Skip to content
ProPublica Donate
ProPublica Donate
New Search

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.

United States See location details
Last FDA Action: Apr 18, 2025

This drug manufacturing facility is registered with the FDA by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.. ProPublica was able to identify at least 5 generic drugs that have been manufactured at this facility.

Facility Inspection History

The FDA is responsible for inspecting drug manufacturing facilities for violations of good manufacturing practices, such as a lack of documented drug quality testing or contaminated equipment. Below is a timeline of FDA inspections and outcomes for this facility assembled by ProPublica.

Note: ProPublica does not provide medical advice. Stopping your medication, doctors warn, can be dangerous. Please consult your doctor first if you have concerns.
14 Known Inspections

The inspections we were able to locate using available FDA data do not include inspections in advance of the release of a new drug product.

10 Inspections Found Issues

When issues are observed, inspectors usually file an FDA 483 form with citations. In more serious cases, the FDA can issue warning letters or even ban the import of drugs from the facility.

  • Apr 18, 2025
    Apr 18, 2025
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    View Inspector Notes
    Inspector’s notes summarizing deficiencies observed during an inspection.
    9 citations
    Procedures not in writing, fully followed
    The responsibilities and procedures applicable to the quality control unit are not in writing.
    Defined areas of adequate size for operations
    The separate or defined areas and control systems necessary to prevent contamination or mix-ups are deficient.
    Sanitation--buildings not clean, free of infestation
    Buildings used in the manufacture, processing, packing or holding of drug products are not free of infestation by rodents, birds insects, and other vermin.
    View Inspector Notes
    Inspector’s notes summarizing deficiencies observed during an inspection.
  • Dec 23, 2019
    Dec 23, 2019
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    View Inspector Notes
    Inspector’s notes summarizing deficiencies observed during an inspection.
    View Inspector Notes
    Inspector’s notes summarizing deficiencies observed during an inspection.
  • Mar 19, 2018
    Mar 19, 2018
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Dec 20, 2017
    Dec 20, 2017
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Nov 13, 2017
    Nov 13, 2017
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • Jun 29, 2016
    Jun 29, 2016
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
  • Jun 29, 2016
    Jun 29, 2016
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    4 citations
    Procedures not in writing, fully followed
    The responsibilities and procedures applicable to the quality control unit are not in writing.
    Components withheld from use pending release
    Each lot of components, drug product containers, and closures is not withheld from use until the lot has been sampled, tested, examined, and released by the quality control unit.
    Investigations of discrepancies, failures
    There is a failure to thoroughly review any unexplained discrepancy whether or not the batch has been already distributed.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • Jan 13, 2015
    Jan 13, 2015
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • Sep 17, 2014
    Sep 17, 2014
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    6 citations
    Training , Education , Experience overall
    Employees engaged in the manufacture of a drug product lack the training required to perform their assigned functions.
    Calibration/Inspection/Checking not done
    Routine calibration of mechanical equipment is not performed according to a written program designed to assure proper performance.
    Procedures for sterile drug products
    Procedures designed to prevent microbiological contamination of drug products purporting to be sterile are not written.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • Nov 30, 2012
    Nov 30, 2012
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • Apr 25, 2012
    Apr 25, 2012
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    6 citations
    Control procedures to monitor and validate performance
    Control procedures are not established which monitor the output and validate the performance of those manufacturing processes that may be responsible for causing variability in the characteristics of in-process material and the drug product.
    Establishment of time limitations
    Time limits are not established when appropriate for the completion of each production phase to assure the quality of the drug product.
    Procedures for sterile drug products
    Procedures designed to prevent microbiological contamination of drug products purporting to be sterile are not written.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • Mar 13, 2012
    Mar 13, 2012
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • Jul 22, 2010
    Jul 22, 2010
    Inspection With Issues

    The FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily.

    In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time.
    9 citations
    Defined areas of adequate size for operations
    The separate or defined areas and control systems necessary to prevent contamination or mix-ups are deficient.
    Calibration/Inspection/Checking not done
    Routine calibration of mechanical equipment is not performed according to a written program designed to assure proper performance.
    Examination on receipt, before acceptance
    Each container or grouping of containers of drug product containers is not examined visually upon receipt and before acceptance for container damage.
    ProPublica was unable to locate a 483 form detailing issues found in this inspection.
  • Apr 27, 2009
    Apr 27, 2009
    Inspection

    The FDA determined this facility was in an acceptable state.

    This is the best possible outcome for an inspection. The FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors.
    1 citation
    Procedures for sterile drug products
    Procedures designed to prevent microbiological contamination of drug products purporting to be sterile are not written.

Drugs Manufactured Here

Below is a list of generic prescription drugs that we’ve been able to connect to this facility. Brand name and over-the-counter drugs, as well as labels we were unable to trace, are not included here.

