ER Inspector WHEATON FRANCISCAN HEALTHCARE ST FRANCIS HOSPITALWHEATON FRANCISCAN HEALTHCARE ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL

ER Inspector

Find and Evaluate Every Emergency Room Near You

Updated September 19, 2019

This database was last updated in September 2019. It should only be used as a historical snapshot.Researchers can find more recent data on timely and effective care in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospitals datasets and guidance about hospital regulations.

If you are having a heart attack or life-threatening emergency, call 911.

ER Inspector » Wisconsin » WHEATON FRANCISCAN HEALTHCARE ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL

Don’t see your ER? Find out why it might be missing.

WHEATON FRANCISCAN HEALTHCARE ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL

3237 s 16th st, milwaukee, Wis. 53215

(414) 647-5000

66% of Patients Would "Definitely Recommend" this Hospital
(Wis. Avg: 76%)

3 violations related to ER care since 2015

Hospital Type

Acute Care Hospitals

Hospital Owner

Voluntary non-profit - Private

ER Volume

High (40K - 60K patients a year)

See this hospital's CMS profile page or inspection reports.

Patient Pathways Through This ER

After a patient arrives at the emergency room, they are typically seen by a doctor or medical practitioner and then either sent home or admitted to the hospital and taken to a room. A small percentage of patients leave without being seen. The chart below shows on average how long each of these pathways take. Lower numbers are better, and all times refer to the average length of time people waited.

Arrives at ER
1% of patients leave without being seen
4hrs 21min Admitted to hospital
6hrs 1min Taken to room
1hr 50min Sent home

All wait times are average.

Detailed Quality Measures

Here is a more in depth look at each quality measure, compared to state and national averages for hospitals with high ER volumes. Experts caution that very small differences between hospitals for a given measure are unlikely to correspond to noticeable differences in the real world.

Measure
Average for this Hospital
How this Hospital Compares

(to other hospitals with similar
ER volumes, when available)

Discharged Patients
Time Until Sent Home

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being sent home (if not admitted).

1hr 50min
National Avg.
2hrs 42min
Wis. Avg.
2hrs 8min
This Hospital
1hr 50min
Impatient Patients
Left Without
Being Seen

Percentage of patients who left the emergency room without being seen by a doctor or medical practitioner.

1%
Avg. U.S. Hospital
2%
Avg. Wis. Hospital
1%
This Hospital
1%
Admitted Patients
Time Before Admission

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being admitted to the hospital.

4hrs 21min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
5hrs 4min
Wis. Avg.
3hrs 52min
This Hospital
4hrs 21min
Admitted Patients
Transfer Time

Among patients admitted, additional time they spent waiting before being taken to their room (sometimes referred to as "boarding time.")

1hr 40min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
2hrs 2min
Wis. Avg.
1hr 11min
This Hospital
1hr 40min
Special Patients
CT Scan

Percentage of patients who arrived with stroke symptoms and did not receive brain scan results within 45 mins.

No Data Available

The number of cases/patients is too few to report.

National Avg.
27%
Wis. Avg.
25%
This Hospital
No Data Available

Violations Related to ER Care

Problems found in emergency rooms at this hospital since 2015, as identified during the investigation of a complaint. About This Data →

Violation
Full Text
COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24

Sep 12, 2017

Based on record review and interview this hospital failed to ensure they were in compliance with all EMTALA requirements under 42 CFR 489.20 and 42 CFR 489.24.

See More ↓

Based on record review and interview this hospital failed to ensure they were in compliance with all EMTALA requirements under 42 CFR 489.20 and 42 CFR 489.24. This occurred in 1 of 20 sampled patients (Patient #1), who presented to the Emergency Department seeking emergency medical care. Failure to maintain compliance with EMTALA requirements has the potential to affect all patients seeking care in this facilities Emergency Department. Findings include: Patient #1 came to the hospital at 8:08 AM on 8/25/17 via ambulance. The hospital failed to include Patient #1 on their Emergency Department Central Log. (Reference 2405) Patient #1 was in the hospital ambulance bay for approximately 12 minutes and did not receive a Medical Screening Exam before Patient #1 was transported to another hospital. (Reference 2406)

See Less ↑
EMERGENCY ROOM LOG

Sep 12, 2017

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a log of all patients presenting to the Emergency Department in 1 of 20 patients reviewed (Patient #1).

See More ↓

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a log of all patients presenting to the Emergency Department in 1 of 20 patients reviewed (Patient #1). This has the potential to affect all patients presenting to the facility seeking Emergency Services. Findings include: The policy titled "EMTALA: Medical Screening and Stabilizing Treatment" dated December 1, 2015 was reviewed on 9/6/2017 at 11:26 AM. This document states in part "Log. The hospital will maintain a centralized log on each person who comes to any and all areas of the Hospital seeking emergency medical screening and treatment. The log must include: whether the individual refused treatment or was refused treatment including explanatory details..." Reviewed Patient #1's Medical Record dated 8/25/2017 at 11:30 AM. Patient #1 was admitted to St. Francis Emergency Department (ED) with altered mental status at 1:19 AM and was discharged with a diagnosis of intoxication and alcohol abuse at 7:19 AM. Patient #1 returned to St. Francis at 8:08 AM via ambulance. There is no record of Patient #1 returning to St. Francis on 8/25/17 at 8:08 AM on the Emergency Department Centralized log. An interview was conducted with Director of Emergency Department (ED) B on 9/6/17 at 10:31 AM. Director of ED B stated the hospital reviewed security footage and noted the ambulance arrived into the ambulance bay on 8/25/17 at 8:08 AM and nurses went to see the patient in the ambulance bay at 8:10 AM, a police officer spoke with the patient at 8:16 AM and at 8:20 AM the ambulance was seen leaving. A second interview was conducted with Director of ED B on 9/6/17 at 1:11 PM. Director of ED B was asked if Patient #1 was on the ED log for the 8:08 AM encounter. ED B stated Patient #1 was not on the log for the 8:08 AM encounter.

