Confab Laboratories Inc.
This drug manufacturing facility is registered with the FDA by Confab Laboratories Inc.. ProPublica was able to identify at least 2 generic drugs that have been manufactured at this facility.
Facility Inspection History
The FDA is responsible for inspecting drug manufacturing facilities for violations of good manufacturing practices, such as a lack of documented drug quality testing or contaminated equipment. Below is a timeline of FDA inspections and outcomes for this facility assembled by ProPublica.
The inspections we were able to locate using available FDA data do not include inspections in advance of the release of a new drug product.
When issues are observed, inspectors usually file an FDA 483 form with citations. In more serious cases, the FDA can issue warning letters or even ban the import of drugs from the facility.
- Feb 3, 2023Feb 3, 2023Inspection
The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.
This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors. - Dec 1, 2017Dec 1, 2017Inspection With Issues
The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.
In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.5 citations
Procedures not in writing, fully followedThe responsibilities and procedures applicable to the quality control unit are not in writing.Rejected Material AreaSeparate or defined areas to prevent contamination or mix-ups are deficient regarding operations related to the holding of rejected components, drug product containers, and labeling before disposition.Computer control of master formula recordsAppropriate controls are not exercised over computers or related systems to assure that changes in master production and control records or other records are instituted only by authorized personnel.ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection. - Oct 30, 2015Oct 30, 2015Inspection
The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.
This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors. - Oct 24, 2014Oct 24, 2014Inspection
The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.
This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors. - Jun 7, 2013Jun 7, 2013Inspection With Issues
The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.
In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.1 citation
Extent of discrepancy, failure investigationsInvestigations of an unexplained discrepancy did not extend to other batches of the same drug product and other drug products that may have been associated with the specific failure or discrepancy.ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection. - Sep 29, 2011Sep 29, 2011Inspection With Issues
The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.
In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.2 citations
SOPs not followed / documentedWritten production and process control procedures are not followed in the execution of production and process control functions.Test method modification records do not includeRecords maintained of any modification of an established method employed in testing do not include the reason for the modification.ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection. - Apr 8, 2009Apr 8, 2009Inspection With Issues
The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.
In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.

