L. Perrigo Company

United States See location details

This drug manufacturing facility is registered with the FDA by L. Perrigo Company.

Facility Inspection History

The FDA is responsible for inspecting drug manufacturing facilities for violations of good manufacturing practices, such as a lack of documented drug quality testing or contaminated equipment. Below is a timeline of FDA inspections and outcomes for this facility assembled by ProPublica.

Note: ProPublica does not provide medical advice. Stopping your medication, doctors warn, can be dangerous. Please consult your doctor first if you have concerns. Read more
19 Known Inspections

The inspections we were able to locate using available FDA data do not include inspections in advance of the release of a new drug product.

10 Inspections Found Issues

When issues are observed, inspectors usually file an FDA 483 form with citations. In more serious cases, the FDA can issue warning letters or even ban the import of drugs from the facility.

  • Mar 19, 2025
    Mar 19, 2025
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    View Inspector Notes
    Inspector’s notes summarizing deficiencies observed during an inspection.
    5 citations
    Written sanitation procedures not followed
    Written procedures for sanitation are not followed.
    Written procedures not established/followed
    Written procedures are not established and followed for the cleaning and maintenance of equipment, including utensils, used in the manufacture, processing, packing or holding of a drug product.
    Computer control of master formula records
    Appropriate controls are not exercised over computers or related systems to assure that changes in master production and control records or other records are instituted only by authorized personnel.
    View Inspector Notes
    Inspector’s notes summarizing deficiencies observed during an inspection.
  • Oct 6, 2023
    Oct 6, 2023
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Jan 17, 2019
    Jan 17, 2019
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    View Inspector Notes
    Inspector’s notes summarizing deficiencies observed during an inspection.
    8 citations
    Procedures not in writing, fully followed
    The responsibilities and procedures applicable to the quality control unit are not in writing.
    Written procedures fail to include
    Written procedures for cleaning and maintenance fail to include maintenance and cleaning schedules, description in sufficient detail of methods, equipment and materials used, description in sufficient detail of the methods of disassembling and reassembling equipment as necessary to assure proper cleaning and maintenance, and instructions for removal or obliteration of previous batch identification.
    Procedures for non-sterile drug products
    Procedures designed to prevent objectionable microorganisms in drug products not required to be sterile are not established.
    View Inspector Notes
    Inspector’s notes summarizing deficiencies observed during an inspection.
  • Dec 11, 2014
    Dec 11, 2014
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Sep 4, 2014
    Sep 4, 2014
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • Nov 7, 2013
    Nov 7, 2013
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    2 citations
    Written procedures fail to include
    Written procedures for cleaning and maintenance fail to include maintenance and cleaning schedules, description in sufficient detail of methods, equipment and materials used, description in sufficient detail of the methods of disassembling and reassembling equipment as necessary to assure proper cleaning and maintenance, and instructions for removal or obliteration of previous batch identification.
    Packaging line inspection after use
    Inspection of the packaging and labeling facilities is not done after use to assure that materials not suitable for subsequent operations have been removed.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • May 17, 2013
    May 17, 2013
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Jul 10, 2012
    Jul 10, 2012
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • Jun 7, 2012
    Jun 7, 2012
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • May 8, 2012
    May 8, 2012
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Mar 21, 2011
    Mar 21, 2011
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    2 citations
    Scientifically sound laboratory controls
    Laboratory controls do not include the establishment of scientifically sound and appropriate test procedures designed to assure that in-process materials conform to appropriate standards of identity, strength, quality and purity.
    Extent of discrepancy, failure investigations
    Investigations of an unexplained discrepancy did not extend to other batches of the same drug product and other drug products that may have been associated with the specific failure or discrepancy.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • Mar 9, 2011
    Mar 9, 2011
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Jun 28, 2010
    Jun 28, 2010
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Mar 17, 2010
    Mar 17, 2010
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Feb 11, 2010
    Feb 11, 2010
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    3 citations
    Filling, assembling, packing controls
    Failure to perform filling and packaging in a manner that protects food from becoming contaminated.
    Buildings of Suitable Size, Construction, Location
    Buildings used in the manufacture, processing, packing, or holding of a drug product do not have the suitable construction to facilitate cleaning, maintenance, and proper operations.
    Theoretical yield statement including percentages
    Master production and control records lack a statement of theoretical yield including the maximum and minimum percentages of theoretical yield beyond which investigation is required.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • Jan 14, 2010
    Jan 14, 2010
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA ruled the facility was in an “unacceptable state of compliance.”

    Inspectors found serious issues at the facility, and the agency ultimately recommended official compliance action. In cases like this, the FDA typically pauses the facility’s pending drug approvals. There may be additional communications, including about issues being resolved, that are not reflected in our database because they have not been made public.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • Jan 27, 2009
    Jan 27, 2009
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    5 citations
    Q.C. instrument accuracy, maintenance
    Instruments used for measuring conditions that control or prevent the growth of undesirable microorganisms are not adequately maintained.
    Teardown equipment/thorough cleaning
    Failure to take apart equipment as necessary to ensure thorough cleaning.
    Manufacturing conditions
    Failure to manufacture foods under conditions and controls necessary to minimize the potential for growth of microorganisms.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • Jan 16, 2009
    Jan 16, 2009
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Nov 7, 2008
    Nov 7, 2008
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    10 citations
    Approve or reject components, products
    The quality control unit lacks the responsibility and authority to reject all drug products.
    Contract drug products--lack of responsibility
    The quality control unit lacks responsibility for approving or rejecting drug products manufactured under contract by another company.
    Procedures not in writing, fully followed
    The responsibilities and procedures applicable to the quality control unit are not in writing.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.

Frequently Asked Questions