Mississippi • Lawrence County

Top 10 Largest Contracts

See all contracts for Lawrence

Get Adobe Flash player

Total # Projects: 0
Total # Contracts: 0
Total $ Projects: $0
Total $ Contracts: $0

Other Counties

Project $
Adams $6,675,700
Alcorn $6,393,100
Amite $0
Attala $2,525,700
Benton $0
Bolivar $3,026,300
Calhoun $0
Carroll $166,072
Chickasaw $2,571,300
Choctaw $0
Claiborne $0
Clarke $0
Clay $0
Coahoma $263,800
Copiah $5,484,277
Covington $4,206,800
DeSoto $7,957,600
Forrest $8,636,900
Franklin $4,383,300
George $0
Greene $0
Grenada $0
Hancock $0
Harrison $1,759,832
Hinds $9,818,200
Holmes $1,124,205
Humphreys $0
Issaquena $0
Itawamba $5,464,500
Jackson $12,708,603
Jasper $0
Jefferson $0
Jefferson Davis $1,749,000
Jones $1,331,400
Kemper $0
Lafayette $3,960,000
Lamar $8,788,662
Lauderdale $29,179,299
Leake $0
Lee $4,455,588
Leflore $4,247,400
Lincoln $2,022,099
Lowndes $6,208,100
Madison $0
Marion $0
Marshall $1,879,745
Monroe $3,656,300
Montgomery $0
Neshoba $0
Newton $0
Noxubee $14,141,082
Oktibbeha $1,608,700
Panola $4,270,400
Pearl River $12,730,600
Perry $5,728,000
Pike $2,653,800
Pontotoc $0
Prentiss $0
Quitman $0
Rankin $8,833,500
Scott $2,342,400
Sharkey $102,200
Simpson $6,694,800
Smith $0
Stone $0
Sunflower $0
Tallahatchie $47,000
Tate $8,135,644
Tippah $0
Tishomingo $1,548,700
Tunica $0
Union $0
Walthall $4,983,600
Warren $0
Washington $2,500,800
Wayne $0
Webster $0
Wilkinson $0
Winston $810,671
Yalobusha $0
Yazoo $2,473,900
Show/hide all

Back to Homepage / Related Story


These news organizations have followed up and written stories using this database:

Add yourself to this list: News organizations are welcome to use data here in their own stories. Please credit ProPublica for providing the data. If you have a good story to share or collaborate on, contact Senior Editor Tom Detzel

Questions? Tips?

E-mail us.

About This Data

Note: To build this database, ProPublica obtained two sets of records from the U.S. Department of Transportation. We cleaned it to remove duplicates and other discrepancies, but it may have mistakes we didn't catch. If you find one, please let us know and include any information that may help us verify the correction. Also, the federal data is based on the states’ monthly reporting and may not be up-to-date.

First, we received an updated copy of the national database of stimulus road and bridge projects as of Sept. 25. Separately, we obtained data that states filed to the federal government as part of the stimulus legislation's reporting requirements. These data list which contractors had been awarded particular projects. We were able to trace more than 90 percent of the funds to individual counties. In a few other cases, projects are statewide and cannot be narrowed to county or serve multiple counties. We’ve indicated those cases in the data.

Wherever possible, we matched DOT projects to state recovery filings. They did not match in every instance. The DOT projects, which total $19 billion, include hundreds of projects not yet associated with a contractor. The contractors' data totals about $13 billion in obligated funds. In a few cases, state contractors did not match a DOT project. Some projects also have multiple contractors. When there is no matching contractor information for a project, searches and lists will return a blank.

We're trying to make this information as accurate as possible, so if you see something that needs to be corrected, please let us know.


Here are our tips for running background checks on stimulus contractors.

All projects for Lawrence. Not all projects have been awarded contracts.

Project Name Contractor County Improvement Type Amount