Schedule K
(Form 990)
Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service
Supplemental Information on Tax Exempt Bonds
SchKMediumBullet Complete if the organization answered "Yes" to Form 990, Part IV, line 24a. Provide descriptions,
explanations, and any additional information in Part VI.
SchKMediumBullet Attach to Form 990. SchKMediumBullet See separate instructions.

OMB No. 1545-0047
2012
Open to Public
Inspection
Name of the organization
University of Notre Dame du Lac
 
Employer identification number
35-0868188
Part I
Bond Issues
(a) Issuer name (b) Issuer EIN (c) CUSIP # (d) Date issued (e) Issue price (f) Description of purpose (g) Defeased (h) On
behalf of
issuer
(i) Pool
financing
Yes No Yes No Yes No
A St Joseph County Indiana
 
35-6000194 79061ABD8 12-16-2003 65,000,000 See Part VI   X   X   X
B St Joseph County Indiana
 
35-6000194 79061ABA4 12-08-2005 185,000,000 See Part VI   X   X   X
C St Joseph County Indiana
 
35-6000194 79061ABE6 12-14-2007 75,000,000 See Part VI   X   X   X
D St Joseph County Indiana
 
35-6000194 79061ABK2 09-30-2009 153,953,342 See Part VI   X   X   X
Part II
Proceeds
A B C D
1 Amount of bonds retired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,340,000 110,000,000    
2 Amount of bonds legally defeased . . . . . . . . . . .        
3 Total proceeds of issue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65,326,176 188,456,420 75,546,119 153,953,386
4 Gross proceeds in reserve funds . . . . . . . . . . . .        
5 Capitalized interest from proceeds . . . . . . . . . . . 510,157 2,389,124 261,689  
6 Proceeds in refunding escrows . . . . . . . . . . . .        
7 Issuance costs from proceeds . . . . . . . . . . . . 333,733 370,716 246,545 953,386
8 Credit enhancement from proceeds . . . . . . . . . . .        
9 Working capital expenditures from proceeds . . . . . . . . .        
10 Capital expenditures from proceeds . . . . . . . . . . . 29,389,306 70,348,646 24,337,420  
11 Other spent proceeds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,092,980 115,347,934 50,700,465 153,000,000
12 Other unspent proceeds . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        
13 Year of substantial completion . . . . . . . . . . . . 2007 2010 2012
Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
14 Were the bonds issued as part of a current refunding issue? . . . . . X   X   X   X  
15 Were the bonds issued as part of an advance refunding issue? . . . . .   X   X   X   X
16 Has the final allocation of proceeds been made? . . . . . . . . X   X   X     X
17 Does the organization maintain adequate books and records to support the final allocation of proceeds? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X   X   X   X  
Part III
Private Business Use
A B C D
Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
1 Was the organization a partner in a partnership, or a member of an LLC, which owned property financed by tax-exempt bonds? . . . . . . .   X   X   X   X
2 Are there any lease arrangements that may result in private business use of bond-financed property? . . . . . . . . . X   X   X     X
For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the Instructions for Form 990.
Cat. No. 50193E
Schedule K (Form 990) 2012
Page 2
Schedule K (Form 990) 2012
Page 2
Part III
Private Business Use (Continued)
A B C D
Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
3a Are there any management or service contracts that may result in private business use of bond-financed property? . . . . . . . . . . . . X   X   X     X
b If "Yes" to line 3a, does the organization routinely engage bond counsel or other outside counsel to review any management or service contracts relating to the financed property? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X   X   X      
c Are there any research agreements that may result in private business use of bond-financed property? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X   X   X     X
d If "Yes" to line 3c, does the organization routinely engage bond counsel or other outside counsel to review any research agreements relating to the financed property? . X   X   X      
4 Enter the percentage of financed property used in a private business use by entities other than a section 501(c)(3) organization or a state or local government . . SchKMediumBullet 0% 0% 0%   %
5 Enter the percentage of financed property used in a private business use as a result of unrelated trade or business activity carried on by your organization, another section 501(c)(3) organization, or a state or local government . . . . . . . SchKMediumBullet 0% 0% 0%   %
6 Total of lines 4 and 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0% 0% 0%   %
7 Does the bond issue meet the private security or payment test? . . . . .   X   X   X   X
8a Has there been a sale or disposition of any of the bond financed property to a nongovernmental person other than a 501(c)(3) organization since the bonds were issued?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   X   X   X   X
b If “Yes” to line 8a, enter the percentage of bond-financed property sold or disposed of.   %   %   %   %
c If “Yes” to line 8a, was any remedial action taken pursuant to Regulations sections 1.141-12 and 1.145-2? . . . . . . . . . . . . .                
9 Has the organization established written procedures to ensure that all nonqualified bonds of the issue are remediated in accordance with the requirements under
Regulations sections 1.141-12 and 1.145-2?
X   X   X   X  
Part IV
Arbitrage
A B C D
Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
1 Has the issuer filed Form 8038-T? . . . . .   X   X   X   X
2 If "No" to line 1, did the following apply? . . . .
a Rebate not due yet? . . . . . . . .   X   X   X   X
b Exception to rebate? . . . . . . . . X   X   X   X  
c No rebate due? . . . . . . . . . .
  X   X   X   X
If you checked "No rebate due" in line 2c, provide in Part VI the date the rebate computation was performed
3 Is the bond issue a variable rate issue? . . . . X   X   X     X
4a Has the organization or the governmental issuer entered into a qualified hedge with respect to the bond issue? X   X   X     X
b Name of provider . . . . . . . . . See Part VI
 
