ER Inspector ALASKA NATIVE MEDICAL CENTERALASKA NATIVE MEDICAL CENTER

ER Inspector

Find and Evaluate Every Emergency Room Near You

Updated September 19, 2019

This database was last updated in September 2019. It should only be used as a historical snapshot.Researchers can find more recent data on timely and effective care in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospitals datasets and guidance about hospital regulations.

If you are having a heart attack or life-threatening emergency, call 911.

ER Inspector » Alaska » ALASKA NATIVE MEDICAL CENTER

Don’t see your ER? Find out why it might be missing.

ALASKA NATIVE MEDICAL CENTER

4315 diplomacy dr, anchorage, Alaska 99508

(907) 729-3971

67% of Patients Would "Definitely Recommend" this Hospital
(Alaska Avg: 66%)

2 violations related to ER care since 2015

Hospital Type

Acute Care Hospitals

Hospital Owner

Government - Federal

ER Volume

High (40K - 60K patients a year)

See this hospital's CMS profile page or inspection reports.

Patient Pathways Through This ER

After a patient arrives at the emergency room, they are typically seen by a doctor or medical practitioner and then either sent home or admitted to the hospital and taken to a room. A small percentage of patients leave without being seen. The chart below shows on average how long each of these pathways take. Lower numbers are better, and all times refer to the average length of time people waited.

Arrives at ER
4% of patients leave without being seen
6hrs 54min Admitted to hospital
10hrs 10min Taken to room
1hr 44min Sent home

All wait times are average.

Detailed Quality Measures

Here is a more in depth look at each quality measure, compared to state and national averages for hospitals with high ER volumes. Experts caution that very small differences between hospitals for a given measure are unlikely to correspond to noticeable differences in the real world.

Measure
Average for this Hospital
How this Hospital Compares

(to other hospitals with similar
ER volumes, when available)

Discharged Patients
Time Until Sent Home

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being sent home (if not admitted).

1hr 44min
National Avg.
2hrs 42min
Alaska Avg.
1hr 44min
This Hospital
1hr 44min
Impatient Patients
Left Without
Being Seen

Percentage of patients who left the emergency room without being seen by a doctor or medical practitioner.

4%
Avg. U.S. Hospital
2%
Avg. Alaska Hospital
2%
This Hospital
4%
Admitted Patients
Time Before Admission

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being admitted to the hospital.

6hrs 54min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
5hrs 4min
Alaska Avg.
6hrs 54min
This Hospital
6hrs 54min
Admitted Patients
Transfer Time

Among patients admitted, additional time they spent waiting before being taken to their room (sometimes referred to as "boarding time.")

3hrs 16min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
2hrs 2min
Alaska Avg.
3hrs 16min
This Hospital
3hrs 16min
Special Patients
CT Scan

Percentage of patients who arrived with stroke symptoms and did not receive brain scan results within 45 mins.

No Data Available

No cases met the criteria for this measure.

National Avg.
27%
Alaska Avg.
42%
This Hospital
No Data Available

Violations Related to ER Care

Problems found in emergency rooms at this hospital since 2015, as identified during the investigation of a complaint. About This Data →

Violation
Full Text
STABILIZING TREATMENT

Nov 16, 2017

. Based on record review, policy review and interviews the facility failed to: 1) ensure stabilization of an emergency medical condition (EMC) within their capacity and capability.

