H.R.384: TARP Reform and Accountability Act of 2009

About This Bill

  • This bill was introduced in the 111th Congress
  • This bill is primarily about finance and financial sector
  • Introduced Jan. 9, 2009
  • Latest Major Action Jan. 22, 2009

Bill Summary

TARP Reform and Accountability Act of 2009 - Amends the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) to direct the Secretary of the Treasury to require specified depository institutions under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) to report periodically on their use of TARP assistance.Requires the Secretary to incorporate within the TARP assistance agreement how the funds are to be used and the benchmarks an institution must meet in...

(Source: Library of Congress)

What Lawmakers Are Saying About This Bill

There are 7 statements associated with H.R.384.

Congressional Budget Office Estimate

The Congressional Budget Office has produced a cost estimate for H.R.384.

Bill Actions

Date Description
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to House Financial Services
Referred to House Ways and Means
Referred to House Judiciary
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 53 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 384 with 2 hours of general debate. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments. The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the bill except those arising under clause 9 of rule XXI. The resolution provides that the Committee of the Whole shall rise without motion after general debate and that no further consideration of the bill shall occur except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House.
Rule H. Res. 53 passed House.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 53.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 384 with 2 hours of general debate. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments. The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the bill except those arising under clause 9 of rule XXI. The resolution provides that the Committee of the Whole shall rise without motion after general debate and that no further consideration of the bill shall occur except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House.
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 53 and Rule XVIII.
The Speaker designated the Honorable John T. Salazar to act as Chairman of the Committee.
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with two hour of general debate on H.R. 384.
Mr. Frank (MA) moved that the Committee rise.
On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 384 as unfinished business.
Considered as unfinished business.
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole resumed general debate on H.R. 384.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 62 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 384. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. The resolution provides for further consideration of H.R. 384 with no further general debate.
Rule H. Res. 62 passed House.
Considered as unfinished business.
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 62, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 40 minutes of debate on the Frank amendment.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Frank amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Frank demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 62, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Matsui amendment.
DEBATE - Purusuant to the provisions of H. Res. 62, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the Hensarling amendment.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Hensarling amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Hensarling demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
The Committee of the Whole rose informally to receive a message from the President.
Subsequently, the Committee resumed it's sitting.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 62, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the Holt amendment.
Mr. Holt asked unanimous consent to modify his amendment. Objection was heard.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 62 the Committee of the Whole proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the Bachmann amendment.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of the Bachmann amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Bachmann demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 62, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the Patrick Murphy amendment.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Patrick Murphy amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Patrick Murphy demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question on adoption of amendments which were debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 384 as unfinished business.
Considered as unfinished business.
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 62, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Myrick amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 62, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Frank (MA) amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 62, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Flake amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 62, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hinchey amendment.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Hinchey amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Hinchey demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 384 as unfinished business.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 384.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
Mr. Gohmert moved to recommit with instructions to Financial Services.
Mr. Frank (MA) raised a point of order against the motion to recommit with instructions. Mr. Frank stated that the provisions of the motion to recommit exceed the scope of the bill and the motion to recommit is therefore, not germane. Sustained by the Chair.
Point of order sustained against the motion to recommit with instructions.
Mr. Gohmert appealed the ruling of the chair. The question was then put on sustaining the ruling of the chair.
Mr. Frank (MA) moved to table appeal of the ruling of the chair.
On motion to table appeal of the ruling of the chair Agreed to by recorded vote: 251 - 176 (Roll no. 24).
Mr. Barrett (SC) moved to recommit with instructions to Financial Services.
Floor summary: DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Barrett (SC) motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment pertaining to provisions dealing with Title I- TARP Terminiation and Full Repayment Plan.
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 199 - 228 (Roll no. 25).
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 260 - 166 (Roll no. 26).
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 384.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Jan. 9, 2009

Introduced in the House by Barney Frank (D-Mass.)

Close Comment Creative Commons Donate Email Facebook Mobile Phone Podcast Print Google News logo Google_NewsInitiative_Lockup_FullColor RSS Search Search Twitter WhatsApp Resolving differences Check Building Arrow right Info circle Oops OOPS Pencil File text Bars Search Close Cogs Filter Compare Revolving Door Info card Activity Member menu Globe Document External link Quote News Calendar No Vote
Current site Current page