Search Privacy Violations, Breaches and Complaints
This database was last updated in December 2015 ago and should only be used as a historical snapshot. More recent data on breaches affecting 500 or more people is available at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Breach Portal.
SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL
Cited by the California Department of Public Health for violations of California’s Health and Safety Code relating to medical privacy during an inspection that began on January 10, 2013. Also cited in 27 other reports.
Report ID: JJKG11.01, California Department of Public Health
Reported Entity: SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL
Issue:
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the unauthorized access to and disclosure of Patient 1's confidential medical information by Staff 1.Findings:During an interview on 1/17/13 at 4:15 PM, the facility's Privacy Officer (PO) related the details of her investigation into a possible medical information breach. The PO stated she was initially alerted to the potential breach by the Risk Management Department on 11/5/12. The source of this information was a Nurse Midwife in the Obstetrics Clinic (Staff 1). The PO stated that on 11/6/12 she interviewed Staff 1 who related that a patient in the clinic, Patient 1, believed that an employee (Staff 1) in another department had accessed her medical information and had passed this information on the Patient 1's ex-boyfriend. The PO stated that on 11/6/12, she had an audit run of the computer access into Patient 1's Lifetime Care Record (LCR) which indicated access by Staff 1 on 5/16/12 and 9/5/12. Staff 1 did worked in the Family Health Clinic so the PO thought it was unusual for her to access patient records in the Obstetric Clinic. The PO met with Staff 1 on or about 11/9/12 for a preliminary interview. During this meeting Staff 1 denied knowing Patient 1 and denied accessing her medical records.The PO said Patient 1 was not available for interview, through a translator, until 11/9/12 and again on 11/13/12. During these interviews Patient 1 told the PO that her ex-boyfriend knew medical information about her which had to come from her record at the facility. Patient 1 stated that Staff 1 was dating her ex-boyfriend and both of them had come to Patient 1's home prior to this incident. Since Patient 1 had a restraining order against her ex-boyfriend, she had called the police. Patient 1 was able to show the PO the police report which identified Staff 1 as being with the ex-boyfriend when he illegally entered Patient 1's home.The PO stated that she, other facility administrators, Staff 1, and Staff 1's Union Representative had a formal meeting on 11/14/12 during which Staff 1 admitted accessing Patient 1's medical record without authorization, and Staff 1 admitted disclosing Patient 1's medical information to the boyfriend.The facility put Staff 1 on administrative leave and deleted her access to the computer system on 11/14/12. The disciplinary process for Staff 1 is underway.Review of Staff 1's Personnel Files indicated Staff 1 indicated two "User Confidentiality and Security Agreement Form" signed by Staff 1 on 2/1/07 and 4/15/10. This form includes the statement: "I will only access, discuss, or divulge confidential DPH (Department of Public Health) information required for the performance of my job duties."Record review also indicated Staff 1 took and completed the facility's annual training courses on Information Security, Privacy, and HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) on 4/19/12.The facility policy and procedure "Confidentiality, Security, and Release of Protected Health Information" dated 6/11, which stated "Uses of protected health information in any context or for any purpose other than direct patient care must be approved through the applicable processes outlined below..."Staff 1 worked in a different clinic from where Patient 1 was being seen. Staff 1 had no need to access Patient 1's medical record. Therefore, Staff 1's entry into Patient 1's medical record on 5/16/12 and 9/5/12 was an unauthorized breach.Disclosure of Patient 1's medical information to an unauthorized recipient was also an unauthorized breach of Patient 1's protected health information and a violation of California State Privacy laws.
Outcome:
Deficiency cited by the California Department of Public Health: Health & Safety Code 1280