H.RES.163: Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 27) establishing the budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2016 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2017 through 2025.

About This Bill

  • Introduced March 23, 2015
  • Latest Major Action March 24, 2015

Bill Sponsor

Bill Summary

Sets forth the rule for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 27) establishing the budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2016 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2017 through 2025.

(Source: Library of Congress)

Bill Actions

Date Description
March 24, 2015
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
March 24, 2015

On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 237 - 180, 1 Present (Roll no. 133). (text: CR H1858)

March 24, 2015

On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 238 - 180 (Roll no. 132). (consideration: CR H868)

March 24, 2015
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 163.
March 24, 2015
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1858-1869)
March 23, 2015
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 17.
March 23, 2015
The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the concurrent resolution. The resolution waives all points of order against the amendments printed in the report. The resolution provides that if more than one such amendment is adopted, then only the one receiving the greater number of affirmative votes shall be considered as finally adopted. In the case of a tie for the greater number of affirmative votes, then only the last amendment to receive that number of affirmative votes shall be considered as finally adopted. The resolution permits the chair of the Budget Committee to offer amendments in the House pursuant to section 305(a)(5) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to achieve mathematical consistency. The resolution provides that the concurrent resolution shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question of its adoption.
March 23, 2015
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 114-49, by Mr. Woodall.
March 23, 2015

Introduced in the House by Rob Woodall (R-Ga.)

Close Comment Creative Commons Donate Email Facebook Mobile Phone Podcast Print Google News logo Google_NewsInitiative_Lockup_FullColor RSS Search Search Twitter WhatsApp Resolving differences Check Building Arrow right Info circle Oops OOPS Pencil File text Bars Search Close Cogs Filter Compare Revolving Door Info card Activity Member menu Globe Document External link Quote News Calendar No Vote
Current site Current page