California • San Joaquin County
Top 10 Largest Contracts
| REHABILITATION OF 24 STREETS IN THE CITY O... | CA / San Joaquin |
$6,096,740
|
| Total # Projects: | 13 |
| Total # Contracts: | 1 |
| Total $ Projects: | $33,951,605 |
| Total $ Contracts: | $6,096,740 |
Other Counties
| Project $ | |
|---|---|
| Alameda | $42,471,494 |
| Alpine | $0 |
| Amador | $2,053,487 |
| Butte | $25,683,995 |
| Calaveras | $0 |
| Colusa | $7,360,950 |
| Contra Costa | $22,417,000 |
| Del Norte | $3,709,877 |
| El Dorado | $47,012,900 |
| Fresno | $39,718,045 |
| Glenn | $707,749 |
| Humboldt | $2,687,850 |
| Imperial | $7,078,053 |
| Inyo | $13,083,974 |
| Kern | $39,065,688 |
| Kings | $5,151,487 |
| Lake | $2,425,960 |
| Lassen | $2,214,740 |
| Los Angeles | $600,656,384 |
| Madera | $14,780,715 |
| Marin | $7,830,410 |
| Mariposa | $8,881,394 |
| Mendocino | $16,065,384 |
| Merced | $45,828,058 |
| Modoc | $1,720,400 |
| Mono | $3,293,458 |
| Monterey | $16,899,380 |
| Napa | $4,110,000 |
| Nevada | $6,374,117 |
| Orange | $61,413,175 |
| Placer | $9,583,295 |
| Plumas | $2,297,840 |
| Riverside | $70,532,762 |
| Sacramento | $36,417,460 |
| San Benito | $850,000 |
| San Bernardino | $136,368,910 |
| San Diego | $204,127,541 |
| San Francisco | $14,768,000 |
| San Luis Obispo | $10,046,750 |
| San Mateo | $23,016,720 |
| Santa Barbara | $12,095,217 |
| Santa Clara | $51,260,682 |
| Santa Cruz | $5,668,875 |
| Shasta | $4,329,017 |
| Sierra | $994,600 |
| Siskiyou | $2,747,499 |
| Solano | $32,862,134 |
| Sonoma | $16,719,432 |
| Stanislaus | $3,274,155 |
| Sutter | $16,277,032 |
| Tehama | $35,429,790 |
| Trinity | $556,248 |
| Tulare | $6,400,000 |
| Tuolumne | $3,420,809 |
| Ventura | $35,862,686 |
| Yolo | $3,939,396 |
| Yuba | $5,489,107 |
| Show/hide all |
Collaborate
These news organizations have followed up and written stories using this database:
- PBS NewsHour/Patchwork Nation analyzed how transportation stimulus funds were distributed across communities.
Add yourself to this list: News organizations are welcome to use data here in their own stories. Please credit ProPublica for providing the data. If you have a good story to share or collaborate on, contact Senior Editor Tom Detzel
Questions? Tips?
About This Data
Note: To build this database, ProPublica obtained two sets of records from the U.S. Department of Transportation. We cleaned it to remove duplicates and other discrepancies, but it may have mistakes we didn't catch. If you find one, please let us know and include any information that may help us verify the correction. Also, the federal data is based on the states’ monthly reporting and may not be up-to-date.
First, we received an updated copy of the national database of stimulus road and bridge projects as of Sept. 25. Separately, we obtained data that states filed to the federal government as part of the stimulus legislation's reporting requirements. These data list which contractors had been awarded particular projects. We were able to trace more than 90 percent of the funds to individual counties. In a few other cases, projects are statewide and cannot be narrowed to county or serve multiple counties. We’ve indicated those cases in the data.
Wherever possible, we matched DOT projects to state recovery filings. They did not match in every instance. The DOT projects, which total $19 billion, include hundreds of projects not yet associated with a contractor. The contractors' data totals about $13 billion in obligated funds. In a few cases, state contractors did not match a DOT project. Some projects also have multiple contractors. When there is no matching contractor information for a project, searches and lists will return a blank.
We're trying to make this information as accurate as possible, so if you see something that needs to be corrected, please let us know.
Read more...
Here are our tips for running background checks on stimulus contractors.
All projects for San Joaquin. Not all projects have been awarded contracts.
| Project Name | Contractor | County | Improvement Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| REHABILITATION OF 24 STREETS IN THE CITY OF STOCKTON (Federal ID: 5008087) | KNIFE RIVER DBA DSS CONSTRUCTION | San Joaquin | Pavement Improvement | $6,096,740 |
| ENHANCEMENT OF EXISTING ROADWAY (Federal ID: 5154036) | No Contractor | San Joaquin | Pavement Improvement | $2,295,960 |
| RECONSTRUCT ROADWAY BETWEEN CARLTON AVENUE AND 11TH STREET (Federal ID: 5192028) | No Contractor | San Joaquin | Pavement Improvement | $1,614,306 |
| REHABILITATION OF 9 STREETS IN THE CITY OF MANTECA (Federal ID: 5242021) | No Contractor | San Joaquin | Pavement Improvement | $1,356,058 |
| EHANCEMENT OF EXISTING ROUNDABOUT (Federal ID: 5286012) | No Contractor | San Joaquin | Pavement Improvement | $202,131 |
| REHABILITATION OF 3 STREETS IN THE CITY OF RIPON (Federal ID: 5286013) | No Contractor | San Joaquin | Pavement Improvement | $100,000 |
| WEST YOSEMITE REHAB ESCALON AVE-STANISLAUS ST , REHABLITATION PROJECT (Federal ID: 5337009) | No Contractor | San Joaquin | Pavement Improvement | $149,714 |
| REHABILITATE ROADWAY BETWEEN J STREET AND THOMSEN ROAD (Federal ID: 5456010) | No Contractor | San Joaquin | Pavement Improvement | $347,348 |
| RESURFACE ROADWAY BETWEEN JACK TONE ROAD AND STATE ROUTE 120 (Federal ID: 5929197) | No Contractor | San Joaquin | Pavement Improvement | $1,077,800 |
| RESURFACE ROADWAY BETWEEN FRENCH CAMP ROAD AND STATE ROUTE 120 (Federal ID: 5929198) | No Contractor | San Joaquin | Pavement Improvement | $674,000 |
| RESURFACE ROADWAY BETWEEN PLYMOUTH ROAD AND ALEXANDRIA PLACE (Federal ID: 5929199) | No Contractor | San Joaquin | Pavement Improvement | $259,100 |
| RUBBERIZED CHIP SEAL OF 10 ROADWAYS IN SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY (Federal ID: 5929200) | No Contractor | San Joaquin | Pavement Improvement | $4,987,686 |
| WEST OF STOCKTON, FROM EAST OF MIDDLE RIVER TO TRAPPER ROAD. REALIGN CURVE. (Federal ID: P004133) | No Contractor | San Joaquin | Safety/Traffic Management | $14,746,111 |