Goldman Sachs
 
See Part VI
 
 
 
c Term of hedge . . . . . . . . . . 25.000000000000 25.000000000000    
d Was the hedge superintegrated? . . . . . .   X   X   X   X
e Was a hedge terminated? . . . . . . .   X   X   X   X
Schedule K (Form 990) 2012
Page 3
Schedule K (Form 990) 2012
Page 3
Part IV
Arbitrage (Continued)
A B C D
Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
5a Were gross proceeds invested in a guaranteed investment contract (GIC)? . . . . . . . . .   X X     X   X
b Name of provider . . . . . . . . . NA
 
See Part VI
 
NA
 
NA
 
c Term of GIC . . . . . . . . . .        
d Was the regulatory safe harbor for establishing the fair market value of the GIC satisfied? . . . . .   X X     X   X
6 Were any gross proceeds invested beyond an available temporary period? . . . . . . . .   X   X   X   X
7 Has the organization established written procedures to monitor the requirements of section 148? . . . X   X   X   X  
Part V
Procedures To Undertake Corrective Action
A B C D
Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
1 Has the organization established written procedures to ensure that violations of federal tax requirements are timely identified and corrected through the voluntary closing agreement program if self-remediation is not available under applicable regulations? X   X   X   X  
Part VI
Supplemental Information. Complete this part to provide additional information for responses to questions on Schedule K (see instructions).
Identifier Return Reference Explanation
Part I Bond Issues (f) Description of Purpose (A) $65,000,000 St. Joseph County, Indiana Variable Rate Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2003 originally issued on December 16, 2003. Bond proceeds were utilized to refund the Indiana Educational Facilities Authority Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 1992 dated November 5, 1992 and to refund the Indiana Educational Facilities Authority Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 1994 dated November 30, 1994. Proceeds were also applied to finance and reimburse a portion of the costs of various campus improvements. Those improvements include (i) construction of a performing arts center and science learning center, (ii) general repairs and improvements to the Alumni and Dillon Residence Halls, (iii) renovation and improvements to utility infrastructure, and (iv) general construction and renovation projects. (B) $185,000,000 St. Joseph County, Indiana Variable Rate Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2005 originally issued on December 8, 2005, with CUSIP number 79061ABA4 (reflected in Part I (c) and (d)). $75,000,000 of the Series 2005 Bonds were then converted from a weekly rate period to a term rate period commencing November 6, 2008, with a new CUSIP number 79061ABF3 and ending February 29, 2012. $75,000,000 of the Series 2005 Bonds were then converted from a term rate period to a weekly rate period commencing on March 1, 2012. $110,000,000 of the Series 2005 Bonds were refunded by the St. Joseph County Series 2009 Bonds (see Part I (D)). Bond proceeds were used to refund the Indiana Health and Educational Facility Financing Authority Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 1995 dated August 9, 1995, to refund the St. Joseph County, Indiana Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 1996 dated September 12, 1996, and to refund a portion of the St. Joseph County, Indiana Variable Rate Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 dated March 5, 2002. Proceeds were also utilized to finance and reimburse a portion of the costs of various campus improvements. Those improvements include (i) the construction of new roads along the south and east boundaries of the University's campus and the realignment of Angela Boulevard, Edison Road and Ivy Road in connection therewith, and the closing of Juniper Road, (ii) renovation and improvements to the Student Health Center, (iii) repair and regilding