ProPublica
Donate
New Search

Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited

India See location details
Last FDA Action: Oct 20, 2023
Recent Compliance Action Read more

This drug manufacturing facility is registered with the FDA by Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited. ProPublica was able to identify at least 357 generic drugs that have been manufactured at this facility.

Facility Inspection History

The FDA is responsible for inspecting drug manufacturing facilities for violations of good manufacturing practices, such as a lack of documented drug quality testing or contaminated equipment. Below is a timeline of FDA inspections and outcomes for this facility assembled by ProPublica.

Note: ProPublica does not provide medical advice. Stopping your medication, doctors warn, can be dangerous. Please consult your doctor first if you have concerns. Read more
6 Known Inspections

The inspections we were able to locate using available FDA data do not include inspections in advance of the release of a new drug product.

5 Inspections Found Issues

When issues are observed, inspectors usually file an FDA 483 form with citations. In more serious cases, the FDA can issue warning letters or even ban the import of drugs from the facility.

  • Oct 20, 2023
    Oct 20, 2023
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    View Inspector Notes
    Inspector’s notes summarizing deficiencies observed during an inspection.
    8 citations
    Written procedures not established/followed
    Written procedures are not established and followed for the cleaning and maintenance of equipment, including utensils, used in the manufacture, processing, packing or holding of a drug product.
    Computer control of master formula records
    Appropriate controls are not exercised over computers or related systems to assure that changes in master production and control records or other records are instituted only by authorized personnel.
    In-process materials specifications
    In-process specifications are not determined by the application of suitable statistical procedures where appropriate.
    View Inspector Notes
    Inspector’s notes summarizing deficiencies observed during an inspection.
  • Nov 1, 2021
    Nov 1, 2021
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA ruled the facility was in an “unacceptable state of compliance.”

    Inspectors found serious issues at the facility, and the agency ultimately recommended official compliance action. In cases like this, the FDA typically pauses the facility’s pending drug approvals. There may be additional communications, including about issues being resolved, that are not reflected in our database because they have not been made public.
    View Inspector Notes
    Inspector’s notes summarizing deficiencies observed during an inspection.
    View Inspector Notes
    Inspector’s notes summarizing deficiencies observed during an inspection.
  • Nov 24, 2017
    Nov 24, 2017
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA ruled the facility was in an “unacceptable state of compliance.”

    Inspectors found serious issues at the facility, and the agency ultimately recommended official compliance action. In cases like this, the FDA typically pauses the facility’s pending drug approvals. There may be additional communications, including about issues being resolved, that are not reflected in our database because they have not been made public.
    9 citations
    Training--operations, GMPs, written procedures
    Employees are not given training in the particular operations they perform as part of their function.
    Representative Samples
    Representative samples are not taken of each shipment of each lot of components, drug product containers, and closures for testing or examination.
    Absence of Written Procedures
    There are no written procedures for production and process controls designed to assure that the drug products have the identity, strength, quality, and purity they purport or are represented to possess.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • May 15, 2015
    May 15, 2015
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • Feb 22, 2013
    Feb 22, 2013
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Dec 10, 2010
    Dec 10, 2010
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.

Drugs Manufactured Here

Below is a list of generic prescription drugs that we’ve been able to connect to this facility. Brand name and over-the-counter drugs, as well as labels we were unable to trace, are not included here.

Abacavir And Lamivudine

CompanyMacleods Pharmaceuticals
Dosage
Abacavir Sulfate
600mg
Lamivudine
300mg
Orange capsule-shaped tablet, film coated marked with I60
NDC: 33342-440-X

Amlodipine And Olmesartan Medoxomil

CompanyMacleods Pharmaceuticals
Dosage
Amlodipine Besylate
5mg
Olmesartan Medoxomil
20mg
White round tablet, film coated marked with L75
NDC: 33342-190-X

Amlodipine And Olmesartan Medoxomil

CompanyMacleods Pharmaceuticals
Dosage
Amlodipine Besylate
10mg
Olmesartan Medoxomil
40mg
Brownish red round tablet, film coated marked with L78
NDC: 33342-193-X

Amlodipine And Olmesartan Medoxomil

CompanyMacleods Pharmaceuticals
Dosage
Amlodipine Besylate
5mg
Olmesartan Medoxomil
40mg
Light yellow round tablet, film coated marked with L77
NDC: 33342-191-X