Epoprostenol

CompanySun Pharmaceutical Industries
Dosage
Epoprostenol Sodium
0.5mg/10mL
Injection, powder, lyophilized, for solution in a vial (10mL)
NDC: 62756-059-40

Epoprostenol

CompanySun Pharmaceutical Industries
Dosage
Epoprostenol Sodium
1.5mg/10mL
Injection, powder, lyophilized, for solution in a vial (10mL)
NDC: 62756-060-40

Kit For The Preparation Of Technetium Tc 99m Mebrofenin

CompanySun Pharmaceutical Industries
Dosage
Mebrofenin
45mg/10mL
Injection, powder, lyophilized, for solution in a vial, multi-dose (10mL)
NDC: 45567-0455-X

Kit For The Preparation Of Technetium Tc99m Mertiatide

CompanySun Pharmaceutical Industries
Dosage
Betiatide
1mg
Injection, powder, lyophilized, for solution in a carton (5)
NDC: 45567-0655-1

Kit For The Preparation Of Technetium Tc99m Sestamibi

CompanySun Pharmaceutical Industries
Dosage
Technetium Tc-99m Sestamibi
1mg/10mL
Injection in a vial (10mL)
NDC: 45567-0555-X

Frequently Asked Questions

What Do the Inspection Outcomes Mean?
These are the possible FDA compliance outcomes we highlight:
  • Import alert. This is rare and means drugs from this facility were banned from coming into the U.S. Specifically we are including alerts relating to FDA manufacturing standards for drug products. The agency sometimes exempts certain drugs from import bans, ostensibly to prevent drug shortages.
  • Warning letter. This is a disciplinary tool the FDA uses to lay out significant violations of federal requirements. The company has an opportunity to respond and/or provide its plans to correct the issues. The agency might later issue a “close-out letter” to say it has confirmed that issues raised in a previous warning letter were fixed. But that doesn’t always happen.
  • Unacceptable state of compliance. This means inspectors found serious issues at the facility and the agency ultimately recommended official compliance action. In cases like this, the FDA typically pauses the facility’s pending drug approvals. The agency classifies this as “official action indicated.”
  • Some issues found, but no further FDA action. This is very common. It means the FDA found issues but determined the facility can correct them voluntarily. In some cases, inspectors may have recommended a different (potentially more serious) classification, but the agency declined to pursue further enforcement at the time. The agency classifies this as “voluntary action indicated.”
  • Inspector documented issues. Inspectors can file notes summarizing deficiencies observed during an inspection using a 483 form. In some cases, we’re unable to connect a Form 483 to an FDA inspection designation, but we show that an inspector filed this form, perhaps as part of an inspection that was not included in the public inspection dashboard.
  • Acceptable state. This is common and the best possible outcome for an inspection. This means the FDA took no compliance action and ProPublica found no issues documented by inspectors. That doesn’t always mean no issues turned up. Sometimes, inspectors address concerns with management on site that they believe do not need to be documented on a 483. The agency classifies this as “no action indicated.”
There may be additional communications, including about issues being resolved, that are not reflected in our database because they have not been made public.

What if I Find Something Concerning?
ProPublica does not provide medical advice. Keep in mind that if you turn up a troubling inspection report, it doesn’t necessarily mean that your drug is compromised. Doctors and pharmacists advise that you not stop taking your medications. Instead, you should talk to your health care provider about any concerns.
There are often different manufacturers of the same generic drug, and which manufacturer you get can depend on the pharmacy where you shop and what it has in stock. Changing the pharmacy where you fill your prescription might mean you can get a generic made by a different manufacturer.
The FDA maintains a database known as the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System that tracks reports about potential drug-quality problems and sudden and unexpected health conditions among consumers. Both health care professionals and consumers can report problems.
Although we cannot offer medical advice, our reporting team wants to hear from you. Please fill out this form to let us know what you find. We may follow up with future reporting.

How Did ProPublica Connect This Information?
We have written an in-depth methodology, but in short, we connected several FDA databases:
  • The Structured Product Labeling database.
  • The National Drug Code Directory.
  • The Electronic Drug Registration and Listing System.
  • Data from the agency’s inspection dashboard.
  • A spreadsheet of facility addresses we sued the FDA for, which connected them to drug application numbers.
  • Form 483 documents we received from a Freedom of Information Act Request.
ProPublica described the app and the methodology used to build it to the FDA, which did not comment. The agency previously told ProPublica that it doesn’t reveal where drugs are made on inspection reports to protect what it deemed confidential commercial information.

How Do I Report Incorrect Information?
If you work for a manufacturer or otherwise see that information we are displaying may be incorrect, please email [email protected].