Legislators
Bills
Statements
Lobbying
Travel
- Bills
- H.R.5781
H.R.5781: California Emergency Drought Relief Act of 2014
About This Bill
- This bill was introduced in the 113th Congress
- This bill is primarily about water resources development
- Introduced Dec. 2, 2014
- Latest Major Action Dec. 10, 2014
Bill Sponsor
Bill Cosponsors
7 (1 Democrat, 6 Republicans)
Bill Summary
California Emergency Drought Relief Act of 2014 - Title I: California Emergency Drought Relief - (Sec. 102) Grants the Secretaries of Commerce and the Interior (Secretaries) emergency authority, subject to existing priorities of individuals and entities, to direct the operations of the Central Valley Project (CVP) and allow the State Water Project (SWP) operated by the California Department of Water Resources to provide the maximum quantity of...
(Source: Library of Congress)
What Lawmakers Are Saying About This Bill
Congressional Budget Office Estimate
Bill Actions
Date | Description |
---|---|
Dec. 10, 2014 |
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
|
Dec. 9, 2014 |
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
|
Dec. 9, 2014 |
Vote in the HouseOn passage Passed by recorded vote: 230 - 182 (Roll no. 553). (text: CR 12/08/2014 H8826-8829) |
Dec. 9, 2014 |
Vote in the HouseOn motion to recommit with instructions Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 182 - 228 (Roll no. 552). |
Dec. 9, 2014 |
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H8887-8888)
|
Dec. 9, 2014 |
Floor summary: DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the George Miller (CA) motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment to ensure that nothing in the underlying legislation would: (1) adversely affect the commercial or sport fishing industries of California, Oregon, or Washington state or any population of west coast salmon; (2) create any legal precedent for any state other than California on water rights; or (3) undermine Native American tribal sovereignty, or reduce the quantity or quality of the water available by affected Indian tribes.
|
Dec. 9, 2014 |
Mr. Miller, George moved to recommit with instructions to the Committee on Natural Resources. (consideration: CR H8886-8888; text: CR H8886)
|
Dec. 9, 2014 |
Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule 19, further proceedings on H.R. 5781 were resumed.
|
Dec. 9, 2014 |
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H8886-8889)
|
Dec. 8, 2014 |
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - The Chair announced that, pursuant to clause 1(c), rule XIX, further proceedings on H.R. 5781 would be postponed.
|
Dec. 8, 2014 |
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H8840)
|
Dec. 8, 2014 |
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 770, the House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 5781.
|
Dec. 8, 2014 |
Resolution provides for consideration of the Senate amendment to H.R. 3979; consideration of the bill H.R. 5759; and consideration of the bill H.R. 5781.
|
Dec. 8, 2014 |
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 770. (consideration: CR H8826-8840)
|
Dec. 2, 2014 |
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
|
Dec. 2, 2014 |
Introduced in the House by David Valadao (R-Calif.) |