Dollars for Profs

Dig Into University Researchers' Outside Income and Conflicts of Interest

Published Dec. 6, 2019

This database was last updated in December 2019 and should only be used as a historical snapshot. There may be new or amended records not reflected here.

Financial doc
Filing Type

Conflict of Interest

Institutions must file significant disclosures to the National Institutes of Health if they determine financial relationships could affect the design, conduct or reporting of the NIH-funded research. The NIH provided us with their entire financial conflict of interest database, with filings from 2012 through 2019.

Should you be removed from our database? Contact us at [email protected]. Read more below.

Karl Kelsey

Tufts University Boston, Department: Public Health & Prev Medicine

Should you be removed from our database? Contact us at [email protected]. Read more below.

Disclosed Conflict of Interest with

Celintec

Disclosed Value
Listed Reason
Equity Interest - Non-publicly traded entity ( e.g., stock, stock option, or other ownership interest)

Brown’s Conflict of Interest Review Board reviewed Dr. Kelsey’s SFI in Celintec in connection with the R01 grant referenced above. Celintec a privately held start-up company that was founded in an effort to commercialize a method, developed by Brown, to utilize DNA methylation signatures to infer immune profiles from peripheral blood. The chief IP relates to the software to deconvolute DNA methylation data to cell subtype. Potential uses include immune monitoring for clinical trials, or targeted clinical applications where conventional immune profiling with flow cytometry is difficult or impossible. The company is attempting to commercialize methods that identify biomarkers of immune response primarily in cancer.

The COI Review Board determined that Dr. Kelsey’s SFI is related to the research proposed under the R01 grant. The award is similar, in that it has the goal of developing methylation marks of specific cell types that predict response to treatment and outcome. As better immune biomarkers are developed, they could be commercialized by Celintec. Given the type and level of his SFI, the COI Board further determined that Dr. Kelsey’s SFI could directly and significantly affect the design, conduct, or reporting of the research; that is, his SFI creates an FCOI requiring management.

Listed Research Project
Prospective immune profiling using methylation markers and pancreatic cancer risk

PROJECT NARRATIVE Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the US and is the most rapidly fatal cancer. Early detection is critical for improving prognosis and survival from this disease given that treatment is purely palliative for patients diagnosed late in the progression of the disease. Studies, including ours, suggest that the immune response plays an important role in carcinogenesis; in this proposal, we propose to use DNA methylation markers to identify immune profiles predictive of pancreatic cancer risk.

Filed on December 11, 2018.

Tell us what you know about Karl Kelsey's disclosure

We're still reporting about conflicts of interest. Is there something you'd like to tell us about this disclosure?

Name Institution Type Company Disclosed Value
Karl Kelsey University of California, San Francisco Conflict of Interest Cellintec $0 - $4,999
Karl Kelsey Dartmouth College Conflict of Interest Celintec Value cannot be readily determined
Karl Kelsey Columbia University Health Sciences Conflict of Interest Celintec Value cannot be readily determined
If you see an error in the database or a reason we should not disclose a record, please contact us at [email protected] and we'll evaluate it on a case-by-case basis.
Sources: National Institutes of Health, public records requests filed at multiple public state universities

Notes: When a more specific filing date is not available for an individual financial disclosure or conflict of interest form, we use the year the form was filed. If the year was not disclosed, we report the range of years covered by our public records requests. In a few cases, a start date was provided instead of a filing date. In those cases, we use the start date instead.

Fewer than 10% of records from the University of Florida and fewer than 1% of records from the University of Texas system were removed because they did not contain enough information.

ProPublica obtained additional financial disclosures and conflict of interest forms that we have not yet digitized and added to the database. You can download those disclosures in the ProPublica Data Store.

Close Comment Creative Commons Donate Email Facebook Mobile Phone Podcast Print RSS Search Search Twitter WhatsApp
Current site Current page