See More ↓

. Based on record review, policy review and interviews the facility failed to: 1) ensure stabilization of an emergency medical condition (EMC) within their capacity and capability. Instead transferred an unstable patient to a facility where the Specialty Consult Services and stabilizing treatment of the EMC was known to not be available. Findings: Record review from 11/13-16/17, of the Emergency Department (ED) registration and transfer logs dated from 5/1 - 11/11/17 revealed Patient #9 had been admitted on [DATE], transferred from the ED on 10/27/17 to JBER (Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson) and readmitted on [DATE], patient stabilizing treatment was delayed more than 24 hours. Review of Patient #9's medical record, dated 10/26/17, revealed "Per Dr. [Rheumatolgist] note on 10/26/17: "[Patient #9] is at increased risk for ILD [interstitial lung disease] ... RNA Pol III confers an increased risk of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] renal crisis ... I discussed the severity of the situation with the patient and recommended admission for further evaluation and treatment. I discussed the severity of the situation with the patient and recommended admission for further evaluation and treatment. I discussed the case with Dr. [name] ... at JBER .... He feels that the patient would be best served at ANMC. He is not sure that they are able to infuse IVIG or if they have it in stock at this time. No available inpatient rheumatology consults at JBER, Providence, or AK Regional Hospitals. This is a very rare, life threatening condition that will requiring ongoing evaluation and treatment by a rheumatologist therefore I feel it is in the patient's best interest to be admitted to ANMC, where the rheumatology consultation is available ... I have discussed this case and the recommendations above with, [Intensivist], [ED MD], and [Hospitalist]." Review of the ED MD #3 Provider note, dated 10/26/17 at 5:02 pm, revealed a triage "Chief complaint: Pt sent from rheumatology clinic, hx systemic [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Has increased weakness and falls. History of present illness: ...presents with weakness, difficulty swallowing, breathing, strength, walking ... in the care of Rheumatology and is experiencing weakness to the point of falling and raising her head off the bed." Further review of the ED MD Provider note revealed "Medical Decision Making Rationale: patient has highly technical and highly dangerous condition related to her systemic [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] and her Rheumatologist make sure the patient is going to get admission and IVIG and communicates frequently and helpfully and since the patient will need close monitoring for weakness leading to respiratory/ventilatory failure, admission to step down or ICU level is made." Review of the "Out-of-Hospital Transfer Record," dated 10/27/17 at [11:45 pm] revealed the Patient was transferred to JBER at 00:30 am for "continuity of care with primary team." Further review of the ED record revealed Patient #9 was transported by EMS to JBER on 10/27/17 at 12:55 am , and returned to the ANMC ED via EMS on 10/27/17 at 12:52 pm. JBER: Admission H&P Review of the JBER "Admission History and Physical," signed and dated 10/27/17 at 5:06 am, revealed "History was obtained from patient and review of records from ANMC send with patient upon transfer. Attempted to review record in AHLTA multiple times prior to and after arrival, however message received "unable to connect to server ...[patient] was being followed by Rheumatology at ANMC as none available here at JBER ... given she was a beneficiary here at JBER as well as a bed shortage which was noted and she was accepted for transfer here for further evaluation and treatment." JBER Discharge/Transfer Note 10/27/17 Review of the JBER "Hospital Course/Narrative Summary dated 10/26/27 - 10/27/17 signed at 10:53" by a new JBER MD, revealed, "We requested records from ANMC and discovered very clear instructions from patient's Rheumatologist that the patient needs to be seen at a facility with inpatient rheumatology as well as receive IVIG. Unfortunately this was not communicated last night to our nocturnist. I spoke with Dr. [Rheumatologist] this morning who confirmed she highly recommends patient be transferred back to ANMC ..." Interviews During a Surveyor initiated telephone interview, on 11/14/17 at 5:55 pm, MD #1. [Rheumatologist] stated she discussed with the ED MD and the Hospitalist