Skip to content
ProPublica
Donate
ProPublica
Donate
The Repatriation Database Data from Nov. 29, 2023

Caddo Nation of Oklahoma

A federally recognized Indian tribe with headquarters in Oklahoma

Institutions reported making the remains of more than 3,300 Native Americans available for return to the Caddo Nation of Oklahoma.

The tribe was also eligible to claim more than 126,400 associated funerary objects.

Institutions continue to hold the remains of at least 3,100 Native Americans taken from counties known to be of interest to the tribe.*

Where Native American remains made available for return to the Caddo Nation of Oklahoma were taken from

Each county is a peak
Height is amount of remains taken from county and made available by institutions for return to tribe
No remains taken from these counties made available for return to tribe
Institution that made remains available for return
Swipe interaction icon
Note: Remains of two Native Americans with no location information were made available for return to the Caddo Nation of Oklahoma.
Under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, when an institution establishes a connection between tribes and remains, it must publish a list of the tribes eligible to make a repatriation claim. The remains are then made available for return to the tribe(s). Once a tribal claim is made, physical transfer may occur. Many remains have been physically returned to tribes, but data on this is spotty because the law does not require institutions to report when these transfers occur.

These 32 institutions made Native American remains available for return to the Caddo Nation of Oklahoma.

InstitutionRemains Made Available for Return To Tribe
University of Oklahoma1,124
University of Arkansas915
University of Texas at Austin, Texas Archeological Research Laboratory311
U.S. Department of Defense199
Southern Methodist University181
Louisiana State University73
Texas Department of Transportation67
Gilcrease Museum62
U.S. Department of Agriculture56
Gregg County Historical Museum51
Texas A and M University50
Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department45
Indiana University44
Stephen F. Austin State University42
Baylor University, Mayborn Museum Complex38
Pittsburg State University19
Louisiana Department of Culture, Recreation, and Tourism11
Dallas Water Utilities10
County of Nacogdoches8
U.S. Department of the Interior6
New York University, College of Dentistry5
Northwestern State University of Louisiana, Williamson Museum4
Harvard University3
Texarkana Museums System3
University of Iowa, Office of the State Archaeologist3
University of Southern Mississippi, Department of Anthropology and Sociology3
Beloit College, Logan Museum of Anthropology2
Denver Museum of Nature and Science2
American Museum of Natural History1
Missouri Department of Natural Resources1
Shiloh Museum of Ozark History1
Texas Parks and Wildlife1

Timeline of Native American remains made available for return to the Caddo Nation of Oklahoma

Tribal and institutional capacity, funding, staffing, regulatory changes, audits, Review Committee decisions and litigation may influence timelines. Under NAGPRA, institutions determine whether Native American remains may be returned through cultural affiliation using evidence such as tribal traditional knowledge and biological and archaeological links, or through disposition based on geographic affiliation.

These institutions have not made available for return the remains of at least 3,100 Native Americans that were taken from counties known to be of interest to the Caddo Nation of Oklahoma.

