Represent

Donate

H.R.2219: Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2012

About This Bill

  • This bill was introduced in the 112th Congress
  • This bill is primarily about armed forces and national security
  • Introduced June 16, 2011
  • Latest Major Action Sept. 15, 2011

Bill Summary

Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2012 - Title I: Military Personnel - Appropriates funds for FY2012 for active-duty and reserve personnel in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force (the military departments), and for National Guard personnel in the Army and Air Force. Title II: Operation and Maintenance - Appropriates funds for FY2012 for operation and maintenance (O&M) for the military departments, the defense agencies, the...

(Source: Library of Congress)

What Lawmakers Are Saying About This Bill

There are 3 statements associated with H.R.2219.
See statements

Bill Actions

Date Description
The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 112-110, by Mr. Young (FL).
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 64.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 320 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2219 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be read by paragraph. Bill is open to amendments. Points of order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived.
Rule H. Res. 320 passed House.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 320.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2219 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be read by paragraph. Bill is open to amendments. Points of order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived.
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 320 and Rule XVIII.
The Speaker designated the Honorable Lynn A. Westmoreland to act as Chairman of the Committee.
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 2219.
Mr. Young (FL) moved that the Committee rise.
On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 2219 as unfinished business.
Considered as unfinished business.
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Connolly (VA) amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Connolly (VA) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Connolly (VA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Broun (GA) amendment No. 23 under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Broun (GA) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Broun (GA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Connolly (VA) amendment No. 9 under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Kucinich amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Kucinich amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Kucinich demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Jackson Lee (TX) amendment No. 69 under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Jackson Lee (TX) amendment No. 67 under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Broun (GA) amendment No. 24 under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Broun (GA) amendment No. 25 under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Broun (GA) amendment No. 26 under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceededwith debate on the Broun (GA) amendment No. 21 under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Welch amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Welch amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Welch demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Broun (GA) amendment under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Stearns amendment under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Sessions amendment under the 5-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Amash amendment under the 5-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Amash amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Dicks demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Sutton amendment under the 5-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Sessions amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Dicks demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Carter amendment under the 5-minute rule.
Mr. Young (FL) moved that the Committee now rise.
On motion that the Committee now rise Agreed to by voice vote.
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 2219 as unfinished business.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was on the adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings were postponed.
VACATING DEMANDS FOR ROLL CALLS - Mr. Broun of Georgia asked unanimous consent to vacate the demands for recorded votes on amendment Nos. 21 and 22 which had been debated earlier and that the disposition of each amendment stand as decided by the voice votes thereon. Agreed to without objection.
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with pro forma amendments to H.R. 2219.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Boswell amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Lee (CA) amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order. Subsequently, the reservation was withdrawn.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Lee (CA) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Ms. Lee (CA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Garamendi amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Garamendi amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Mr. Garamendi demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Welch amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Nadler amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Nadler amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Nadler demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Poe (TX) amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Poe (TX) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Poe (TX) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Lee (CA) amendment under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Cohen amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Cohen amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Mr. Cohen demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Cicilline amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Cicilline amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Mr. Cicilline demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Clarke (MI) amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Holt amendment under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Poe (TX) amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Poe (TX) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Mr. Poe (TX) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the McCollum amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the McCollum amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Ms. McCollum demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Mr. Young (FL) moved that the Committee rise.
On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
Considered as unfinished business.
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Cole amendment No. 13 under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Cole amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Cole demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Amash amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Amash amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Dicks demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was on the question of adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings were postponed.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Rigell amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Amash amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Mr. Rigell demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Norton amendment under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Foxx amendment under the five-minute rule.
On agreeing to the Foxx amendment (A041) Agreed to by voice vote.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Michaud amendment under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Eshoo amendment under the five-minute rule pending reservation of a point of order.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Mulvaney amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Amash amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Mulvaney demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Bass(CA) amendment under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Runyan amendment under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Sherman amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Amash amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Sherman demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Rohrabacher amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Rohrabacher amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Rohrabacher demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
VACATING PROCEEDINGS - Mr. Bishop of Utah asked unanimous consent that the voice vote by which amendment No. 61 offered by Ms. Foxx was adopted be vacated to the end that the Chair put the question de novo. Agreed to without objection.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - Pursuant to the unanimous consent request just agreed to, the Chair put the question on adoption of the Foxx amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Dicks demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Gohmert amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Gohmert amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Gohmert demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Engel amendment under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Neugebauer amendment No. 89 under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on pro forma amendments to H.R. 2219.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Gosar amendment under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Welch (VT) amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Welch (VT) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Kingston demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Flores amendment No. 30 under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Welch (VT) amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Cole (OK) amendment No. 4 under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Cole (OK) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Visclosky demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Frank (MA) amendment No. 97 under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Frank (MA) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Frank (MA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Fortenberry amendment under the five-minute rule.
Mr. Young (FL) moved that the Committee now rise.
On motion that the Committee now rise Agreed to by voice vote.
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 2219 as unfinished business.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the DeFazio amendment no. 96 under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Flake amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Flake amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Mr. Flake demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Conyers amendment under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Kinzinger amendment under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole Proceeded with debate on the Lee (CA) amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Lee (CA) amendment under the five-minute rule, pending the reservation of a point of order.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Huelskamp amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Huelskamp amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Huelskamp demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Tonko amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceed with debate on the Polis amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Polis amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Polis demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Murphy (CT) amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Herrera Buetler amendment under the five-minute rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Lewis (GA) amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
Mr. Young (FL) moved that the Committee rise.
On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
Considered as unfinished business.
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions H. Res. 320, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Kucinich amendment under the five-minute rule.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Kucinich amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Kucinich demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question on adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
Mr. Young (FL) moved for the Committee of the Whole to rise and report.
On motion to rise and report Agreed to by voice vote.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 2219.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
The House adopted the amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
Mr. Barrow moved to recommit with instructions to Appropriations.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Barrow motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment to increase funds for the Department of Defense-Wide Yellow Ribbon Program by $200 million.
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 188 - 234 (Roll no. 531).
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 336 - 87 (Roll no. 532).
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Committee on Appropriations. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Committee on Appropriations. Reported by Senator Inouye with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 112-77.
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 169.
June 16, 2011

Introduced in the House by C. W. Bill Young (R-Fla.)

Close Comment Creative Commons Donate Email Facebook Mobile Phone Podcast Print Google News logo Google_NewsInitiative_Lockup_FullColor RSS Search Search Twitter WhatsApp Resolving differences Check Building Arrow right Info circle Oops OOPS Pencil File text Bars Search Close Cogs Filter Compare Revolving Door Info card Activity Member menu Globe Document External link Quote News Calendar No Vote
Current site Current page