Legislators
Bills
Statements
Lobbying
Travel
Searching...- Bills
- H.R.10
H.R.10: Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2011
About This Bill
- This bill was introduced in the 112th Congress
- This bill is primarily about government operations and politics
- Introduced Jan. 20, 2011
- Latest Major Action Dec. 8, 2011
- See the seven similar bills introduced in other congresses.
Bill Sponsor
Bill Cosponsors
206 (2 Democrats, 204 Republicans)
Bill Summary
Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2011 - (Sec. 2) States that the purpose of this Act is to increase accountability for and transparency in the federal regulatory process by requiring Congress to approve all new major regulations. (Sec. 3) Revises provisions relating to congressional review of agency rulemaking to require a federal agency promulgating a rule to include in its report to Congress and to the Comptroller...
(Source: Library of Congress)
What Lawmakers Are Saying About This Bill
Congressional Budget Office Estimate
Bill Actions
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
|
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
|
|
|
Referred to House Judiciary
|
|
|
Referred to House Rules
|
|
|
Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, Commercial and Administrative Law.
|
|
|
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
|
|
|
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
|
|
|
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 22 - 14.
|
|
|
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 112-278, Part I.
|
|
|
House Committee on Rules Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than Nov. 22, 2011.
|
|
|
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Rules. H. Rept. 112-278, Part II.
|
|
|
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 192.
|
|
|
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 479 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 10 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the bill. The resolution waives all points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended.
|
|
|
Rule H. Res. 479 passed House.
|
|
|
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 479.
|
|
|
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 10 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the bill. The resolution waives all points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended.
|
|
|
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 479 and Rule XVIII.
|
|
|
The Speaker designated the Honorable Jeff Denham to act as Chairman of the Committee.
|
|
|
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 10.
|
|
|
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 479, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Sessions Part B amendment No. 1.
|
|
|
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 479, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Johnson (GA) Part B amendment No. 2.
|
|
|
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Johnson (GA) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Johnson (GA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
|
|
|
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 479, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Schrader Part B amendment No. 3.
|
|
|
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Schrader amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Schrader demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
|
|
|
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 479, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the McKinley Part B amendment No. 4.
|
|
|
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 479, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the McCarthy (NY) Part B amendment No. 5.
|
|
|
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the McCarthy (NY) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mrs. McCarthy (NY) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
|
|
|
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 479, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee (TX) Part B amendment No. 6.
|
|
|
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee (TX) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Ms. Jackson Lee (TX) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
|
|
|
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 479, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Moore Part B amendment No. 7.
|
|
|
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Moore amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Ms. Moore demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
|
|
|
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was on the question of adoption of amendments which were debated earlier and on which further proceedings were postponed.
|
|
|
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 10.
|
|
|
The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
|
|
|
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
|
|
|
Ms. DeLauro moved to recommit with instructions to Judiciary.
|
|
|
Floor summary: DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the DeLauro motion to recommit. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment to insert a provision entitled "Protection of Food Safety and Consumer's Right to Know through Country-of-Origin Labeling".
|
|
|
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
|
|
|
On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 183 - 235 (Roll no. 900).
|
|
|
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 241 - 184 (Roll no. 901).
|
|
|
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
|
|
|
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
|
|
| Jan. 20, 2011 |
Introduced in the House by Geoff Davis (R-Ky.) |