These are estimates calculated using remains not made available for return from counties that the tribe has previously been eligible to claim remains from, as well as counties that the tribe has indicated interest in to the federal government. They are not comprehensive figures. The tribe may not wish to claim the remains, and other tribes may also seek to claim them.
InstitutionRemains Not Made Available for Return That Were Taken From Counties of Interest to the Tribe
Univ. of Oklahoma2,111
Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History (2,105)
Oklahoma Archeological Survey (6)
Dept. of Defense368
Tulsa District (207)
Little Rock District (54)
Fort Worth District (53)
Vicksburg District (49)
National Museum of Health and Medicine (5)
Univ. of Texas at Austin204
Dept. of the Interior130
Natchitoches National Fish Hatchery (100)
Buffalo National River (29)
D'Arbonne National Wildlife Refuge (1)
Univ. of Louisiana at Monroe99
Univ. of Missouri, Columbia43
Univ. of Arkansas35
Robert S. Peabody Institute of Archaeology32
American Museum of Natural History26
Harvard Univ.17
Louisiana State Univ.13
Missouri Dept. of Transportation8
Texas A and M Univ.8
Commerce (5)
Dept. of Anthropology (3)
Univ. of North Texas6
Gilcrease Museum5
Houston Museum of Natural Science5
Missouri Dept. of Natural Resources5
San Bernardino County Museum4
Nassau County Dept. of Parks and Recreation3
Texas Historical Commission3
West Texas A and M Univ.3
Tioga Point Museum2
Dept. of Agriculture2
City of Fort Smith1
Field Museum1
Missouri Historical Society1
Museum of New Mexico, Museum of Indian Arts and Culture1
No Man's Land Historical Society1
Northwestern State Univ. of Louisiana1
Rochester Museum and Science Center1
Texas Dept. of Transportation1
Univ. of California, Riverside1
Univ. of Tulsa1
Wichita County Sherriff's Office1
Counties of interest used in estimate include: Benton, Boone, Bradley, Calhoun, Carroll, Clark, Cleveland, Columbia, Craighead, Crawford, Crittenden, Dallas, Franklin, Garland, Grant, Hempstead, Hot Spring, Howard, Jackson, Johnson, Lafayette, Lawrence, Little River, Logan, Madison, Miller, Montgomery, Nevada, Newton, Ouachita, Perry, Pike, Polk, Pope, Saline, Scott, Sebastian, Sevier, Stone, Union, Washington and Yell in Arkansas. Kings in California. Bienville, Bossier, Caddo, Caldwell, Claiborne, De Soto, Grant, Jackson, Lasalle, Lincoln, Morehouse, Natchitoches, Ouachita, Rapides, Red River, Sabine, Union, Vernon, Webster and Winn in Louisiana. Barry, Mcdonald and Newton in Missouri. Adair, Atoka, Bryan, Caddo, Cherokee, Choctaw, Comanche, Cotton, Craig, Delaware, Haskell, Hughes, Kay, Latimer, Le Flore, Mayes, Mcclain, Mccurtain, Mcintosh, Murray, Muskogee, Nowata, Oklahoma, Ottawa, Payne, Pittsburg, Pontotoc, Pushmataha, Rogers, Sequoyah and Wagoner in Oklahoma. Anderson, Archer, Bell, Bowie, Camp, Cass, Cherokee, Collin, Cooke, Dallas, Delta, Falls, Fannin, Franklin, Freestone, Gregg, Harris, Harrison, Henderson, Hill, Hood, Hopkins, Houston, Hunt, Jasper, Kaufman, Lamar, Mclennan, Milam, Morris, Nacogdoches, Navarro, Newton, Panola, Polk, Rains, Red River, Rockwall, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith, Titus, Trinity, Tyler, Upshur, Van Zandt, Wichita, Wood and Young in Texas.
Get in touch

Know how an institution is handling repatriation? Have a personal story to share? We'd like to hear from you.

Learn how to report on repatriation

Watch an informational webinar with our reporters.

Sign up for the newsletter
About the Data

This tool presents a dataset maintained by the National Park Service containing all the Native American human remains and associated funerary objects that institutions have reported to the federal government under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. The dataset includes information about the state and county where remains and objects were taken from, which institutions hold them and whether they have been made available for return to tribes.

The data is self-reported by institutions. The amount of unrepatriated Native American remains reported by institutions is a minimum estimate of individuals and institutions frequently adjust these numbers when they reinventory groups of remains. Some institutions that are subject to NAGPRA have also entirely failed to report the remains in their possession. As a result, the numbers provided are best taken as estimates. The actual number and geographic scope of what’s held by publicly funded institutions is larger than what is presently documented.

ProPublica supplemented this dataset with information about cultural affiliation and disposition to specific tribes by systematically parsing the text of Notices of Inventory Completion published in the Federal Register. An additional dataset from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Tribal Directory Assessment Tool, was used for the section on remains not made available for return from counties that each tribe has indicated interest in to the federal government.

Institution location and tribal headquarters location information was provided by National NAGPRA. The location of some groups that are not federally recognized was provided through research by ProPublica.

Institutions that are part of a larger entity are grouped. (For example, the Mesa Verde National Park is part of the U.S. Department of the Interior.)

Institutions that have not submitted information to the federal government are not listed. The Smithsonian Institution is not listed because its repatriation process falls under the National Museum of the American Indian Act and it is not required to publicly report its holdings with the same detail as institutions subject to NAGPRA.

If you work for an institution and would like to provide comment on your institution’s repatriation efforts, please email [email protected]. If you think the data is incorrect or have a data request, please get in touch. We are aware of some issues with the accuracy of location information and tribes mistakenly being identified for disposition of Native American remains in published notices.

If you want to share something else with ProPublica, we’d like to hear from you.

If you have questions about implementing or complying with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, get in touch with National NAGPRA or the NAGPRA Community of Practice.

We use the word “tribes” to refer to all groups that institutions made Native American remains available to under NAGPRA. This includes tribes, nations, bands, pueblos, communities, Native Alaskan villages, Native Hawaiian organizations and non-federally recognized groups.

Data sources from Department of the Interior, National Park Service, National NAGPRA Program, the Federal Register, Department of Housing and Development, Tribal Directory Assessment Tool