Dollars for Profs
Dig Into University Researchers' Outside Income and Conflicts of Interest
Published Dec. 6, 2019
This database was last updated in December 2019 and should only be used as a historical snapshot. There may be new or amended records not reflected here.
Conflict of Interest
Institutions must file significant disclosures to the National Institutes of Health if they determine financial relationships could affect the design, conduct or reporting of the NIH-funded research. The NIH provided us with their entire financial conflict of interest database, with filings from 2012 through 2019.
Should you be removed from our database? Contact us at [email protected]. Read more below.
Shridar Ganesan
Rbhs Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Department: None
Should you be removed from our database? Contact us at [email protected]. Read more below.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Other : Other: Dr. Ganesan holds intellectual property rights on patents held by Rutgers, The State University New Jersey (awardee institution) on methods for image analysis of histology of ER+ breast cancers for prognosis. These patents do not have any IP value at this time.
Other: Dr. Ganesan holds intellectual property rights on patents held by Rutgers, The State University New Jersey (awardee institution) on methods for image analysis of histology of ER+ breast cancers for prognosis. These patents do not have any IP value at this time. Since one of the patents contains language that includes analysis of tissue microarrays and the current study will use tissue arrays to assess expression patterns in various types of tissue, the ICOI Committee concluded that there was the perception of a conflict of interest on the part of Dr. Ganesan. Note that this disclosure is updated from disclosures previously submitted on 10/23/2013, 7/28/2014, 8/18/2015 due to an update in the format of disclosures.
Image Mining for Comparative Analysis of Expression Patterns in Tissue Microarray
PROJECT NARRATIVE: During the first phase of this research project our team successfully designed, developed and evaluated (a) a library of analytical and computational tools for performing automated registration, segmentation, feature extraction, and classification of imaged microtissue samples; (b) data models and grid-enabled tools for performing large-scale indexing, organizing, and archiving imaged microscopy specimens and experimental results; (c) query capabilities to support reliable identification and retrieval of those imaged tissue samples from within distributed, 'gold-standard' archives of consensus-graded cases which exhibit staining and expression signatures which are most similar to those of a given query; and (d) methods and resources to support seamless, high-throughput analyses of specimens. The overarching goals of this renewal application are to build upon progress made in the first phase of the project by developing and evaluating a new family of multi-stage, searching algorithms to facilitate quick, reliable interrogation of large-scale, clinical and research, microscopy applications including whole-slide imaging and tissue microarray; developing and evaluating a suite of high-throughput services capable of automatically detecting, archiving and indexing user-specified objects (e.g. tissues, cells) in large collections of images and implement extensions to the data models and support for optimized pipeline selection. These capabilities will enable large-scale correlative outcomes studies and support expansion of the 'gold-standard' image archives and correlated clinical repositories. The services will take advantage of state-of-the-art parallel CPU-GPU machines and the searching algorithms described in Aim 1; optimizing the imaging, computational and content-based image retrieval algorithms and tools using a wide range of different tissues, cancer types and biomarkers to support clinical and research experiments and studies involving patient stratification, quality-control, and outcomes assessment; and deploying the analytical tools, data models, user-centered interfaces and reference libraries of imaged specimens to participating adopter sites to conduct open-set usability and performance studies and make these resources available to the clinical and research communities as open source software and resources to support future development and testing of new hypotheses, algorithms and methods.
Filed on September 29, 2015.
Tell us what you know about Shridar Ganesan's disclosure
We're still reporting about conflicts of interest. Is there something you'd like to tell us about this disclosure?
Other search results for: “Shridar Ganesan”
Name | Institution | Type | Company | Disclosed Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Shridar Ganesan | Rbhs Cancer Institute of New Jersey | Conflict of Interest | IBRIS Inc. | $0 - $4,999 |
Shridar Ganesan | Rbhs Cancer Institute of New Jersey | Conflict of Interest | Ibris Inc | Value cannot be readily determined |
Shridar Ganesan | Case Western Reserve University | Conflict of Interest | Inspirata, Inc. | Value cannot be readily determined |
Shridar Ganesan | Rbhs Cancer Institute of New Jersey | Conflict of Interest | Inspirata Inc | $40,000 - $59,999 |
Shridar Ganesan | Rutgers, the State Univ of n.j. | Conflict of Interest | Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey | Value cannot be readily determined |
Shridar Ganesan | Rutgers, the State Univ of n.j. | Conflict of Interest | Ibris Inc | Value cannot be readily determined |
Shridar Ganesan | Case Western Reserve University | Conflict of Interest | Inspirata, Inc. | $60,000 - $79,999 |
Notes: When a more specific filing date is not available for an individual financial disclosure or conflict of interest form, we use the year the form was filed. If the year was not disclosed, we report the range of years covered by our public records requests. In a few cases, a start date was provided instead of a filing date. In those cases, we use the start date instead.
Fewer than 10% of records from the University of Florida and fewer than 1% of records from the University of Texas system were removed because they did not contain enough information.
ProPublica obtained additional financial disclosures and conflict of interest forms that we have not yet digitized and added to the database. You can download those disclosures in the ProPublica Data Store.