Legislators
Bills
Statements
Lobbying
Travel
Searching...- Bills
- H.R.963
H.R.963: FAIR Act of 2022
About This Bill
- Introduced Feb. 11, 2021
- Latest Major Action March 21, 2022
- See the nine similar bills introduced in other congresses.
Bill Sponsor
Bill Cosponsors
203 (202 Democrats, 1 Republican)
Bill Versions
- Referred in Senate - March 21, 2022
- Engrossed in House - March 17, 2022
- Reported in House - March 11, 2022
- Introduced in House - Feb. 11, 2021
Bill Summary
Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal Act of 2022 or the FAIR Act of 2022 This bill prohibits a predispute arbitration agreement from being valid or enforceable if it requires arbitration of an employment, consumer, antitrust, or civil rights dispute.
(Source: Library of Congress)
Statement of Administration Policy
What Lawmakers Are Saying About This Bill
Bill Actions
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| March 21, 2022 |
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
|
| March 17, 2022 |
Mr. Bentz moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary.
|
| March 17, 2022 |
Considered as unfinished business.
|
| March 17, 2022 |
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 979.
|
| March 17, 2022 |
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
|
| March 17, 2022 |
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 222 - 209 (Roll no. 81).
|
| March 17, 2022 |
On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 208 - 222 (Roll no. 80).
|
| March 17, 2022 |
The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
|
| March 17, 2022 |
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was on agreeing to the Fitgerald amendment, which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
|
| March 17, 2022 |
Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, the House resumed proceedings on H.R. 963.
|
| March 17, 2022 |
Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, further proceedings on H.R. 963 were postponed.
|
| March 17, 2022 |
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Fitzgerald amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Fitzgerald demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
|
| March 17, 2022 |
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 979, the House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Fitzgerald amendment No. 1.
|
| March 17, 2022 |
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 963.
|
| March 17, 2022 |
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 963 and H.R. 2116. The rule provides for one hour of general debate on both H.R. 963 and H.R. 2116.
|
| March 17, 2022 |
Mr. Bentz moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H3812)
|
| March 17, 2022 |
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3811-3813)
|
| March 17, 2022 |
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 979. (consideration: CR H3788-3798)
|
| March 15, 2022 |
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 979 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 963 and H.R. 2116. The rule provides for one hour of general debate on both H.R. 963 and H.R. 2116.
|
| March 11, 2022 |
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 198.
|
| March 11, 2022 |
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 117-270.
|
| Nov. 3, 2021 |
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 23 - 14.
|
| Nov. 3, 2021 |
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
|
| Nov. 3, 2021 |
Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law Discharged.
|
| April 23, 2021 |
Referred to the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law.
|
| Feb. 11, 2021 |
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
|
| Feb. 11, 2021 |
Introduced in the House by Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) |