Amlodipine And Olmesartan Medoxomil

CompanyMacleods Pharmaceuticals
Dosage
Amlodipine Besylate
10mg
Olmesartan Medoxomil
20mg
Grayish orange round tablet, film coated marked with L76
NDC: 33342-192-X

Amlodipine And Valsartan

CompanyMacleods Pharmaceuticals
Dosage
Amlodipine Besylate
5mg
Valsartan
160mg
Yellow oval tablet marked with C94
NDC: 33342-279-X

Amlodipine And Valsartan

CompanyMacleods Pharmaceuticals
Dosage
Amlodipine Besylate
10mg
Valsartan
160mg
Yellow oval tablet marked with T96
NDC: 33342-280-X

Amlodipine And Valsartan

CompanyMacleods Pharmaceuticals
Dosage
Amlodipine Besylate
5mg
Valsartan
320mg
Yellow oval tablet marked with C95
NDC: 33342-281-X

Amlodipine And Valsartan

CompanyMacleods Pharmaceuticals
Dosage
Amlodipine Besylate
10mg
Valsartan
320mg
Yellow oval tablet marked with T97
NDC: 33342-282-X

Amlodipine,valsartan And Hydrochlorothiazide

CompanyMacleods Pharmaceuticals
Dosage
Amlodipine Besylate
5mg
Valsartan
160mg
White oval tablet, film coated marked with T23
NDC: 33342-283-X

Amlodipine,valsartan And Hydrochlorothiazide

CompanyMacleods Pharmaceuticals
Dosage
Amlodipine Besylate
10mg
Valsartan
160mg
Pale yellow oval tablet, film coated marked with C96
NDC: 33342-284-X

Amlodipine,valsartan And Hydrochlorothiazide

CompanyMacleods Pharmaceuticals
Dosage
Amlodipine Besylate
10mg
Valsartan
320mg
Brown-yellow oval tablet, film coated marked with T98
NDC: 33342-287-X

Frequently Asked Questions

What Do the Inspection Outcomes Mean?
These are the possible FDA compliance outcomes we highlight:
  • Import alert. This is rare and means drugs from this facility were banned from coming into the U.S. Specifically we are including alerts relating to FDA manufacturing standards for drug products. The agency sometimes exempts certain drugs from import bans, ostensibly to prevent drug shortages.
  • Warning letter. This is a disciplinary tool the FDA uses to lay out significant violations of federal requirements. The company has an opportunity to respond and/or provide its plans to correct the issues. The agency might later issue a “close-out letter” to say it has confirmed that issues raised in a previous warning letter were fixed. But that doesn’t always happen.
  • Unacceptable state of compliance. This means inspectors found serious issues at the facility and the agency ultimately recommended official compliance action. In cases like this, the FDA typically pauses the facility’s pending drug approvals. The agency classifies this as “official action indicated.”
  • Some issues found, but no further FDA action. This is very common. It means the FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily. In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time. The agency classifies this as “voluntary action indicated.”
  • Inspector documented issues. Inspectors can file notes summarizing deficiencies observed during an inspection using a 483 form. In some cases, we’re unable to connect a Form 483 to an FDA inspection designation, but we show that an inspector filed this form, perhaps as part of an inspection that was not included in the public inspection dashboard.
  • Acceptable state. This is common and the best possible outcome for an inspection. This means the FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors. That doesn’t always mean no issues turned up. Sometimes, inspectors address concerns with management on site that they believe do not need to be documented on a 483. The agency classifies this as “no action indicated.”
There may be additional communications, including about issues being resolved, that are not reflected in our database because they have not been made public.

How Did ProPublica Connect This Information?
We have written an in-depth methodology, but in short, we connected several FDA databases:
  • The Structured Product Labeling database.
  • The National Drug Code Directory.
  • The Electronic Drug Registration and Listing System.
  • Data from the agency’s inspection dashboard.
  • A spreadsheet of facility addresses we sued the FDA for, which connected them to drug application numbers.
  • Form 483 documents we received from a Freedom of Information Act Request.
ProPublica described the app and the methodology used to build it to the FDA, which did not comment. The agency previously told ProPublica that it doesn’t reveal where drugs are made on inspection reports to protect what it deemed confidential commercial information.

How Do I Report Incorrect Information?
If you work for a manufacturer or otherwise see that information we are displaying may be incorrect, please email [email protected].