ER Inspector MT SINAI HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTERMT SINAI HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER

ER Inspector

Find and Evaluate Every Emergency Room Near You

Updated September 19, 2019

This database was last updated in September 2019. It should only be used as a historical snapshot.Researchers can find more recent data on timely and effective care in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospitals datasets and guidance about hospital regulations.

If you are having a heart attack or life-threatening emergency, call 911.

ER Inspector » Illinois » MT SINAI HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER

Don’t see your ER? Find out why it might be missing.

MT SINAI HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER

15th street at california, chicago, Ill. 60608

(773) 542-2000

46% of Patients Would "Definitely Recommend" this Hospital
(Ill. Avg: 70%)

3 violations related to ER care since 2015

Hospital Type

Acute Care Hospitals

Hospital Owner

Voluntary non-profit - Private

ER Volume

High (40K - 60K patients a year)

See this hospital's CMS profile page or inspection reports.

Patient Pathways Through This ER

After a patient arrives at the emergency room, they are typically seen by a doctor or medical practitioner and then either sent home or admitted to the hospital and taken to a room. A small percentage of patients leave without being seen. The chart below shows on average how long each of these pathways take. Lower numbers are better, and all times refer to the average length of time people waited.

Arrives at ER
2% of patients leave without being seen
6hrs 47min Admitted to hospital
9hrs 56min Taken to room
3hrs 35min Sent home

All wait times are average.

Detailed Quality Measures

Here is a more in depth look at each quality measure, compared to state and national averages for hospitals with high ER volumes. Experts caution that very small differences between hospitals for a given measure are unlikely to correspond to noticeable differences in the real world.

Measure
Average for this Hospital
How this Hospital Compares

(to other hospitals with similar
ER volumes, when available)

Discharged Patients
Time Until Sent Home

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being sent home (if not admitted).

3hrs 35min
National Avg.
2hrs 42min
Ill. Avg.
2hrs 52min
This Hospital
3hrs 35min
Impatient Patients
Left Without
Being Seen

Percentage of patients who left the emergency room without being seen by a doctor or medical practitioner.

2%
Avg. U.S. Hospital
2%
Avg. Ill. Hospital
2%
This Hospital
2%
Admitted Patients
Time Before Admission

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being admitted to the hospital.

6hrs 47min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
5hrs 4min
Ill. Avg.
5hrs 10min
This Hospital
6hrs 47min
Admitted Patients
Transfer Time

Among patients admitted, additional time they spent waiting before being taken to their room (sometimes referred to as "boarding time.")

3hrs 9min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
2hrs 2min
Ill. Avg.
1hr 57min
This Hospital
3hrs 9min
Special Patients
CT Scan

Percentage of patients who arrived with stroke symptoms and did not receive brain scan results within 45 mins.

33%
National Avg.
27%
Ill. Avg.
22%
This Hospital
33%

Violations Related to ER Care

Problems found in emergency rooms at this hospital since 2015, as identified during the investigation of a complaint. About This Data →

Violation
Full Text
COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24

Jan 21, 2016

Based on document review and interview, it was determined the Hospital failed to ensure compliance with 42 CFR 489.20 and 42 CFR 489.24.

See More ↓

Based on document review and interview, it was determined the Hospital failed to ensure compliance with 42 CFR 489.20 and 42 CFR 489.24. Findings include: 1. The Hospital failed to ensure a patient who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) was captured in the ED Central log. (Refer to tag A 2405) 2. The Hospital failed to provide a medical screening examination. Refer to tag A 2406.

See Less ↑
EMERGENCY ROOM LOG

Jan 21, 2016

Based on document review and interview, it was determined that for 1 of 20 (Pt.

See More ↓

Based on document review and interview, it was determined that for 1 of 20 (Pt. #1) sampled patients, the Hospital failed to ensure a patient who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) was captured in the ED log. Finding include: 1. Pt #1 was a [AGE] year old male who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) on 7/27/14 and was greeted at 6:32 AM with a complaint of chronic pain. The record of the presentation contained an account number and the "Greeter Assessment" was completed to include vital signs (B/P, pulse, respiration, temperature, and Oxygen at 98 %). The record did not include any additional documentation in regards to this visit. 2. On 1/20/16 at 1:15 PM the Unit Director of Emergency Department (E #4) presented the ED log for the date of 7/27/14. Pt#1 could not be found in this log. 3. On 1/20/16 at 1:20 PM E #4 stated there is no ED log policy, although the Hospital maintains an ED log. E #4 stated the patients are entered in the log after they are triaged. E #4 stated this is the reason why Pt. #1 could not be found in the log. On 1/21/16, at 11:30 AM after reexamining their ED log, E #4 stated that Pt. #1 should have been found in the log but did not know why once the log was archived Pt #1 was not included in the log.