See Less ↑
MEDICAL SCREENING EXAM

Sep 12, 2017

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a Medical Screening Exam (MSE) for 1 of 20 Emergency Department Patients reviewed (Patient #1).

See More ↓

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a Medical Screening Exam (MSE) for 1 of 20 Emergency Department Patients reviewed (Patient #1). This has the potential to affect all patients presenting to the facility seeking Emergency Services. Findings include: The policy titled "EMTALA: Medical Screening and Stabilizing Treatment" dated December 1, 2015 was reviewed on 9/6/2017 at 11:26 AM. This document states in part "1. Medical Screening Examination - Any patient who comes to the Hospital's dedicated emergency department and requests or has a request made on his or her behalf for emergency examination and treatment or who a prudent layperson would believe, on the basis of the individual's appearance or behavior, requires examination or treatment for a medical condition, will be provided an appropriate medical screening examination within the capabilities of the dedicated emergency department including ancillary services routinely available to the emergency department to determine whether an emergency medical condition exists regardless of their ability to pay for medical care." Reviewed Patient #1's Emergency Department Medical Record dated 8/25/2017. Patient #1 was admitted to St. Francis ER with altered mental status at 1:19 AM and was discharged with a diagnosis of intoxication and alcohol abuse at 7:19 AM. Patient #1 was escorted off hospital property for wandering the halls and reportedly drinking hand sanitizer from the dispenser. Per ambulance report Patient #1 returned to the facility via ambulance at 8:08 AM with complaints of inability to walk. This return visit was not documented by the facility. An interview was conducted with Director of Emergency Department (ED) B on 9/6/17 at 10:31 AM. Director of ED B stated the hospital reviewed security footage and noted the ambulance arrived into the ambulance bay at 8:08 AM and nurses went to see the patient in the ambulance bay at 8:10 AM, a police officer spoke with the patient at 8:16 AM and at 8:20 AM the ambulance was seen leaving. An interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) C on 9/6/2016 at 12:10 PM via phone. RN C stated RN D and RN C went out to get the patient. RN C stated "The EMT refused to open the door because the patient was aggressive. I asked the police officer that was here to go talk to the EMT and the patient." RN C stated RN C did not know what happened to the patient after that. An interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) D on 9/7/2017 at 10:00 AM via phone. RN D stated RN D was sitting at the nurses station when the Bell ambulance EMT came to the desk to give report for Patient #1. RN D stated Patient #1 was still in the ambulance. RN D stated "me and (RN C went out to evaluate (Patient #1) in the ambulance bay. The EMT refused to open the door because the patient was hostile." RN D stated "the police were asked to go out and talk to the patient and that was the last thing I heard." RN D stated RN D had no further contact with Patient #1 after that. An interview was conducted with Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) G on 9/12/17 at 2:30 PM via phone. EMT G stated Patient #1 was picked up. Patient #1 was asked which hospital Patient #1 wanted to go to and Patient #1 stated the closest. EMT G informed Patient #1 that St. Francis was the closest and the patient agreed to go there. EMT G called the nurse at St. Francis to give report but stated by the time they answered the ambulance was on site so EMT G informed the nurse EMT G would come in and give report. EMT G stated G went to the nursing station to give report and when G "gave the patient name they said they would not see the patient as (Patient #1) was just discharged and escorted from the property." Staff refused to see the patient and a police officer was sent out. The police officer came out and talked to the patient. The police officer asked Patient #1 why Patient #1 wanted to be seen and Patient #1 stated "So I don't die." Patient #1 stated Patient #1 wanted to go to Sinai. ED staff was aware that Patient #1 was on hospital property when Patient #1 requested to go to Sinai. Reviewed Patient #1's Medical Record from Aurora Sinai dated 8/25/2017 at 8:43 AM. Patient #1 was treated in the ED at Sinai for intoxication with a blood alcohol level greater than when the patient was discharged from St. Francis on 8/25/17 at 7:19 AM. An interview was conducted with Director of ED B on 9/6/2017 at 1:11 PM. Director B stated there is not a record of Patient #1 being at St. Francis at 8:08 AM. Patient #1 was not on the ED log and does not have a documented MSE on 8/25/17 at 8:08 AM.

See Less ↑
Notes

“Average time” refers to the median wait time (the midpoint of all patients' wait times). References to “doctor or medical practitioner” indicate a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. CMS reports the CT scan quality measure as the percentage of patients who received a scan within 45 minutes. We have reversed that measure so that all measures follow a “lower is better” pattern.

Additional design and development by Mike Tigas and Sisi Wei.

Sources

All data comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Detailed quality measures at the hospital, state and national level were last updated September 2019. Most data was collected between October 2017 and October 2018. Data on ER-related violations is from January 2015 to June 2019.

Additional Info

How We've Updated ER Inspector | Download ProPublica's Emergency Room Planning Toolkit | About This Data

Don’t See Your ER?

In some cases we aren’t able to identify the exact location of a hospital, so it doesn’t appear on our mapped search results. However, it may still be in our database – try looking for it in the list of hospitals on each state's page.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from our database because it doesn't have an emergency department.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from the federal government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data. There are a couple of reasons why a hospital isn’t included in CMS data: it may not participate in Medicare, or it may share a certification number with another hospital (common across large hospital systems).

If you notice a hospital missing from our database, please first check if you can find it on CMS' website, and that it is listed as having an ER. If so, please email us with the hospital name and address.