ER Inspector AURORA SHEBOYGAN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CTRAURORA SHEBOYGAN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CTR

ER Inspector

Find and Evaluate Every Emergency Room Near You

Updated September 19, 2019

This database was last updated in September 2019. It should only be used as a historical snapshot.Researchers can find more recent data on timely and effective care in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospitals datasets and guidance about hospital regulations.

If you are having a heart attack or life-threatening emergency, call 911.

ER Inspector » Wisconsin » AURORA SHEBOYGAN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CTR

Don’t see your ER? Find out why it might be missing.

AURORA SHEBOYGAN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CTR

2629 n 7th st, sheboygan, Wis. 53083

(920) 451-5000

74% of Patients Would "Definitely Recommend" this Hospital
(Wis. Avg: 76%)

4 violations related to ER care since 2015

Hospital Type

Acute Care Hospitals

Hospital Owner

Voluntary non-profit - Private

ER Volume

Medium (20K - 40K patients a year)

See this hospital's CMS profile page or inspection reports.

Patient Pathways Through This ER

After a patient arrives at the emergency room, they are typically seen by a doctor or medical practitioner and then either sent home or admitted to the hospital and taken to a room. A small percentage of patients leave without being seen. The chart below shows on average how long each of these pathways take. Lower numbers are better, and all times refer to the average length of time people waited.

Arrives at ER
1% of patients leave without being seen
3hrs 16min Admitted to hospital
4hrs 8min Taken to room
2hrs 17min Sent home

All wait times are average.

Detailed Quality Measures

Here is a more in depth look at each quality measure, compared to state and national averages for hospitals with medium ER volumes. Experts caution that very small differences between hospitals for a given measure are unlikely to correspond to noticeable differences in the real world.

Measure
Average for this Hospital
How this Hospital Compares

(to other hospitals with similar
ER volumes, when available)

Discharged Patients
Time Until Sent Home

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being sent home (if not admitted).

2hrs 17min
National Avg.
2hrs 23min
Wis. Avg.
2hrs 13min
This Hospital
2hrs 17min
Impatient Patients
Left Without
Being Seen

Percentage of patients who left the emergency room without being seen by a doctor or medical practitioner.

1%
Avg. U.S. Hospital
2%
Avg. Wis. Hospital
1%
This Hospital
1%
Admitted Patients
Time Before Admission

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being admitted to the hospital.

3hrs 16min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
4hrs 21min
Wis. Avg.
3hrs 29min
This Hospital
3hrs 16min
Admitted Patients
Transfer Time

Among patients admitted, additional time they spent waiting before being taken to their room (sometimes referred to as "boarding time.")

52min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
1hr 33min
Wis. Avg.
1hr 8min
This Hospital
52min
Special Patients
CT Scan

Percentage of patients who arrived with stroke symptoms and did not receive brain scan results within 45 mins.

13%
National Avg.
27%
Wis. Avg.
25%
This Hospital
13%

Violations Related to ER Care

Problems found in emergency rooms at this hospital since 2015, as identified during the investigation of a complaint. About This Data →

Violation
Full Text
MEDICAL SCREENING EXAM

Jul 17, 2017

Based on record review and interview the Emergency Department staff failed to complete a comprehensive medical screening examination for 1 patient (Patient #17) in a sample of 20 medical records reviewed. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, "Emtala: Screening, Stabilization and Transfer", #179, dated 12/15 was received for review on 7/17/2017 at 3:13 PM.

See More ↓

Based on record review and interview the Emergency Department staff failed to complete a comprehensive medical screening examination for 1 patient (Patient #17) in a sample of 20 medical records reviewed. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, "Emtala: Screening, Stabilization and Transfer", #179, dated 12/15 was received for review on 7/17/2017 at 3:13 PM. The policy states in part under 5. Procedures 5.1 Medical Screening Examinations (MSE) a) General i) A MSE is an examination performed by a physician or a QMP (Qualified Medical Provider) to determine with reasonable clinical confidence whether an EMC (Emergency Medical Condition) exists. If an EMC does exist, Medical Center staff must provide Stabilizing treatment for the patient's EMC within the Capabilities and Capacity of the Medical Center. 5.3 Medical Screening Examination Requirements, A physician or QMP must perform and document a MSE for each individual who presents in the following circmstances: a) Presentation to a Dedicated Emergency Department. A medical record review was conducted on Patient #17's emergency department record on 7/17/2017 at 1:50 PM accompanied by Lead Emergency Department Nurse and Educator E who confirmed the following findings: Patient #17 is a [AGE] year old who (MDS) dated [DATE] at 8:07 PM with the chief complaint of depression and homicidal ideation (with no specific target). Patient #17 requested an admission to the behavioral health unit however there were no available beds and the provider discussed with Patient #17 that a transfer to an alternate facility could be arranged. Patient #17 refused the transfer stating #17 only wanted to be admitted to this facility and according to the provider's note, "At this point Patient got up and walked out of the ER [emergency room ]." Per interview with Nurse E on 7/17/2017 at 1:56 PM regarding documentation in the medical record that states, physician did not perform a physical exam on the patient, Nurse E stated the patient left before an exam could be completed.

See Less ↑
COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24

Jul 17, 2017

Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure compliance with EMTALA (Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act) regulations in 3 of 11 required areas (Medical Screening Examination, Stabilizing Treatment, and Appropriate Transfer).

