please contact us at [email protected] and we'll evaluate it on a case-by-case basis.
Sources: National Institutes of Health, public records requests filed at multiple public state universities

Notes: When a more specific filing date is not available for an individual financial disclosure or conflict of interest form, we use the year the form was filed. If the year was not disclosed, we report the range of years covered by our public records requests. In a few cases, a start date was provided instead of a filing date. In those cases, we use the start date instead.

Fewer than 10% of records from the University of Florida and fewer than 1% of records from the University of Texas system were removed because they did not contain enough information.

ProPublica obtained additional financial disclosures and conflict of interest forms that we have not yet digitized and added to the database. You can download those disclosures in the ProPublica Data Store.

Close Comment Creative Commons Donate Email Facebook Mobile Phone Podcast Print RSS Search Search Twitter WhatsApp
Current site Current page