ER Inspector THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTERTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER

ER Inspector

Find and Evaluate Every Emergency Room Near You

Updated September 19, 2019

This database was last updated in September 2019. It should only be used as a historical snapshot.Researchers can find more recent data on timely and effective care in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospitals datasets and guidance about hospital regulations.

If you are having a heart attack or life-threatening emergency, call 911.

ER Inspector » Illinois » THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER

Don’t see your ER? Find out why it might be missing.

THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER

5841 south maryland, chicago, Ill. 60637

(773) 702-1000

77% of Patients Would "Definitely Recommend" this Hospital
(Ill. Avg: 70%)

3 violations related to ER care since 2015

Hospital Type

Acute Care Hospitals

Hospital Owner

Voluntary non-profit - Private

ER Volume

Very high (60K+ patients a year)

See this hospital's CMS profile page or inspection reports.

Patient Pathways Through This ER

After a patient arrives at the emergency room, they are typically seen by a doctor or medical practitioner and then either sent home or admitted to the hospital and taken to a room. A small percentage of patients leave without being seen. The chart below shows on average how long each of these pathways take. Lower numbers are better, and all times refer to the average length of time people waited.

Arrives at ER
6% of patients leave without being seen
7hrs 18min Admitted to hospital
10hrs 24min Taken to room
3hrs 40min Sent home

All wait times are average.

Detailed Quality Measures

Here is a more in depth look at each quality measure, compared to state and national averages for hospitals with very high ER volumes. Experts caution that very small differences between hospitals for a given measure are unlikely to correspond to noticeable differences in the real world.

Measure
Average for this Hospital
How this Hospital Compares

(to other hospitals with similar
ER volumes, when available)

Discharged Patients
Time Until Sent Home

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being sent home (if not admitted).

3hrs 40min
National Avg.
2hrs 50min
Ill. Avg.
2hrs 56min
This Hospital
3hrs 40min
Impatient Patients
Left Without
Being Seen

Percentage of patients who left the emergency room without being seen by a doctor or medical practitioner.

6%
Avg. U.S. Hospital
2%
Avg. Ill. Hospital
2%
This Hospital
6%
Admitted Patients
Time Before Admission

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being admitted to the hospital.

7hrs 18min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
5hrs 33min
Ill. Avg.
4hrs 40min
This Hospital
7hrs 18min
Admitted Patients
Transfer Time

Among patients admitted, additional time they spent waiting before being taken to their room (sometimes referred to as "boarding time.")

3hrs 6min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
2hrs 24min
Ill. Avg.
1hr 56min
This Hospital
3hrs 6min
Special Patients
CT Scan

Percentage of patients who arrived with stroke symptoms and did not receive brain scan results within 45 mins.

No Data Available

Results are not available for this reporting period.

National Avg.
27%
Ill. Avg.
22%
This Hospital
No Data Available

Violations Related to ER Care

Problems found in emergency rooms at this hospital since 2015, as identified during the investigation of a complaint. About This Data →

Violation
Full Text
COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24

Mar 3, 2016

Based on document review and interview, it was determined for 2 of 22 clinical records reviewed, (Pt.

See More ↓

Based on document review and interview, it was determined for 2 of 22 clinical records reviewed, (Pt. #1 and #8) the Hospital failed to ensure compliance with 42 CFR 489.24. Findings include: 1. The Hospital failed to provide a medical screening examination. Refer to tag A 2406. 2. The Hospital failed to ensure transfer requirements were completed prior to transfering a patient to receiving hospital. Refer to A 2409.

See Less ↑
MEDICAL SCREENING EXAM

Mar 3, 2016

Based on document review and interview, it was determined that for 1(Pt #1) of 22 sampled patients who presented in the Emergency Department (ED), the Hospital failed to provide a medical screening examination (MSE). Findings include: 1.