of the dome on top of the Administration Building, (iv) renovation and improvements to laboratory facilities within the Galvin Life Science Building, (v) general construction and renovation projects. (C) $75,000,000 St. Joseph County, Indiana Educational Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2007 originally issued on December 14, 2007. Bond proceeds were utilized to refund the St. Joseph County, Indiana Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 1997 dated November 20, 1997, and to refund the Indiana Educational Facilities Authority Educational Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 1997 dated November 19, 1997. Proceeds were also applied to finance and reimburse a portion of the costs of various campus improvements. These improvements include (i) the construction of an addition to the Mason Support Services Center, (ii) the renovation and improvements to a laboratory facility within Nieuwland Science, (iii) general construction and renovation projects. (D) Total issue price of $153,953,341.65, comprised of an original issue premium of $7,388,341.65 and principal amount of $146,565,000 St. Joseph County, Indiana Educational Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2009 issued on September 30, 2009. Bond proceeds were used to refund the St. Joseph County, Indiana Variable Rate Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 1998 dated October 1, 1998 and ($110,000,000 of) the St. Joseph County, Indiana Variable Rate Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2005 dated December 8, 2005 (see Part I (B)).
Part II Proceeds Line 1 Amount of bonds retired Line 1 (B) Reflects the amount of the Series 2005 Bonds refunded by the Series 2009 Bonds Line 3 Total proceeds of issue Line 3 (A), (B), (C), (D) - Amount reported on Line 3 includes investment earnings and as a result, does not agree to issue price listed on Part I. Line 3 (B) The original par amount of the Series 2005 Bonds was $185,000,000. The amount reported includes the $185,000,000 par plus investment earnings. $110,000,000 was later refunded as part of the Series 2009 bonds. $75,000,000 remain outstanding as the Series 2005 Bonds. Line 3 (D) The Series 2009 Bonds refunded the Series 1998 Bonds ($43,000,000) and a portion of the Series 2005 Bonds ($110,000,000 of $185,000,000). This amount reported includes the original issue price of $153,953,341.65 (including the original issue premium of $7,388,341.65, a portion of which is amortized each year) plus investment earnings of $44.66. Line 5 Capitalized interest from proceeds Line 5 (A) Includes capitalized interest and swap payments Line 10 Capital expenditures from proceeds Line 10 (D) The Series 2009 Bonds was a refunding issue that did not fund capital expenditures Line 11 Other spent proceeds Line 11 (A), (B), (C), (D) Includes refunded bonds Line 11 (B) Also includes capitalized line of credit fees that were not taken into account in determining the yield on the issue (per the Schedule K instructions) Line 13 Year of substantial completion Line 13 (D) Bonds only refunded previous issues and did not finance capital expenditures. Therefore, response was left blank. Line 16 Has the final allocation of proceeds been made? Line 16 (A), (B), (C) The University's intent upon issuance of the bonds was that equity contributions would first be allocated to any potential private business use in the financed facilities. Line 16 (D) Bonds only refunded previous issues and did not finance capital expenditures. Therefore, response was indicated as "NO".