before transferring the patient to the ED, and explained the need for admission to ANMC for Rheumatology consult and the conversation she had with the Patient primary MD at JBER. In addition, she explained to the ED MD and Hospitalist how critical the Patient was and how quickly she could deteriorate. During an interview on 11/14/17 at 1:35 pm, MD #3 stated because Patient #9 had been seen by the Hospitalist and was to be admitted , she provided a brief summary hand off report to oncoming MD #5 A transfer consent or handoff to JBER was not needed. During an interview on 11/16/17 at 6:15 pm, MD #5 stated he provided a brief summary hand off report to MD #2 after being told by the Nursing Supervisor Patient #9 was not going to be admitted to ANMC, but was going to be transferred to JBER. The MD also stated at the time the ED was very busy, the acuity was high, and he was not in a position to take the time to review the entire Patient medical record when he was told by the Nursing Supervisor he needed to call report to the receiving MD #2. In addition, he stated he had been told by MD #3 the Patient had been seen by the Hospitalist and waiting transfer to telemetry or ICU. He felt the transfer should have been given to the Hospitalist. During an interview on 11/30/17 at 7:00 am, MD #2 stated she had not been informed of the Rheumatologist specific request for the Patient to remain at ANMC until the patient arrived, the ED provider notes had been reviewed, and the Patient had expressed her concerns with the transfer. The MD consulted with the morning Hospitalist, who initiated transfer back to ANMC after consultation with the Rheumatologist. During an interview on 11/15/17 at 11:45 am MD #4 stated on 10/27/17 he does not recall having been consulted about the decision to transfer Patient #9 to JBER, but rather was told the Patient was being transferred to JBER by the Nurse Supervisor. During an interview on 11/16/17 at 12:03 pm the Interim Chief Medical Officer (CMO) /Hospitalist Medical Director stated the decision to transfer was done collaboratively between the ED MDs, Hospitalist, or Intensivists when the census was high. She also stated if the Hospitalist or Intensivist had accepted admission of an ED patient, it would be them who should call the receiving MD to transfer care. The CMO/Hospitalist Medical Director was also asked if she was aware of Patient #9's transfer to JBER with a return to ANMC less than 12 hours later due to JBERs lack of ability to provide the consulting services for Rheumatology. She stated yes, she had reviewed the transfer and stated it was an appropriate transfer; JBER has accepted the transfer and the Patient was stable. JBER MD had accepted the patient. When asked if patients were ever held in the ED for an admission bed, to include ICU and telemetry, she stated yes. When asked if the facility had a policy on how the Transfer Call Center or Nursing Supervisors use to triage transfers, she stated they did not. Out of Hospital Transfer Form Review of the "Out of Hospital Transfer," form dated 10/26/17 at [11:45 pm], revealed under "Document specific risk/benefits to specific patient: Continuity of care with primary team." Consent was signed by MD #5. Patient Interview During Surveyor initiated telephone interview, on 11/20/17 at 2:10 pm, Patient #9 stated she was not told she was going to JBER hospital until about 30 minutes before the ambulance arrived. She stated she was told by the RN that there were no longer beds available for her at ANMC. The patient stated she had already been told she was going to be admitted to ANMC and questioned the RN if the Rheumatologist had been notified and the RN stated she was not sure. The Patient also stated she was very concerned about going to JBER because of the discussion the Rheumatologist had with her today before the ambulance brought her to the ANMC ED. When asked if the risk and benefits of the transfer had been explained to her, she stated they had not. She said she was told by the RN she had to go because there were no beds available at ANMC. Policy Review of the hospital policy "EMS/EMTALA Transfer Procedure," dated 5/17/17, revealed "To ensure ANMC complies with its obligations under EMTALA ...; Appropriate Transfer: ...individual is stable ... the individual will sustain no material deterioration in his or her medical condition as a result of or during the transfer to the receiving facility ... ANMC has provided medical treatment with in its capacity that minimizes the risks ..." .