See Less ↑
MEDICAL SCREENING EXAM

Jan 21, 2016

Based on document review and interview, it was determined that for 1(Pt #1) of 20 sampled patients who presented in the Emergency Department (ED), the Hospital failed to provide a medical screening examination (MSE). Finding include: 1.

See More ↓

Based on document review and interview, it was determined that for 1(Pt #1) of 20 sampled patients who presented in the Emergency Department (ED), the Hospital failed to provide a medical screening examination (MSE). Finding include: 1. Policy entitled "Transfer of Patients from the Emergency Department" (Revised 6/2014) indicated "Procedure: 1. Medical Screening Examination: All individuals who come to the Emergency Department...will be provided the opportunity to receive a medical screening examination.... A mid-level provider or physician may perform the medical screening examination." 2 On 1/21/16 the The "Medical Staff Bylaws" (Revised 2013) and the Rules and Regulation (Revised 5/2012) were reviewed. These documents failed to designate or identify the qualified medical personnel who can provide the MSE, nor did it define who are the mid-level providers to perform the MSE in the ED, as stated in the policy. 3. Pt #1 was a [AGE] year old male (MDS) dated [DATE] at 6:35 AM with a complaint of chronic pain. A "Greeter Assessment" was completed that contained Pt #1's vital signs (temperature 37.3 Celsius, respirations 18, blood pressure 175/113, pulse 105 and pulse oximetry of 98%) and a past medical history of hypertension, and diabetes. No additional documentation was included in this chart for this visit. Subsequently, Pt #1 was not triaged nor received a medical screening examination (MSE). The "Patient Audit Trail" for this visit (7/27/14) indicated Pt#1's reason for visit to the ED was "Body Pain". On 7/27/14 at 6:57 AM the audit reflects the status event was edited "Checked-In /Pre-Registered Canceled". This audit does not reflect the reason why it was canceled. 4. On 1/21/16 at approximately 9:42 AM the Emergency Department Chairman (MD #4) was interviewed. MD #4 stated it is the expectation that every patient that presents to the ED is seen by a physician and/or midlevel provider for a medical screening examination (MSE) to determine the process to follow for the treatment of the patient. 5. On 1/21/16 at 10:00 AM the Director of the Emergency Department (E #4) was interviewed. E #4 stated the staff is also required to document the attempts of when the patient was called to be triaged. E #4 stated the staff are also required to document if the patient left without being seen. E #4 stated the staff failed to document what happened to this patient after he was greeted.

See Less ↑
Notes

“Average time” refers to the median wait time (the midpoint of all patients' wait times). References to “doctor or medical practitioner” indicate a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. CMS reports the CT scan quality measure as the percentage of patients who received a scan within 45 minutes. We have reversed that measure so that all measures follow a “lower is better” pattern.

Additional design and development by Mike Tigas and Sisi Wei.

Sources

All data comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Detailed quality measures at the hospital, state and national level were last updated September 2019. Most data was collected between October 2017 and October 2018. Data on ER-related violations is from January 2015 to June 2019.

Additional Info

How We've Updated ER Inspector | Download ProPublica's Emergency Room Planning Toolkit | About This Data

Don’t See Your ER?

In some cases we aren’t able to identify the exact location of a hospital, so it doesn’t appear on our mapped search results. However, it may still be in our database – try looking for it in the list of hospitals on each state's page.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from our database because it doesn't have an emergency department.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from the federal government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data. There are a couple of reasons why a hospital isn’t included in CMS data: it may not participate in Medicare, or it may share a certification number with another hospital (common across large hospital systems).

If you notice a hospital missing from our database, please first check if you can find it on CMS' website, and that it is listed as having an ER. If so, please email us with the hospital name and address.