Part III Private Business Use   Line 2 (D) The Series 2009 Bonds refunded the Series 1998 and a portion of the Series 2005 Bonds. Schedule K does not require consideration of the projects financed by the Series 1998 Bonds. The Series 2005 Bond projects are considered and reflected in Column B of this Schedule. Therefore, response was indicated as "NO". Line 3a (D) The Series 2009 Bonds refunded the Series 1998 and a portion of the Series 2005 Bonds. Schedule K does not require consideration of the projects financed by the Series 1998 Bonds. The Series 2005 Bond projects are considered and reflected in Column B of this Schedule. Therefore, response was indicated as "NO". Line 3c (D) The Series 2009 Bonds refunded the Series 1998 and a portion of the Series 2005 Bonds. Schedule K does not require consideration of the projects financed by the Series 1998 Bonds. The Series 2005 Bond projects are considered and reflected in Column B of this Schedule. Therefore, response was indicated as "NO". Line 3b & 3d (A), (B), (C) Internal General Counsel routinely reviews agreements. External counsel occasionally engaged to review agreements. Line 3b & 3d (D) The Series 2009 Bonds refunded the Series 1998 and a portion of the Series 2005 Bonds. Schedule K does not require consideration of the projects financed by the Series 1998 Bonds. The Series 2005 Bond projects are considered and reflected in Column B of this Schedule. Therefore, response was left blank. Line 4 (A), (B), (C) The University reported the private business use percentages in Part III of Schedule K after reviewing the private business activity on campus. The University's intent upon issuance of the bonds was that equity contributions would first be allocated to any potential private business use in the financed facilities. The University financed a number of infrastructure/renovation projects that met the criteria as Qualified Improvement Exceptions. Line 4 (D) The Series 2009 Bonds refunded the Series 1998 and a portion of the Series 2005 Bonds. Schedule K does not require consideration of the projects financed by the Series 1998 Bonds. The Series 2005 Bond projects are considered and reflected in Column B of this Schedule. Therefore, response was left blank. Line 5 (A), (B), (C) The University reported the private business use percentages in Part III of Schedule K after reviewing the private business activity on campus. The University's intent upon issuance of the bonds was that equity contributions would first be allocated to any potential private business use in the financed facilities. The University financed a number of infrastructure/renovation projects that met the criteria as Qualified Improvement Exceptions. Line 5 (D) The Series 2009 Bonds refunded the Series 1998 and a portion of the Series 2005 Bonds. Schedule K does not require consideration of the projects financed by the Series 1998 Bonds. The Series 2005 Bond proje cts are considered and reflected in Column B of this Schedule. Therefore, response was left blank.
Part IV Arbitrage   Line 2 a, b, c (A) The University met the spend-down requirement for the Series 2003 Bonds and qualified for an exception to rebate. Line 2 a, b, c (B) The University met the spend-down requirement for the Series 2005 Bonds and qualified for an exception to rebate. Line 2 a, b, c (C) The University met the spend-down requirement for the Series 2007 Bonds and qualified for an exception to rebate. Line 2 a, b, c (D) The Series 2009 Bonds refunded the University's Series 1998 Bonds and a portion of the Series 2005 Bonds. The Series 1998 Bonds met the spend-down requirement, thereby qualifying for an exception to rebate. The Series 2005 Bonds are reflected in Column B and also qualified for an exception to rebate based on meeting the spend-down requirement. Line 4b (A) Name of provider: Goldman Sachs Line 4c (A) Term of hedge: 19.0 years Line 4b (A) Name of provider: HSBC Line 4c (A) Term of hedge: 29.2 years Line 4b (C) Name of provider: Goldman Sachs Line 4c (C) Term of hedge: 19.0 years Line 4b (C) Name of provider: HSBC Line 4c (C) Term of hedge: 29.2 years Line 5b (B) Name of provider: AIG Matched Funding Corp Line 5c (B) Term of GIC: 0.2 years Line 5b (B) Name of provider: AIG Matched Funding Corp Line 5c (B) Term of GIC: 2.0 years
Schedule K (Form 990) 2012

Additional Data


Software ID:  
Software Version: