California • CA-18 Congressional District
Top 10 Largest Contracts
| IN MERCED COUNTY IN AND NEAR DOS PALOS, FR... | CA / Merced |
$1,847,696
|
| IN MERCED COUNTY IN AND NEAR DOS PALOS, FR... | CA / Merced |
$1,333,993
|
| Total # Projects: | 9 |
| Total # Contracts: | 2 |
| Total $ Projects: | $48,419,552 |
| Total $ Contracts: | $3,181,689 |
Congressmembers
- Sen. Barbara Boxer (D) See Campaign Finances
- Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D) See Campaign Finances
- Rep. Dennis Cardoza (D) See Campaign Finances
Other Congressional Districts
| Project $ | |
|---|---|
| CA-01 | $31,850,728 |
| CA-02 | $99,050,558 |
| CA-03 | $25,212,824 |
| CA-04 | $98,285,136 |
| CA-05 | $5,836,013 |
| CA-06 | $16,307,410 |
| CA-07 | $14,603,000 |
| CA-08 | $10,928,000 |
| CA-09 | $26,023,494 |
| CA-10 | $20,480,000 |
| CA-11 | $36,600,605 |
| CA-12 | $19,192,220 |
| CA-13 | $12,181,000 |
| CA-14 | $16,797,500 |
| CA-15 | $9,791,000 |
| CA-16 | $16,036,000 |
| CA-17 | $23,238,255 |
| CA-19 | $34,298,005 |
| CA-20 | $17,801,181 |
| CA-21 | $28,355,982 |
| CA-22 | $30,077,408 |
| CA-23 | $21,888,769 |
| CA-24 | $22,557,511 |
| CA-25 | $45,344,019 |
| CA-26 | $4,779,000 |
| CA-27 | $19,853,000 |
| CA-28 | $0 |
| CA-29 | $9,792,500 |
| CA-30 | $10,960,206 |
| CA-31 | $0 |
| CA-32 | $0 |
| CA-32 | $17,215,361 |
| CA-33 | $0 |
| CA-34 | $53,413,714 |
| CA-35 | $16,523,706 |
| CA-36 | $6,819,000 |
| CA-37 | $18,233,609 |
| CA-38 | $15,441,431 |
| CA-39 | $12,105,387 |
| CA-40 | $9,425,479 |
| CA-41 | $13,212,828 |
| CA-42 | $15,325,321 |
| CA-43 | $128,116,032 |
| CA-44 | $7,994,800 |
| CA-45 | $57,578,012 |
| CA-46 | $6,751,971 |
| CA-47 | $6,792,704 |
| CA-48 | $21,517,050 |
| CA-49 | $109,245,664 |
| CA-50 | $12,543,450 |
| CA-51 | $85,414,053 |
| CA-52 | $0 |
| CA-53 | $4,002,427 |
| Show/hide all |
Collaborate
These news organizations have followed up and written stories using this database:
- PBS NewsHour/Patchwork Nation analyzed how transportation stimulus funds were distributed across communities.
Add yourself to this list: News organizations are welcome to use data here in their own stories. Please credit ProPublica for providing the data. If you have a good story to share or collaborate on, contact Senior Editor Tom Detzel
Questions? Tips?
About This Data
Note: To build this database, ProPublica obtained two sets of records from the U.S. Department of Transportation. We cleaned it to remove duplicates and other discrepancies, but it may have mistakes we didn't catch. If you find one, please let us know and include any information that may help us verify the correction. Also, the federal data is based on the states’ monthly reporting and may not be up-to-date.
First, we received an updated copy of the national database of stimulus road and bridge projects as of Sept. 25. Separately, we obtained data that states filed to the federal government as part of the stimulus legislation's reporting requirements. These data list which contractors had been awarded particular projects. We were able to trace more than 90 percent of the funds to individual counties. In a few other cases, projects are statewide and cannot be narrowed to county or serve multiple counties. We’ve indicated those cases in the data.
Wherever possible, we matched DOT projects to state recovery filings. They did not match in every instance. The DOT projects, which total $19 billion, include hundreds of projects not yet associated with a contractor. The contractors' data totals about $13 billion in obligated funds. In a few cases, state contractors did not match a DOT project. Some projects also have multiple contractors. When there is no matching contractor information for a project, searches and lists will return a blank.
We're trying to make this information as accurate as possible, so if you see something that needs to be corrected, please let us know.
Read more...
Here are our tips for running background checks on stimulus contractors.
All projects for CA-18. Not all projects have been awarded contracts.
| Project Name | Contractor | County | Improvement Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IN MERCED COUNTY IN AND NEAR DOS PALOS, FROM FRESNO COUNTY LINE TO STATE ROUTE 152; AND IN STANISLAUS COUNTY AT AND NEAR WESTLEY TO 0.1 MILE SOUTH OF RODGERS ROAD TO SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY LINE. (Federal ID: P033068) | Unknown Company 191149 | Merced | Pavement Improvement | $1,333,993 |
| IN MERCED COUNTY IN AND NEAR DOS PALOS, FROM FRESNO COUNTY LINE TO STATE ROUTE 152; AND IN STANISLAUS COUNTY AT AND NEAR WESTLEY TO 0.1 MILE SOUTH OF RODGERS ROAD TO SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY LINE. (Federal ID: P033068) | TEICHERTCONSTRUCTION | Merced | Pavement Improvement | $1,847,696 |
| HMA OVERLAY ON 16TH ST. FROM G TO V ST. (Federal ID: 5085019) | No Contractor | Merced | Pavement Improvement | $1,555,750 |
| RECONSTRUCTION OF 18TH STREET FROM N TO G STREET, G STREET FROM 16TH TO 23RD STREET AND M STREET FROM 16TH TO BEAR CREEK (Federal ID: 5085020) | No Contractor | Merced | Other | $75,000 |
| RECONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALKS AND RAMPS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA IN THE CITY OF GUSTINE (Federal ID: 5230002) | No Contractor | Merced | Other | $15,000 |
| SHAFFER ROAD - AC OVERLAY AND PARTIAL RECONSTRUCTION (Federal ID: 5254012) | No Contractor | Merced | Pavement Improvement | $568,723 |
| JUNIPER AVE. - AC OVERLAY AND PARTIAL RECONSTRUCTION (Federal ID: 5254013) | No Contractor | Merced | Pavement Improvement | $532,125 |
| PROJECT INVOLVES ROAD GRINDING, REPLACEMENT OF ASPHALT CONCRETE, CRACK SEALING OF ROAD, SLURRY SEAL, REPLACING ROAD MARKERS, AND REPLACING STRIPING AND TRAFFIC CONTROL IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. (Federal ID: 5256009) | No Contractor | Merced | Pavement Improvement | $550,803 |
| IN MERCED COUNTY, FROM NORTH OF V STREET TO BLACK RASCAL BRIDGE #39-0131R/L. (Federal ID: P099521) | No Contractor | Merced | Pavement Improvement | $41,196,664 |
| IN NEWMAN, FROM INYO STREET TO SOUTH OF JENSEN ROAD; ALSO IN PATTERSON FROM SOUTH OF SPERRY ROAD TO VAN ORMER RAIL ROAD GRADE CROSSING. (Federal ID: S033069) | No Contractor | Stanislaus | Pavement Improvement | $2,591,494 |