Skip to content
ProPublica Donate
ProPublica Donate
New Search

Ohm Laboratories Inc.

United States See location details
Last FDA Action: Oct 31, 2024

This drug manufacturing facility is registered with the FDA by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.. ProPublica was able to identify at least 148 generic drugs that have been manufactured at this facility.

Facility Inspection History

The FDA is responsible for inspecting drug manufacturing facilities for violations of good manufacturing practices, such as a lack of documented drug quality testing or contaminated equipment. Below is a timeline of FDA inspections and outcomes for this facility assembled by ProPublica.

Note: ProPublica does not provide medical advice. Stopping your medication, doctors warn, can be dangerous. Please consult your doctor first if you have concerns.
22 Known Inspections

The inspections we were able to locate using available FDA data do not include inspections in advance of the release of a new drug product.

7 Inspections Found Issues

When issues are observed, inspectors usually file an FDA 483 form with citations. In more serious cases, the FDA can issue warning letters or even ban the import of drugs from the facility.

  • Oct 31, 2024
    Oct 31, 2024
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Jan 12, 2024
    Jan 12, 2024
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Nov 10, 2022
    Nov 10, 2022
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Aug 2, 2021
    Aug 2, 2021
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Feb 5, 2020
    Feb 5, 2020
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    View Inspector Notes
    Inspector’s notes summarizing deficiencies observed during an inspection.
    3 citations
    Procedures not in writing, fully followed
    The responsibilities and procedures applicable to the quality control unit are not in writing.
    Following/documenting laboratory controls
    Established laboratory control mechanisms are not followed and documented at the time of performance.
    Extent of discrepancy, failure investigations
    Investigations of an unexplained discrepancy did not extend to other batches of the same drug product and other drug products that may have been associated with the specific failure or discrepancy.
    View Inspector Notes
    Inspector’s notes summarizing deficiencies observed during an inspection.
  • Aug 17, 2018
    Aug 17, 2018
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Nov 8, 2017
    Nov 8, 2017
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Nov 8, 2017
    Nov 8, 2017
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Nov 22, 2016
    Nov 22, 2016
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Oct 5, 2016
    Oct 5, 2016
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Nov 3, 2015
    Nov 3, 2015
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Mar 18, 2014
    Mar 18, 2014
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • Mar 18, 2014
    Mar 18, 2014
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • Oct 23, 2013
    Oct 23, 2013
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Oct 23, 2013
    Oct 23, 2013
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Dec 18, 2012
    Dec 18, 2012
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    3 citations
    Representative Samples
    Representative samples are not taken of each shipment of each lot of components, drug product containers, and closures for testing or examination.
    SOPs not followed / documented
    Written production and process control procedures are not followed in the execution of production and process control functions.
    Investigations of discrepancies, failures
    There is a failure to thoroughly review any unexplained discrepancy whether or not the batch has been already distributed.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • Aug 13, 2012
    Aug 13, 2012
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Jul 19, 2012
    Jul 19, 2012
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Jul 14, 2010
    Jul 14, 2010
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • Jul 12, 2010
    Jul 12, 2010
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Feb 19, 2009
    Feb 19, 2009
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • Feb 19, 2009
    Feb 19, 2009
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.

Drugs Manufactured Here

Below is a list of generic prescription drugs that we’ve been able to connect to this facility. Brand name and over-the-counter drugs, as well as labels we were unable to trace, are not included here.

Amphetamine Sulfate

CompanySun Pharmaceutical Industries
Dosage
5mg
Mottled off white round tablet marked with 062
NDC: 57664-062-88

Amphetamine Sulfate

CompanySun Pharmaceutical Industries
Dosage
10mg
Mottled light blue round tablet marked with 075
NDC: 57664-075-88

Clindamycin Hcl

CompanyAdvanced Rx Of Tennessee
Dosage
Clindamycin Hydrochloride
300mg
Blue capsule marked with RX693
NDC: 80425-0103-1

Clindamycin Hydrochloride

CompanyPreferred Pharmaceuticals
Dosage
300mg
Turquoise blue cap, turquoise blue body capsule marked with RX693
NDC: 68788-8219-X

Clindamycin Hydrochloride

CompanyA-s Medication Solutions
Dosage
300mg
Turquoise blue cap, turquoise blue body capsule marked with RX693
NDC: 50090-0967-X

Clindamycin Hydrochloride

CompanyRemedyrepack
Dosage
150mg
Turquoise blue cap, light green body capsule marked with RX692
NDC: 70518-0424-X

