Dollars for Profs

Dig Into University Researchers' Outside Income and Conflicts of Interest

Published Dec. 6, 2019

This database was last updated in December 2019 and should only be used as a historical snapshot. There may be new or amended records not reflected here.

Financial doc
Filing Type

Conflict of Interest

Institutions must file significant disclosures to the National Institutes of Health if they determine financial relationships could affect the design, conduct or reporting of the NIH-funded research. The NIH provided us with their entire financial conflict of interest database, with filings from 2012 through 2019.

Should you be removed from our database? Contact us at [email protected]. Read more below.

David Alland

Rbhs New Jersey Medical School, Department: Internal Medicine/medicine

Should you be removed from our database? Contact us at [email protected]. Read more below.

Disclosed Conflict of Interest with

Cepheid Inc

Disclosed Value
Listed Reason
Intellectual property rights (e.g., royalties, patents, copyrights) not from the awardee Institution

Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay is a PCR-based assay used for automated TB detection and detection of resistance to the drug Rifampicin (RIF). However drug resistance detection is limited to identifying patients who potentially have MDR, but cannot tell whether a patient with RIF resistance remains INH-susceptible, and thus could still be treated with an INH-containing regime. Nor can it identify which RIF-resistant patients can be treated with a FQ and/or aminoglycoside as opposed to those who have XDR TB. Thus, patients are at risk for being either over treated or undertreated, with potentially serious consequences. Furthermore, patients with undiagnosed XDR can remain infectious for prolonged periods, further spreading their disease. This grant funds the development of a new “Xtend-XDR” assay that will complement the current Xpert assay, making it possible to select appropriate treatment (and infection control) approaches in patients identified with TB. The Xpert assay is marketed by Cepheid and based on RU patents. Cepheid pays licensing fees to RU as part of a patent pool for the use of molecular beacon technology patented by Rutgers. In addition, there are two pending Rutgers University patent applications on probes and primers to detect drug resistance in Mtb. Some of the probes and primers are being used in the assay being developed in the current study. Dr. Alland benefits from the development of this technology through his share of license fees paid to Rutgers on his behalf.

Listed Research Project
Pre-clinical Development of an Advanced Genexpert Test for Drug Resistant Mtb

Drug resistant tuberculosis is an increasing problem and the pathogen can rapidly kill people if not properly treated. This project will result in the development of a new test that will make it very easy to rapidly find out who has drug resistant tuberculosis and which drugs would be the best ones used in treatment.

Filed on October 26, 2015.

Tell us what you know about David Alland's disclosure

We're still reporting about conflicts of interest. Is there something you'd like to tell us about this disclosure?

Name Institution Type Company Disclosed Value
David Alland Rbhs New Jersey Medical School Conflict of Interest Cepheid Inc $20,000 - $39,999
David Alland Rbhs New Jersey Medical School Conflict of Interest Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey $0 - $4,999
If you see an error in the database or a reason we should not disclose a record, please contact us at [email protected] and we'll evaluate it on a case-by-case basis.
Sources: National Institutes of Health, public records requests filed at multiple public state universities

Notes: When a more specific filing date is not available for an individual financial disclosure or conflict of interest form, we use the year the form was filed. If the year was not disclosed, we report the range of years covered by our public records requests. In a few cases, a start date was provided instead of a filing date. In those cases, we use the start date instead.

Fewer than 10% of records from the University of Florida and fewer than 1% of records from the University of Texas system were removed because they did not contain enough information.

ProPublica obtained additional financial disclosures and conflict of interest forms that we have not yet digitized and added to the database. You can download those disclosures in the ProPublica Data Store.

Close Comment Creative Commons Donate Email Facebook Mobile Phone Podcast Print RSS Search Search Twitter WhatsApp
Current site Current page