ER Inspector NORTHERN LIGHT INLAND HOSPITALNORTHERN LIGHT INLAND HOSPITAL

ER Inspector

Find and Evaluate Every Emergency Room Near You

Updated September 19, 2019

This database was last updated in September 2019. It should only be used as a historical snapshot.Researchers can find more recent data on timely and effective care in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospitals datasets and guidance about hospital regulations.

If you are having a heart attack or life-threatening emergency, call 911.

ER Inspector » Maine » NORTHERN LIGHT INLAND HOSPITAL

Don’t see your ER? Find out why it might be missing.

NORTHERN LIGHT INLAND HOSPITAL

200 kennedy memorial drive, waterville, Maine 04901

(207) 861-3000

79% of Patients Would "Definitely Recommend" this Hospital
(Maine Avg: 75%)

2 violations related to ER care since 2015

Hospital Type

Acute Care Hospitals

Hospital Owner

Proprietary

ER Volume

Low (0 - 20K patients a year)

See this hospital's CMS profile page or inspection reports.

Patient Pathways Through This ER

After a patient arrives at the emergency room, they are typically seen by a doctor or medical practitioner and then either sent home or admitted to the hospital and taken to a room. A small percentage of patients leave without being seen. The chart below shows on average how long each of these pathways take. Lower numbers are better, and all times refer to the average length of time people waited.

Arrives at ER
1% of patients leave without being seen
4hrs 38min Admitted to hospital
6hrs 17min Taken to room
2hrs 18min Sent home

All wait times are average.

Detailed Quality Measures

Here is a more in depth look at each quality measure, compared to state and national averages for hospitals with low ER volumes. Experts caution that very small differences between hospitals for a given measure are unlikely to correspond to noticeable differences in the real world.

Measure
Average for this Hospital
How this Hospital Compares

(to other hospitals with similar
ER volumes, when available)

Discharged Patients
Time Until Sent Home

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being sent home (if not admitted).

2hrs 18min
National Avg.
1hr 53min
Maine Avg.
2hrs
This Hospital
2hrs 18min
Impatient Patients
Left Without
Being Seen

Percentage of patients who left the emergency room without being seen by a doctor or medical practitioner.

1%
Avg. U.S. Hospital
2%
Avg. Maine Hospital
2%
This Hospital
1%
Admitted Patients
Time Before Admission

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being admitted to the hospital.

4hrs 38min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
3hrs 30min
Maine Avg.
4hrs 56min
This Hospital
4hrs 38min
Admitted Patients
Transfer Time

Among patients admitted, additional time they spent waiting before being taken to their room (sometimes referred to as "boarding time.")

1hr 39min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
57min
Maine Avg.
1hr 24min
This Hospital
1hr 39min
Special Patients
CT Scan

Percentage of patients who arrived with stroke symptoms and did not receive brain scan results within 45 mins.

No Data Available

The number of cases/patients is too few to report.

National Avg.
27%
Maine Avg.
38%
This Hospital
No Data Available

Violations Related to ER Care

Problems found in emergency rooms at this hospital since 2015, as identified during the investigation of a complaint. About This Data →

Violation
Full Text
RECEIVING AN INAPPROPRIATE TRANSFER

Feb 27, 2017

Based on document review and interviews, it was determined that the hospital failed to report to CMS or the State Survey Agency a suspected incidence of an individual transferred in violation of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) for one (1) of twenty (20) emergency department (ED) records reviewed (Record A).