Clindamycin Hydrochloride

CompanyRemedyrepack
Dosage
300mg
Turquoise blue cap, turquoise blue body capsule marked with RX693
NDC: 70518-0732-X

Clindamycin Hydrochloride

CompanyMajor Pharmaceuticals
Dosage
150mg
Turquoise blue cap, light green body capsule marked with RX692 RX692
NDC: 0904-5959-61

Clindamycin Hydrochloride

CompanyNorthwind Pharmaceuticals
Dosage
150mg
Turquoise blue cap, light green body capsule marked with RX692
NDC: 51655-964-52

Clindamycin Hydrochloride

CompanyAmerican Health Packaging
Dosage
300mg
Turquoise blue cap, turquoise blue body capsule marked with RX693 RX693
NDC: 68084-244-X

Clindamycin Hydrochloride

CompanyAmerican Health Packaging
Dosage
150mg
Turquoise blue cap, light green body capsule marked with RX692 RX692
NDC: 68084-243-X

Clindamycin Hydrochloride

CompanyA-s Medication Solutions
Dosage
150mg
Turquoise blue cap, light green body capsule marked with RX692
NDC: 50090-7007-0

Frequently Asked Questions

What Do the Inspection Outcomes Mean?
These are the possible FDA compliance outcomes we highlight:
  • Import alert. This is rare and means drugs from this facility were banned from coming into the U.S. Specifically we are including alerts relating to FDA manufacturing standards for drug products. The agency sometimes exempts certain drugs from import bans, ostensibly to prevent drug shortages.
  • Warning letter. This is a disciplinary tool the FDA uses to lay out significant violations of federal requirements. The company has an opportunity to respond and/or provide its plans to correct the issues. The agency might later issue a “close-out letter” to say it has confirmed that issues raised in a previous warning letter were fixed. But that doesn’t always happen.
  • Unacceptable state of compliance. This means inspectors found serious issues at the facility and the agency ultimately recommended official compliance action. In cases like this, the FDA typically pauses the facility’s pending drug approvals. The agency classifies this as “official action indicated.”
  • Some issues found, but no further FDA action. This is very common. It means the FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily. In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time. The agency classifies this as “voluntary action indicated.”
  • Inspector documented issues. Inspectors can file notes summarizing deficiencies observed during an inspection using a 483 form. In some cases, we’re unable to connect a Form 483 to an FDA inspection designation, but we show that an inspector filed this form, perhaps as part of an inspection that was not included in the public inspection dashboard.
  • Acceptable state. This is common and the best possible outcome for an inspection. This means the FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors. That doesn’t always mean no issues turned up. Sometimes, inspectors address concerns with management on site that they believe do not need to be documented on a 483. The agency classifies this as “no action indicated.”
There may be additional communications, including about issues being resolved, that are not reflected in our database because they have not been made public.

What if I Find Something Concerning?
ProPublica does not provide medical advice. Keep in mind that if you turn up a troubling inspection report, it doesn’t necessarily mean that your drug is compromised. Doctors and pharmacists advise that you not stop taking your medications. Instead, you should talk to your health care provider about any concerns.
There are often different manufacturers of the same generic drug, and which manufacturer you get can depend on the pharmacy where you shop and what it has in stock. Changing the pharmacy where you fill your prescription might mean you can get a generic made by a different manufacturer.
The FDA maintains a database known as the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System that tracks reports about potential drug-quality problems and sudden and unexpected health conditions among consumers. Both health care professionals and consumers can report problems.
Although we cannot offer medical advice, our reporting team wants to hear from you. Please fill out this form to let us know what you find. We may follow up with future reporting.

How Did ProPublica Connect This Information?
We have written an in-depth methodology, but in short, we connected several FDA databases:
  • The Structured Product Labeling database.
  • The National Drug Code Directory.
  • The Electronic Drug Registration and Listing System.
  • Data from the agency’s inspection dashboard.
  • A spreadsheet of facility addresses we sued the FDA for, which connected them to drug application numbers.
  • Form 483 documents we received from a Freedom of Information Act Request.
ProPublica described the app and the methodology used to build it to the FDA, which did not comment. The agency previously told ProPublica that it doesn’t reveal where drugs are made on inspection reports to protect what it deemed confidential commercial information.

How Do I Report Incorrect Information?
If you work for a manufacturer or otherwise see that information we are displaying may be incorrect, please email [email protected].