See Less ↑
APPROPRIATE TRANSFER

Nov 16, 2017

Based on record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure: 1) documentation of medical benefits and risk of transfer specific to the patient; 2) Consent for transfer had been signed by the patient or their representative; 3) documentation of qualified personnel and equipment needed for transfer; 4) medical records specific to transfer were available for the receiving hospital; 5) implementation of EMTALA policy.

See More ↓

Based on record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure: 1) documentation of medical benefits and risk of transfer specific to the patient; 2) Consent for transfer had been signed by the patient or their representative; 3) documentation of qualified personnel and equipment needed for transfer; 4) medical records specific to transfer were available for the receiving hospital; 5) implementation of EMTALA policy. Findings: Mode of Transfer Record review from 11/4 - 17/17 of the following selected emergency department transfers revealed the "Out-of- Hospital Transfer Record" did not identify the level of qualified personnel needed for transfer: Patient #1: transferred on 10/7/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]" Patient #2: transferred on 11/8/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]" Patient #3: transferred on 10/30/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]" Patient #4: transferred on 10/2/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]" Patient #5: transferred on 5/18/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]" Patient #6: transferred on 5/11/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]" Patient #7: transferred on 6/23/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]" Patient #8: transferred on 11/9/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]" Patient #9: transferred on 10/27/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]" Patient #10: transferred on 9/15/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]" Patient #11: transferred on 10/12/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]" Patient #12: transferred on 6/30/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]" Patient #13: transferred on 10/13/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]" Patient #14: transferred on 8/5/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]" Patient #18: transferred on 8/19/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]" Transfer Form/Consent Record review from 11/4 - 17/17 of the following selected emergency department transfers revealed the "Out-of- Hospital Transfer." Record did not identify medical benefits and risk of transfer specific to the patient and or had no documented consent to transfer: Patient #3: transferred on 10/30/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] Patient #5: transferred on 5/18/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] Patient #10: transferred on 9/15/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] Patient #15: transferred on 10/6/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] Patient #16: transferred on 9/17/17 with a chief complaint of slurred speech, (per MD documentation patient was to be seen at another hospital) revealed no consent or Out of Hospital Transfer Form. Patient #20: transferred on 10/19/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] Patient #21: transferred on 11/5/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] Patient #22: transferred on 10/19/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] Risk & Benefit Patient #1: transferred on 10/7/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] Patient #3: transferred on 10/30/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] Patient #6: transferred on 5/11/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] Patient #9: transferred on 10/27/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] Patient #12: transferred on 6/30/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] Patient #13: transferred on 10/13/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] Patient #17: transferred on 10/8/17 with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] During an interview on 11/17/17 the Administrative/CMS Assistant confirmed he was unable to locate the Out-of-Hospital Form/Patient consent for the above listed medical records. Review of the hospital policy "EMS/EMTALA Transfer Procedure" dated 5/17/17, revealed "Physician responsibilities: document the risks and benefits associated with the transfer, an assessment of whether the risks outweigh the benefits and why, and what treatment, personnel or equipment are needed prior to an during transport to minimize the risk of the transfer ..." Transfer Log and EMTALA Policy Implementation Record review from 11/13 - 17/17 of the 2 transfer logs provided by the Administrative /CMS Assistant revealed inconsistent transfer data. "ED Discharge to outside May - Present" revealed: May: 12 transfers June: 14 transfers July: 16 transfers August: 16 transfers September: 15 transfers October: 24 transfers "Disposition log" dated 5/1/17 - 11/14/17: May: 11 transfers June: 11 transfers July: 15 transfers August: 14 Transfers September: 13 transfers October: 20 transfers Review of the EMTALA transfer audit log dated 5/1 - 10/31/17 revealed: May: 13 charts were reviewed June: 10 charts were reviewed July: 16 charts were reviewed August: 13 charts were reviewed September: 14 charts were reviewed October: 6 charts were reviewed Review of the hospital policy "EMS/EMTALA Transfer Procedure" dated 5/17/17, revealed "To ensure ANMC complies with its obligations under EMTALA... ...Registered Nurse Responsibilities ... Verify the Emergency transfer record is complete ... House Supervisors Responsibilities ... verify that all EMTALA requirements have been met and all transfer forms are complete and accurate ..." Record review of Patient #8 transferred on 11/9/17 at 4:35 am with a diagnosis of [DIAGNOSES REDACTED].

See Less ↑
Notes

“Average time” refers to the median wait time (the midpoint of all patients' wait times). References to “doctor or medical practitioner” indicate a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. CMS reports the CT scan quality measure as the percentage of patients who received a scan within 45 minutes. We have reversed that measure so that all measures follow a “lower is better” pattern.

Additional design and development by Mike Tigas and Sisi Wei.

Sources

All data comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Detailed quality measures at the hospital, state and national level were last updated September 2019. Most data was collected between October 2017 and October 2018. Data on ER-related violations is from January 2015 to June 2019.

Additional Info

How We've Updated ER Inspector | Download ProPublica's Emergency Room Planning Toolkit | About This Data

Don’t See Your ER?

In some cases we aren’t able to identify the exact location of a hospital, so it doesn’t appear on our mapped search results. However, it may still be in our database – try looking for it in the list of hospitals on each state's page.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from our database because it doesn't have an emergency department.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from the federal government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data. There are a couple of reasons why a hospital isn’t included in CMS data: it may not participate in Medicare, or it may share a certification number with another hospital (common across large hospital systems).

If you notice a hospital missing from our database, please first check if you can find it on CMS' website, and that it is listed as having an ER. If so, please email us with the hospital name and address.