See More ↓

Based on document review and interview, it was determined that for 1(Pt #1) of 22 sampled patients who presented in the Emergency Department (ED), the Hospital failed to provide a medical screening examination (MSE). Findings include: 1. The Medical Staff Bylaws (revised 2/2015) indicated "4.3 A. 14 b.The initial medical screening examinations for persons presenting in the Emergency Department may be performed by a physician member of the Medical Staff or House Staff or by a physician assistant, advanced practice nurse or any other qualified practitioner within his or her credentials... " 2. The policy entitled " Triage " (Revised 11/2015) indicated " Goals H ...Patient should be reassessed at appropriate intervals while waiting to be taken to the treatment area. Any significant symptoms should be reassessed for change and acuity category change as indicated. " 3. Pt #1 was a [AGE] year old male that arrived to the Emergency Department (ED) via ambulance on 2/23/16 at 5:57 PM for medical evaluation. Pt #1's chief compliant was diarrhea and back pain. Pt #1's vital signs were as follows: Temperature 98.4 Fahrenheit, pulse 93, espiration 18, blood pressure 106/78, pulse oximetry (oxygen level in the blood) 97% . A pain score of 10 (with 10 being the worst pain) was documented with the triage at 5:57 PM, and Pt #1 was moved to the waiting room. Pt #1's ESI (Emergency Severity Index) score upon arrival was a 3 (urgent). After triage, it was changed to a score of 4 (non-urgent). Pt #1's clinical record indicated the Registered Nurse (E #4) was assigned to reassess patients while waiting for medical examination. E #4 called Pt #1 for a reassessment on two different occasions, 8:33 PM and 11:15 PM and documented "no response" from Pt #1. On 2/24/16 at 2:41 AM the Registered Nurse (E#5) documented Pt #1 left without being seen (LWBS). 4. On 3/2/16 at approximately at 10:00 AM the Registered Nurse (E #2) was interviewed. E #2 stated it was not clear based on documentation why Pt #1's acuity status changed from a level 3 (urgent) to a 4 (non-urgent) with abdominal pain level at a 10 (worst pain). E #2 stated based on the patient's clinical presentation, Pt #1 should have remained at level 3 after triage. E #2 further stated the triage nurse should have notified the physician of the patient's pain score of 10; and also have notified the assigned nurse, to perform reassessment of Pt #1's pain level, while waiting for medical evaluation. 5.. On 3/2/16 at approximately 1:00 PM the Medical Director of the Emergency Department (MD #1) was interviewed. MD #1 stated it is the expectation that every patient who that presents to the ED receives a Medical Screen Examination (MSE). MD #1 stated it is the physician's responsibility to identify and assess patients for any life threatening situation. 6.. On 3/2/16 at approximately 1:15 PM the Director of Emergency Services (E #3) was interviewed. E # 3 stated the triage nurse should have alerted the physician of Pt #1's pain level. E #3 stated the physician should have been alerted for patients who presented with pain level at 10 for them (physician) to evaluate the case.

See Less ↑
APPROPRIATE TRANSFER

Mar 3, 2016

Based on document review and interview, it was determined that for 1 of 2 (Pt.

See More ↓

Based on document review and interview, it was determined that for 1 of 2 (Pt. #8), clinical records reviewed for transfers to another hospital, the Hospital failed to ensure an appropriate transfer. Findings include: 1. On 3/1/16 at approximately 2:00 PM, the clinical record of Pt. #8 was reviewed. Pt. #8 was a [AGE] year old male who presented to the emergency department (ED) on 10/14/15 with a chief complaint of altered mental status change. The clinical record indicated Pt. #8 was transferred to another hospital on [DATE] at 6:20 PM. A nurse's note on 10/14/15 at 6:20 PM indicated, "(Ambulance) has arrived for pt (Pt #8), pt stable at this time for transfer." 2. On 3/2/16 at approximately 10:00 AM, the Director of Regulatory Compliance stated that Pt. #8's transfer form for 10/14/15 could not be located in Pt #8 chart. The Director presented a preprinted form entitled "Interfacility Patient Transfer Form" and stated this form is required to be completed when a patient is transferred. This form includes the following information: determination of stability, physician certification, patient consent, and the receiving physician of the other hospital. 3. On 3/2/16 at approximately 1:00 PM, the Director of Regulatory Compliance reviewed Pt #8's clinical record, and stated the required information was not in the record: acceptance of the receiving physician at the other Hospital, patient's consent to transfer or the physician certification that patient was stable to transfer. 4. On 3/2/16 at approximately 1:30 PM, an interview was conducted with the ED Medical Director (MD #1). MD #1 stated the expectation is prior to each patient that is transferred the transfer forms are completed and included in the patient's clinical record.

See Less ↑
Notes

“Average time” refers to the median wait time (the midpoint of all patients' wait times). References to “doctor or medical practitioner” indicate a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. CMS reports the CT scan quality measure as the percentage of patients who received a scan within 45 minutes. We have reversed that measure so that all measures follow a “lower is better” pattern.

Additional design and development by Mike Tigas and Sisi Wei.

Sources

All data comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Detailed quality measures at the hospital, state and national level were last updated September 2019. Most data was collected between October 2017 and October 2018. Data on ER-related violations is from January 2015 to June 2019.

Additional Info

How We've Updated ER Inspector | Download ProPublica's Emergency Room Planning Toolkit | About This Data

Don’t See Your ER?

In some cases we aren’t able to identify the exact location of a hospital, so it doesn’t appear on our mapped search results. However, it may still be in our database – try looking for it in the list of hospitals on each state's page.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from our database because it doesn't have an emergency department.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from the federal government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data. There are a couple of reasons why a hospital isn’t included in CMS data: it may not participate in Medicare, or it may share a certification number with another hospital (common across large hospital systems).

If you notice a hospital missing from our database, please first check if you can find it on CMS' website, and that it is listed as having an ER. If so, please email us with the hospital name and address.