This database was last updated in December 2015 ago and should only be used as a historical snapshot. More recent data on breaches affecting 500 or more people is available at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Breach Portal.

SUTTER SANTA ROSA REGIONAL HOSPITAL

30 MARK WEST SPRINGS ROAD SANTA ROSA,CA 95403

Cited by the California Department of Public Health for a violation of California’s Health and Safety Code relating to medical privacy during an inspection that began on August 28, 2013. Also cited in 15 other reports.


Report ID: U22C11, California Department of Public Health

Reported Entity: SUTTER SANTA ROSA REGIONAL HOSPITAL

Issue:

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent unauthorized access and disclosure of eight patients' (Patient 1-8) medical information when Patient 1-8's assistance applications were faxed to the wrong office. These failures allowed the unlawful or unauthorized access to protected health information.Findings:The California Department of Public Health was notified on 8/16/13 that a, "Breach of Protected Health Information (PHI)", occurred on 8/12/13.During an interview on 9/3/13 at 4 p.m., Administrative Staff A stated that, on 8/16/13, she was advised, by Supervisor B that Unlicensed Staff C had accidentally sent a fax to a county Health Clinic, on 8/12/13, with Patient 1-8's PHI, which contained their name, address, phone number, social security number, date of birth, ethnicity and primary language spoken. Administrative Staff A also stated that Unlicensed Staff D called Supervisor B at the facility, on 8/13/13, to notify her that the county Health Clinic had received eight patients' confidential information in error.Administrative Staff A further stated that it was an error made by Unlicensed Staff C, who pressed the preset number for the Health Clinic instead of the preset number for the Agency that was supposed to receive the information.A review of the facility Policy and Procedure for, "FACSIMILE (FAX) TRANSMISSION OF MEDICAL RECORDS", (7/12), reveals the following: "I. POLICY The sensitive information contained in health records may be transmitted via facsimile (fax) when delivery through the regular mail will not meet the requestors' or senders' needs, such as for patient care...II. PROCEDURE Faxing Protected Health Information (PHI):..6. Care should be taken to assure the fax transmission is sent to the appropriate destination. Destination numbers should be pre-programmed into the fax machine, if possible, to eliminate errors in transmission from misdialing. The fax number on the screen of the fax machine should be checked to be sure it is correct prior to pressing the "send" button".A review of the facility Policy and Procedure for, "Workforce Confidentiality/Privacy and Appropriate Use of Facility Property", (no date), reveals the following: "C. Access and Use of Patient and Business Information...3. Workforce members are expected to adhere to the following guidelines in order to maintain security and confidentiality: a. Ensure recipients of confidential information are authorized to receive it. Verify identities of recipients before releasing any information".A review of the facility Policy and Procedure for, "Confidentiality of Patient Care Information", (10/10), reveals the following: "I. POLICY Persons receiving health care services have the right to expect that the confidentiality of individually identifiable medical information will be reasonably preserved. Information regarding the hospital's patients' medical or personal status will not be released or disclosed inappropriately...III. APPLICATION OF POLICY A. All patient-related information is confidential. It will be shared only with those persons that have a legal right (i.e. the patient or the patient's surrogate) or a legitimate work-related need to know".

Outcome:

Deficiency cited by the California Department of Public Health: Health & Safety Code 1280

Do you believe your privacy has been violated? Here’s what you can do: