Miseducation » California
All School Districts in California
6.28M Students | 283K Teachers | 1,557 Districts | 10.1K Schools | 26 Districts Under Desegregation Order
District Name | City | Nonwhite Students | Students Who Get Free/Reduced-Price Lunch | High School Graduation Rate | Opportunity (White students are this number of times as likely to be in an AP class, compared with Black students) | Discipline (Black students are this number of times as likely to be suspended, compared with White students) | Segregation Index (Between Black and White students) | Achievement Gap (Between Black and White students) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
San Miguel Joint Union Elementary School District | San Miguel | 65% | 67% | 0 Not Available |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
0 Not Available |
0 Not Available |
San Mateo Union High School District | San Mateo | 68% | 17% | 91% | 1.9x | 6.6x | 0 Not Available |
0 Not Available |
San Mateo-Foster City Elementary School District | Foster City | 74% | 25% | 0 Not Available |
0 Not available |
5.1x | Medium | 2.9 grades |
San Mateo County Office of Education District | Redwood City | 84% | 26% | Between 25% and 29% |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
0 Not Available |
0 Not Available |
San Marino Unified School District | San Marino | 75% | 4% | 97% |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
0 Not Available |
0 Not Available |
San Marcos Unified School District | San Marcos | 59% | 37% | 98% |
0 Not available |
4.5x | Medium | 1.5 grades |
San Luis Obispo County Office of Education District | San Luis Obispo | 77% | 74% | 78% |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
0 Not Available |
0 Not Available |
San Luis Coastal Unified School District | San Luis Obispo | 40% | 37% | 97% |
0 Not available |
7.5x | 0 Not Available |
0 Not Available |
San Lucas Union Elementary School District | San Lucas | 88% | 85% | 0 Not Available |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
0 Not Available |
0 Not Available |
San Lorenzo Valley Unified School District | Ben Lomond | 21% | 17% | Greater than 95% |
.5Less likely |
0 Not available |
0 Not Available |
0 Not Available |
San Lorenzo Unified School District | San Lorenzo | 91% | 68% | 88% | 2.2x | 2.4x | Medium | 1.6 grades |
San Leandro Unified School District | San Leandro | 91% | 64% | 90% |
0 Not available |
2.1x | Low | 1.9 grades |
San Juan Unified School District | Carmichael | 42% | 50% | 84% | 2.1x | 3.5x | Medium | 2.2 grades |
San Jose Unified School District | San Jose | 76% | 44% | 88% |
0 Not available |
3.1x | High | 2.4 grades |
SAN JOSE CONSERVATION CORPS CHARTER District | SAN JOSE | 99% | 68% | 0 Not Available |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
0 Not Available |
0 Not Available |
San Joaquin County Office of Education District | Stockton | 80% | 71% | 18% | 4.8x | 3.6x | Medium | 0 Not Available |
San Jacinto Unified School District | San Jacinto | 84% | 76% | 91% |
0 Not available |
2.5x | Low | 1.3 grades |
Sanger Unified School District | Sanger | 86% | 73% | 97% |
0 Not available |
2.1x | Medium | 0 Not Available |
San Gabriel Unified School District | San Gabriel | 95% | 54% | 91% |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
0 Not Available |
0 Not Available |
San Francisco Unified School District | San Francisco | 86% | 58% | 86% | 3x | 10x | High | 3.9 grades |
District Name | City | Nonwhite Students | Students Who Get Free/Reduced-Price Lunch | High School Graduation Rate | Opportunity (White students are this number of times as likely to be in an AP class, compared with Hispanic students) | Discipline (Hispanic students are this number of times as likely to be suspended, compared with White students) | Segregation Index (Between Hispanic and White students) | Achievement Gap (Between Hispanic and White students) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
San Miguel Joint Union Elementary School District | San Miguel | 65% | 67% | 0 Not Available |
0 Not available |
.5Less likely |
0 Not Available |
1.2 grades |
San Mateo Union High School District | San Mateo | 68% | 17% | 91% | 2.5x | 2.3x | Medium | 0 Not Available |
San Mateo-Foster City Elementary School District | Foster City | 74% | 25% | 0 Not Available |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
Medium | 3.2 grades |
San Mateo County Office of Education District | Redwood City | 84% | 26% | Between 25% and 29% |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
0 Not Available |
0 Not Available |
San Marino Unified School District | San Marino | 75% | 4% | 97% |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
0 Not Available |
1.4 grades |
San Marcos Unified School District | San Marcos | 59% | 37% | 98% | 1.4x | 1.6x | High | 2.3 grades |
San Luis Obispo County Office of Education District | San Luis Obispo | 77% | 74% | 78% |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
0 Not Available |
0 Not Available |
San Luis Coastal Unified School District | San Luis Obispo | 40% | 37% | 97% | 2.2x | 1.5x | Medium | 2.6 grades |
San Lucas Union Elementary School District | San Lucas | 88% | 85% | 0 Not Available |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
0 Not Available |
0 Not Available |
San Lorenzo Valley Unified School District | Ben Lomond | 21% | 17% | Greater than 95% |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
Low | 1.3 grades |
San Lorenzo Unified School District | San Lorenzo | 91% | 68% | 88% | 1.4x |
.5Less likely |
Medium | 1 grades |
San Leandro Unified School District | San Leandro | 91% | 64% | 90% |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
Medium | 1.6 grades |
San Juan Unified School District | Carmichael | 42% | 50% | 84% | 1.9x | 1.2x | Medium | 1.7 grades |
San Jose Unified School District | San Jose | 76% | 44% | 88% | 1.8x | 1.4x | High | 3.1 grades |
SAN JOSE CONSERVATION CORPS CHARTER District | SAN JOSE | 99% | 68% | 0 Not Available |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
0 Not Available |
0 Not Available |
San Joaquin County Office of Education District | Stockton | 80% | 71% | 18% |
.5Less likely |
1.6x | Low | 0 Not Available |
San Jacinto Unified School District | San Jacinto | 84% | 76% | 91% |
.5Less likely |
.5Less likely |
Low | 0.8 grades |
Sanger Unified School District | Sanger | 86% | 73% | 97% |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
High | 1.6 grades |
San Gabriel Unified School District | San Gabriel | 95% | 54% | 91% | 1.8x |
.5Less likely |
Medium | 2 grades |
San Francisco Unified School District | San Francisco | 86% | 58% | 86% | 2.6x | 1.9x | High | 3.3 grades |
District Name | City | Nonwhite Students | Students Who Get Free/Reduced-Price Lunch | High School Graduation Rate | Opportunity (White students are this number of times as likely to be in an AP class, compared with Two or More Races students) | Discipline (Two or More Races students are this number of times as likely to be suspended, compared with White students) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
San Miguel Joint Union Elementary School District | San Miguel | 65% | 67% | 0 Not Available |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
San Mateo Union High School District | San Mateo | 68% | 17% | 91% |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
San Mateo-Foster City Elementary School District | Foster City | 74% | 25% | 0 Not Available |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
San Mateo County Office of Education District | Redwood City | 84% | 26% | Between 25% and 29% |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
San Marino Unified School District | San Marino | 75% | 4% | 97% | 2.9x |
0 Not available |
San Marcos Unified School District | San Marcos | 59% | 37% | 98% | 1.5x |
0 Not available |
San Luis Obispo County Office of Education District | San Luis Obispo | 77% | 74% | 78% |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
San Luis Coastal Unified School District | San Luis Obispo | 40% | 37% | 97% |
0 Not available |
1.9x |
San Lucas Union Elementary School District | San Lucas | 88% | 85% | 0 Not Available |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
San Lorenzo Valley Unified School District | Ben Lomond | 21% | 17% | Greater than 95% |
0 Not available |
2x |
San Lorenzo Unified School District | San Lorenzo | 91% | 68% | 88% |
0 Not available |
1.8x |
San Leandro Unified School District | San Leandro | 91% | 64% | 90% |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
San Juan Unified School District | Carmichael | 42% | 50% | 84% |
0 Not available |
1.8x |
San Jose Unified School District | San Jose | 76% | 44% | 88% | 2.5x |
.5Less likely |
SAN JOSE CONSERVATION CORPS CHARTER District | SAN JOSE | 99% | 68% | 0 Not Available |
0 Not available |
0 Not available |
San Joaquin County Office of Education District | Stockton | 80% | 71% | 18% |
0 Not available |
1.7x |
San Jacinto Unified School District | San Jacinto | 84% | 76% | 91% |
0 Not available |
2.2x |
Sanger Unified School District | Sanger | 86% | 73% | 97% |
.5 No students of Two or More Races enrolled |
0 Not available |
San Gabriel Unified School District | San Gabriel | 95% | 54% | 91% |
.5 No students of Two or More Races enrolled |
.5 No students of Two or More Races suspended |
San Francisco Unified School District | San Francisco | 86% | 58% | 86% | 1.9x | 2.4x |
Sources & Notes
Sources: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights, Stanford University's Center for Education Policy Analysis, EDFacts, U.S. Department of Education’s Common Core of Data. Maps courtesy of Mapbox Community. Read our methodology →
Notes: The U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights occasionally updates the underlying dataset. ProPublica may update the interactive’s data in response.
Disparity scores are not available if there are too few students in a specific racial group to make a statistically significant calculation. They are also not available if data about a particular racial group was not reported. Some schools or districts reported an overcount of students in a disparity category (such as suspensions or AP courses) when compared with the total enrollment of that particular student group. In such cases, we also omit the disparity score.
Due to rounding, demographic breakdowns in composition charts may add up to more than 100 percent.
The racial categories we show data for are: Black, Hispanic, White, Asian/Pacific Islander or Native Hawaiian, Two or More Races, and Native American or Alaska Native. In some cases, we abbreviate the last three of these racial groups to Asian, Two+ Races, and Native Am.
Due to a technical issue with the Office for Civil Rights’ collection of data on sworn law enforcement officers in schools, the data for security staff may be an undercount.
As with any self-reported data, there may be errors in the federal Civil Rights Data Collection. Though districts are required to ensure the accuracy of their data, some may still report incorrect figures. Additionally, for some variables, the CRDC rounds the number of students for privacy reasons. In these cases, groups of students may represent a slight undercount or overcount.
Find errors? Have tips? Email [email protected].
Data specific to high school testing or high school level courses (including geometry, biology, calculus, AP enrollment, SAT testing rates, etc.) is calculated out of total high school enrollment, while data for other classes (such as eighth-grade algebra) is calculated out of total student enrollment. Read more about our data in our methodology →