Search Privacy Violations, Breaches and Complaints
This database was last updated in December 2015 ago and should only be used as a historical snapshot. More recent data on breaches affecting 500 or more people is available at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Breach Portal.
SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL
Cited by the California Department of Public Health for a violation of California’s Health and Safety Code relating to medical privacy during an inspection that began on August 11, 2014. Also cited in 35 other reports.
Report ID: NTDI11.01, California Department of Public Health
Reported Entity: SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL
Issue:
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the confidential treatment of protected health information (PHI) for Patient A, when a Radiology clerk (Employee 1) mailed a radiology report containing Patient A's PHI to Patient B. This failure resulted in an unauthorized release of PHI for Patient A.Finding:On August 14, 2014 at 9:20 AM, a phone interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing Operations (DNO) regarding an entity reported incident of a breach of PHI for Patient A. The DNO stated, "The employee was putting together reports when she inadvertently attached two reports of two different patients, Patient A and B together and mailed them to Patient B." The DNO further stated, "Two identifiers are to be used to check every page in a packet before mailing." During a review of the radiology report dated May 5, 2009, mailed to Patient B, the report contained Patient A's name, date of birth, visit number, x-ray number and transcribed radiology report.A review of the facility policy and procedure titled, "Confidentiality, Protecting Confidential Information," dated July, 2011, indicated, "Confidential information must be protected from unauthorized uses; disclosures....must be protected to prevent financial fraud and identity theft."The failure of Employee 1 to verify all pages of the report belonged to the intended recipient, Patient B, resulted in the unauthorized release of Patient A's PHI to Patient B.
Outcome:
Deficiency cited by the California Department of Public Health: Patients' Rights