See More ↓

Based on document review and interviews, it was determined that the hospital failed to report to CMS or the State Survey Agency a suspected incidence of an individual transferred in violation of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) for one (1) of twenty (20) emergency department (ED) records reviewed (Record A). The finding includes: On February 15, 2017 at 2:46 PM, the state agency had been notified by a Physician at Hospital A of a possible EMTALA violation related to Hospital A. On February 11, 2017 at approximately 5:00 AM, Sebasticook Valley EMS called Hospital A indicating that they were transporting two (2) patients who had called for an ambulance and were expressing suicidal ideations. Hospital A's ED Nurse told them that they could take one patient but not both. One of the two (2) patients was transported to Inland Hospital. As of February 27, 2017, the state agency had not received notification from Inland Hospital (the receiving hospital) that there may possibly be an EMTALA violation. On February 23, 2017 at approximately 3:24 PM, Paramedic #1, who was assigned to the ambulance that transported both patients on February 11, 2017, was interviewed via telephone. Paramedic #1 stated that she was the driver of the ambulance and was present when the second patient was delivered to Inland Hospital. Paramedic 1 stated "my partner told Inland that the other hospital had refused to take this patient". On February 24, 2017 at approximately 11:50 AM, Paramedic #2 was interviewed via telephone. He stated that he "informed Inland that originally we were going to [Hospital A] with both patients and they refused to take both so we took him/her here." Paramedic #2 also stated "this information was reiterated to the nurse at Inland". Paramedic #2 stated that there was no response to this information other than "an offhand statement that it was odd this happened". The Vice President of Quality at Inland Hospital stated, on February 27, 2017 at approximately 10:30 AM, that the hospital was "in the process of working with legal to determine if we need to report the suspected EMTALA violation that recently occurred" [February 11, 2017]. Hospital Policy "EMHS - System Policy #: 21-007" titled "Emergency Treatment and Transfer Rules" states under part V the following: - "A. If hospital personnel knowingly, willingly, or negligently failed to meet the requirements of this law, the hospital is subject to termination of the Medicare provider agreement". - "I. If the hospital received a patient in transfer in an unstable emergency medical condition in violation of part II of this policy, the department head of the receiving unit must contact the Chief, Emergency Medicine Service who will determine whether a report must be filed with HCFA, after consultation with the EMHS vice president and general counsel." On February 27, 2017 at approximately 10:40 AM, the hospital provided copies of the transporting ambulance service documentation regarding this incident which included the ambulance "run forms" for the patient identified as Record A and the second patient that was transported to Hospital A and written statements by both paramedics. The written statement by Paramedic #1 reported "Inland was notified that [other hospital] refused the second patient". Additionally "(afterward [Paramedic #2] had mentioned that the Charge RN [nurse's name] had said that it wasn't fair for them to have two drunk friends in the same unit)". The written statement by Paramedic #2 stated "On calling [Hospital A] ER (emergency room ) they stated that they would only take one and the other would have to go to Inland. I stated that I was bringing them both pt [patients] and they stated that one would have to go to Inland as they did not feel it was appropriate for both to be in the same ER". Record A was reviewed on February 27, 2017 at approximately 1:00 PM. The record indicated that the patient arrived at the Inland Hospital Emergency Department on February 11, 2017 at 5:30 AM, with a chief complaint of "I am paranoid. My mind is racing. I am hearing voices." Report stated "Hx [history] of multiple suicide attempts. States does not feel safe at home, but does not have suicidal thoughts at this time". On February 27, 2017 at approximately 3:45 PM, the Vice President of Quality confirmed that the hospital had not reported the suspected violation of the EMTALA regulations to either CMS or the State Agency. He/she reiterated "The hospital, through legal, believed that the hospital needed to complete an internal investigation to determine if a violation needed to be reported".

See Less ↑
POSTING OF SIGNS

Feb 27, 2017

Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conspicuously post a sign specifying the rights of individuals regarding Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) statute in places likely to be noticed by all individuals seeking treatment in the Emergency Department (ED).

See More ↓

Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conspicuously post a sign specifying the rights of individuals regarding Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) statute in places likely to be noticed by all individuals seeking treatment in the Emergency Department (ED). The finding includes During a tour of the ED on February 27, 2017 at approximately 10:45 AM, it was observed that the notification of EMTALA rights was located in the walk in entrance area in the waiting room. However, it was observed that the ambulance entrance failed to have any sign posted providing EMTALA notification for patients arriving by ambulance. This finding was confirmed by both the Emergency Department Director and the Birthing Center Director (Former ED Director) on February 27, 2017 approximately 10:55 AM. The Birthing Center Director stated "I never thought about the need to place a sign in the ambulance entrance, but that makes sense".

See Less ↑
Notes

“Average time” refers to the median wait time (the midpoint of all patients' wait times). References to “doctor or medical practitioner” indicate a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. CMS reports the CT scan quality measure as the percentage of patients who received a scan within 45 minutes. We have reversed that measure so that all measures follow a “lower is better” pattern.

Additional design and development by Mike Tigas and Sisi Wei.

Sources

All data comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Detailed quality measures at the hospital, state and national level were last updated September 2019. Most data was collected between October 2017 and October 2018. Data on ER-related violations is from January 2015 to June 2019.

Additional Info

How We've Updated ER Inspector | Download ProPublica's Emergency Room Planning Toolkit | About This Data

Don’t See Your ER?

In some cases we aren’t able to identify the exact location of a hospital, so it doesn’t appear on our mapped search results. However, it may still be in our database – try looking for it in the list of hospitals on each state's page.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from our database because it doesn't have an emergency department.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from the federal government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data. There are a couple of reasons why a hospital isn’t included in CMS data: it may not participate in Medicare, or it may share a certification number with another hospital (common across large hospital systems).

If you notice a hospital missing from our database, please first check if you can find it on CMS' website, and that it is listed as having an ER. If so, please email us with the hospital name and address.