North Carolina • Rockingham County
Top 10 Largest Contracts
| US 29 FROM THE GUILFORD COUNTY LINE TO TRO... | NC / Rockingham |
$1,489,271
|
| Total # Projects: | 3 |
| Total # Contracts: | 1 |
| Total $ Projects: | $2,978,661 |
| Total $ Contracts: | $1,489,271 |
Other Counties
| Project $ | |
|---|---|
| Alamance | $19,872,081 |
| Alexander | $2,700,831 |
| Alleghany | $1,250,000 |
| Anson | $8,011,647 |
| Ashe | $2,311,563 |
| Avery | $1,030,620 |
| Beaufort | $0 |
| Bertie | $2,414,984 |
| Bladen | $975,000 |
| Brunswick | $7,243,601 |
| Buncombe | $17,685,375 |
| Burke | $10,195,245 |
| Cabarrus | $6,763,857 |
| Caldwell | $478,748 |
| Camden | $7,057,343 |
| Carteret | $500,000 |
| Caswell | $2,200,000 |
| Catawba | $0 |
| Chatham | $768,255 |
| Cherokee | $490,727 |
| Chowan | $1,791,215 |
| Clay | $0 |
| Cleveland | $1,516,551 |
| Columbus | $0 |
| Craven | $4,100,000 |
| Cumberland | $54,589,053 |
| Currituck | $650,000 |
| Dare | $4,503,850 |
| Davidson | $4,012,757 |
| Davie | $3,384,782 |
| Duplin | $0 |
| Durham | $8,808,322 |
| Edgecombe | $78,200 |
| Forsyth | $7,431,000 |
| Franklin | $2,314,646 |
| Gaston | $6,850,154 |
| Gates | $0 |
| Graham | $0 |
| Granville | $0 |
| Greene | $2,200,000 |
| Guilford | $21,660,762 |
| Halifax | $0 |
| Harnett | $450,000 |
| Haywood | $1,344,262 |
| Henderson | $4,673,198 |
| Hertford | $6,461,972 |
| Hoke | $0 |
| Hyde | $4,610,348 |
| Iredell | $33,310,466 |
| Jackson | $0 |
| Johnston | $18,891,975 |
| Jones | $0 |
| Lee | $4,563,928 |
| Lenoir | $42,926,208 |
| Lincoln | $0 |
| McDowell | $0 |
| Macon | $0 |
| Madison | $0 |
| Martin | $11,311,611 |
| Mecklenburg | $28,209,711 |
| Mitchell | $0 |
| Montgomery | $4,883,604 |
| Moore | $4,621,328 |
| Nash | $5,609,864 |
| New Hanover | $2,000,000 |
| Northampton | $10,282,172 |
| Onslow | $0 |
| Orange | $9,914,075 |
| Pamlico | $0 |
| Pasquotank | $0 |
| Pender | $0 |
| Perquimans | $2,728,375 |
| Person | $0 |
| Pitt | $860,500 |
| Polk | $10,000 |
| Randolph | $135,000 |
| Richmond | $26,500 |
| Robeson | $125,220 |
| Rowan | $4,465,640 |
| Rutherford | $0 |
| Sampson | $0 |
| Scotland | $2,757,443 |
| Stanly | $7,270,672 |
| Stokes | $3,226,120 |
| Surry | $9,723,852 |
| Swain | $6,483,915 |
| Transylvania | $4,810,274 |
| Tyrrell | $417,500 |
| Union | $11,299,119 |
| Vance | $0 |
| Wake | $28,168,890 |
| Warren | $0 |
| Washington | $440,000 |
| Watauga | $16,637,727 |
| Wayne | $4,586,058 |
| Wilkes | $1,602,356 |
| Wilson | $2,709,500 |
| Yadkin | $1,500,000 |
| Yancey | $0 |
| Show/hide all |
Collaborate
These news organizations have followed up and written stories using this database:
- PBS NewsHour/Patchwork Nation analyzed how transportation stimulus funds were distributed across communities.
Add yourself to this list: News organizations are welcome to use data here in their own stories. Please credit ProPublica for providing the data. If you have a good story to share or collaborate on, contact Senior Editor Tom Detzel
Questions? Tips?
About This Data
Note: To build this database, ProPublica obtained two sets of records from the U.S. Department of Transportation. We cleaned it to remove duplicates and other discrepancies, but it may have mistakes we didn't catch. If you find one, please let us know and include any information that may help us verify the correction. Also, the federal data is based on the states’ monthly reporting and may not be up-to-date.
First, we received an updated copy of the national database of stimulus road and bridge projects as of Sept. 25. Separately, we obtained data that states filed to the federal government as part of the stimulus legislation's reporting requirements. These data list which contractors had been awarded particular projects. We were able to trace more than 90 percent of the funds to individual counties. In a few other cases, projects are statewide and cannot be narrowed to county or serve multiple counties. We’ve indicated those cases in the data.
Wherever possible, we matched DOT projects to state recovery filings. They did not match in every instance. The DOT projects, which total $19 billion, include hundreds of projects not yet associated with a contractor. The contractors' data totals about $13 billion in obligated funds. In a few cases, state contractors did not match a DOT project. Some projects also have multiple contractors. When there is no matching contractor information for a project, searches and lists will return a blank.
We're trying to make this information as accurate as possible, so if you see something that needs to be corrected, please let us know.
Read more...
Here are our tips for running background checks on stimulus contractors.
All projects for Rockingham. Not all projects have been awarded contracts.
| Project Name | Contractor | County | Improvement Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US 29 FROM THE GUILFORD COUNTY LINE TO TROUBLESOME CREEK (Federal ID: 0029044) | W-L CONSTRUCTION & PAVING INC. | Rockingham | Pavement Improvement | $1,489,271 |
| BRIDGE EXPANSION JOINT REPAIR (Federal ID: 0029045) | No Contractor | Rockingham | Bridge Improvement | $160,000 |
| US 220 PAVEMENT JOINT AT NC 135 VIRGINIA STATE LINE; US 220 FROM NC 68 VIRGINIA STATE LINE (COMBINED WITH R-5180) (Federal ID: 0220041) | No Contractor | Rockingham | Pavement Improvement | $1,100,000 |