See More ↓

Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure compliance with EMTALA (Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act) regulations in 3 of 11 required areas (Medical Screening Examination, Stabilizing Treatment, and Appropriate Transfer). Failure to comply with these requirements has the potential to affect all patients presenting to the Emergency Department. Findings include: The facility failed to complete a comprehensive medical screening examination for 1of 20 patients presenting to the Emergency Department. See tag C2406. The facility failed to complete the appropriate documentation for 1 of 2 patients who left the Emergency Department against medical advice. See Tag C2407. The facility failed to complete the patient transfer form information for 1 of 3 patients transferred. See Tag C2409.

See Less ↑
STABILIZING TREATMENT

Jul 17, 2017

Based on record review and interview, staff at this facility failed to complete the appropriate documentation for 1 of 2 patients who left against medical advice (Patient #14) in a sample of 20.

See More ↓

Based on record review and interview, staff at this facility failed to complete the appropriate documentation for 1 of 2 patients who left against medical advice (Patient #14) in a sample of 20. Findings include: A medical record review was conducted on Patient #14's emergency room record on 7/17/17 at 12:55 PM accompanied by Lead Emergency Department Nurse and Educator E who confirmed the following finding: Patient #14 (MDS) dated [DATE] at 6:08 PM with complaints of lower abdominal pain. According to the documentation, Patient #14 has an extreme fear of needles and refused any intravenous lines, laboratory tests or scans to determine the cause of the abdominal pain. Patient #14 left the emergency department against medical advice at 7:40 PM. According to the provider note, the provider documentation states, "The patient understands that they are taking their health and life into their own hands and putting themselves at risk for death, disability and worsening condition. The patient verbalized understanding of this and signed AMA [against medical advice]." The Informed Refusal form is incomplete. It does not indicate the recommendations from the provider or the risks, benefits, and alternatives related to the refusal. Per interview with Nurse E on 7/17/17 at 2:09 PM regarding the missing documentation, Nurse E stated, "If this is an AMA [against medical advice] form they [the provider] will sometimes put that in their note." When asked if the patient signs or receives a copy of the provider note Nurse E said they do not and therefore would not have a written record of the risks and benefits of refusing treatment. The facility's policy titled, "Informed Consent-Informed Refusal," #246, dated 5/30/17, was received for review on 7/17/17 at 3:13 PM. The policy states in part on page 12 of 24, "Document that the patient has been provided (or staff has attempted to prove) the information described in Section C.2. above, including information regarding the risks of forgoing treatment and request that the patient's review and sign an AHC-System [acronym for the facility corporation] approved informed refusal form. If the patient refuses to sign the informed refusal form, document the circumstances, the request, and the reasons for the patient's refusal on the informed refusal form and place it in the patients' medical record."

See Less ↑
APPROPRIATE TRANSFER

Jul 17, 2017

Based on record review and interview, staff failed to accurately complete the patient transfer form information in 1 of 3 patients transferred (Patient #12) in a sample of 20. Findings include: Patient #12's medical record was reviewed on 7/17/17 at 11:37 AM accompanied by Lead Emergency Department Nurse and Educator E who confirmed the following finding: Patient #12 was transferred to a higher level of acute care on 6/26/17 after presenting to the Emergency Department with stroke like symptoms.

See More ↓

Based on record review and interview, staff failed to accurately complete the patient transfer form information in 1 of 3 patients transferred (Patient #12) in a sample of 20. Findings include: Patient #12's medical record was reviewed on 7/17/17 at 11:37 AM accompanied by Lead Emergency Department Nurse and Educator E who confirmed the following finding: Patient #12 was transferred to a higher level of acute care on 6/26/17 after presenting to the Emergency Department with stroke like symptoms. On the Patient Transfer form, the Emergency Department provider indicates the reason for transfer is "Specialty services/expertise not available at this facility." The section on the form for services/expertise not available is blank and states, "no data." This is in section 1 of the form. Per interview with Nurse E on 7/17/17 at 11:44 AM regarding the services/expertise that were needed, Nurse E stated that the services not available could be in the provider note, but confirmed that they are not on the form. The protocol for providers to fill out the electronic patient transfer form was received for review on 7/17/17 at 3:19 PM. The protocol indicates that the provider is to fill out section 1 and 2 in full. The protocol goes on to say that after sections 1 and 2 are completed, the form is to be printed to obtain signatures from the patient/representative/law enforcement, physician, and nurse.

See Less ↑
Notes

“Average time” refers to the median wait time (the midpoint of all patients' wait times). References to “doctor or medical practitioner” indicate a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. CMS reports the CT scan quality measure as the percentage of patients who received a scan within 45 minutes. We have reversed that measure so that all measures follow a “lower is better” pattern.

Additional design and development by Mike Tigas and Sisi Wei.

Sources

All data comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Detailed quality measures at the hospital, state and national level were last updated September 2019. Most data was collected between October 2017 and October 2018. Data on ER-related violations is from January 2015 to June 2019.

Additional Info

How We've Updated ER Inspector | Download ProPublica's Emergency Room Planning Toolkit | About This Data

Don’t See Your ER?

In some cases we aren’t able to identify the exact location of a hospital, so it doesn’t appear on our mapped search results. However, it may still be in our database – try looking for it in the list of hospitals on each state's page.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from our database because it doesn't have an emergency department.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from the federal government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data. There are a couple of reasons why a hospital isn’t included in CMS data: it may not participate in Medicare, or it may share a certification number with another hospital (common across large hospital systems).

If you notice a hospital missing from our database, please first check if you can find it on CMS' website, and that it is listed as having an ER. If so, please email us with the hospital name and address.