H.R.3288: Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010

The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 111-218, by Mr. Olver.

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 119.

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 669 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3288 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be read by paragraph. A specified amendment is in order. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI.

Rule H. Res. 669 passed House.

Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 669.

Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3288 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be read by paragraph. A specified amendment is in order. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI.

House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 669 and Rule XVIII.

The Speaker designated the Honorable Vic Snyder to act as Chairman of the Committee.

GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 3288.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Olver amendment.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hensarling amendment.

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Hensarling amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Hensarling demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Latham amendment.

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Latham amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Latham demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the McHenry amendment.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Cao amendment.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Frelinghuysen amendment.

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Frelinghuysen amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Frelinghuysen demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Blackburn amendment.

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Blackburn amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mrs. Blackburn demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jordan amendment.

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jordan amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Jordan demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Neugebauer amendment.

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Neugebauer amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Neugebauer demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Stearns amendment.

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Stearns amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Stearns demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Turner amendment.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Rangel amendment.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Flake amendment No. 1.

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Flake amendment No. 1, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Flake demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Flake amendment No. 4.

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Flake amendment No. 4, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Flake demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Flake amendment No. 7.

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Flake amendment No. 7, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Flake demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Flake amendment No. 8.

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Flake amendment No. 8, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Flake demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Flake amendment No. 9.

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Flake amendment No. 9, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Flake demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Flake amendment No. 10.

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Flake amendment No. 10, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Flake demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Flake amendment No. 11.

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Flake amendment No. 11, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Flake demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hensarling amendment No. 3.

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Hensarling amendment No. 3, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Hensarling demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 669, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hensarling amendment No. 4.

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Hensarling amendment No. 4, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Hensarling demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.

The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 3288.

The House adopted the amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.

The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

Mr. Latham moved to recommit with instructions to Appropriations.

Motion to recommit with instructions withdrawn.

DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Latham motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to report the bill back to the House with an amendment to make reductions in the appropriations for the Department of Transportation, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and other related agencies.

The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.

On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 192 - 226 (Roll no. 636).

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 256 - 168 (Roll no. 637).

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Committee on Appropriations. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.

Committee on Appropriations. Reported by Senator Murray with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 111-69.

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 153.

Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent.

Considered by Senate.

Considered by Senate.

Considered by Senate.

Cloture motion on the committee reported substitute amendment presented in Senate.

Cloture motion on the bill presented in Senate.

Considered by Senate.

Motion by Senator Ensign to recommit to Senate Committee on Appropriations with instructions made in Senate.

Motion by Senator Ensign to recommit to Senate Committee on Appropriations with instructions rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 33 - 64. Record Vote Number: 282.

Motion by Senator Kyl to recommit to Senate Committee on Appropriations with instructions that the committee report back forthwith with the following amendment (SA 2421) made in Senate.

Cloture motion on the committee reported substitute amendment withdrawn by unanimous consent in Senate.

Cloture motion on the bill withdrawn by unanimous consent in Senate.

Considered by Senate.

Motion by Senator Kyl to recommit to Senate Committee on Appropriations with instructions that the committee report back forthwith with the following amendment (SA 2421) rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 34 - 64. Record Vote Number: 286.

The committee substitute as amended agreed to by Unanimous Consent.

Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 73 - 25. Record Vote Number: 287.

Senate insists on its amendment, asks for a conference, appoints conferees Murray; Byrd; Mikulski; Kohl; Durbin; Dorgan; Leahy; Harkin; Feinstein; Johnson; Lautenberg; Specter; Inouye; Bond; Shelby; Bennett; Hutchison; Brownback; Alexander; Collins; Voinovich; Cochran.

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Mr. Olver moved that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference.

On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference Agreed to by voice vote.

Mr. Latham moved that the House instruct conferees.

DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Latham motion to instruct conferees on H.R. 3288. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the managers on the part of the House to disagree to any proposition in violation of clause 9 of Rule XXII which includes matter not committed to the conference committee by either House. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the managers on the part of the House to not record their approval of the final conference agreement unless text of such agreement has been available to the managers in an electronic, searchable, and downloadable form for at least 72 hours prior to the time described in clause 12(a)(4) of rule XXII of the Rules of the House of Representatives.

The previous question on the motion that the House instruct conferees was ordered without objection.

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the motion to instruct conferees on H.R. 3288, the Chair put the question on adoption of the motion to instruct conferees and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Latham demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the motion to instruct conferees on H.R. 3288 until a time to be announced.

On motion that the House instruct conferees Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 212 - 193 (Roll no. 931).

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

The Speaker appointed conferees: Olver, Pastor (AZ), Kaptur, Price (NC), Roybal-Allard, Berry, Kilpatrick (MI), Lowey, Obey, Latham, Wolf, Tiahrt, Wamp, and Lewis (CA).

Conferees agreed to file conference report.

Conference report H. Rept. 111-366 filed.

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 961 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to H.R. 3288 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived.

Rule H. Res. 961 passed House.

Mr. Olver brought up conference report H. Rept. 111-366 for consideration under the provisions of H. Res. 961.

DEBATE - The House proceeded with 1 hour of debate on the conference report to accompany H.R. 3288.

The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 221 - 202, 1 Present (Roll no. 949).

Conference papers: Senate report and manager's statement and message on House action held at the desk in Senate.

Motion to proceed to consideration of conference report to H.R. 3288 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 56 - 43. Record Vote Number: 371.

Conference report considered in Senate.

Cloture motion on the conference report to accompany H.R. 3288 presented in Senate.

Conference report considered in Senate.

Point of order that the conference report violates Rule XXVIII raised in Senate.

Motion to waive Rule XXVIII with respect to the conference report made in Senate.

Motion to waive Rule XXVIII with respect to the conference report agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 60 - 36. Record Vote Number: 372.

Conference report considered in Senate.

Cloture on the conference report to accompany H.R. 3288 invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 60 - 34. Record Vote Number: 373.

Conference report considered in Senate.

Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 57 - 35. Record Vote Number: 374.

Cleared for White House.

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Presented to President.

Signed by President.

Became Public Law No: 111-117.