ER Inspector DREW MEMORIAL HOSPITALDREW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

ER Inspector

Find and Evaluate Every Emergency Room Near You

Updated September 19, 2019

This database was last updated in September 2019. It should only be used as a historical snapshot.Researchers can find more recent data on timely and effective care in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospitals datasets and guidance about hospital regulations.

If you are having a heart attack or life-threatening emergency, call 911.

ER Inspector » Arkansas » DREW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

Don’t see your ER? Find out why it might be missing.

DREW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

778 scogin drive, monticello, Ark. 71655

(870) 367-2411

69% of Patients Would "Definitely Recommend" this Hospital
(Ark. Avg: 71%)

2 violations related to ER care since 2015

Hospital Type

Acute Care Hospitals

Hospital Owner

Voluntary non-profit - Private

ER Volume

Low (0 - 20K patients a year)

See this hospital's CMS profile page or inspection reports.

Patient Pathways Through This ER

After a patient arrives at the emergency room, they are typically seen by a doctor or medical practitioner and then either sent home or admitted to the hospital and taken to a room. A small percentage of patients leave without being seen. The chart below shows on average how long each of these pathways take. Lower numbers are better, and all times refer to the average length of time people waited.

Arrives at ER
2% of patients leave without being seen
3hrs 40min Admitted to hospital
4hrs 24min Taken to room
2hrs 15min Sent home

All wait times are average.

Detailed Quality Measures

Here is a more in depth look at each quality measure, compared to state and national averages for hospitals with low ER volumes. Experts caution that very small differences between hospitals for a given measure are unlikely to correspond to noticeable differences in the real world.

Measure
Average for this Hospital
How this Hospital Compares

(to other hospitals with similar
ER volumes, when available)

Discharged Patients
Time Until Sent Home

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being sent home (if not admitted).

2hrs 15min
National Avg.
1hr 53min
Ark. Avg.
1hr 48min
This Hospital
2hrs 15min
Impatient Patients
Left Without
Being Seen

Percentage of patients who left the emergency room without being seen by a doctor or medical practitioner.

2%
Avg. U.S. Hospital
2%
Avg. Ark. Hospital
3%
This Hospital
2%
Admitted Patients
Time Before Admission

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being admitted to the hospital.

3hrs 40min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
3hrs 30min
Ark. Avg.
3hrs 14min
This Hospital
3hrs 40min
Admitted Patients
Transfer Time

Among patients admitted, additional time they spent waiting before being taken to their room (sometimes referred to as "boarding time.")

44min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
57min
Ark. Avg.
45min
This Hospital
44min
Special Patients
CT Scan

Percentage of patients who arrived with stroke symptoms and did not receive brain scan results within 45 mins.

86%
National Avg.
27%
Ark. Avg.
25%
This Hospital
86%

Violations Related to ER Care

Problems found in emergency rooms at this hospital since 2015, as identified during the investigation of a complaint. About This Data →

Violation
Full Text
ORGANIZATION AND DIRECTION

Sep 4, 2018

Based on policy and procedure review, Crash Cart check sheets review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one of one emergency room (ER) Crash Cart examined was checked every shift by ER personnel.

See More ↓

Based on policy and procedure review, Crash Cart check sheets review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one of one emergency room (ER) Crash Cart examined was checked every shift by ER personnel. Failure to check the crash cart every shift did not ensure the defibrillators were functional and working in the event they were needed for patient care. The failed practice had the potential to affect any patient whose care required the use of the defibrillator. Findings follow: A. Review of the policy and procedure titled "Crash Cart and Defibrillator Checklist Instructions," received at 1:40 PM on 08/30/18 showed the defibrillator was to be checked every day on each shift, as well as the contents and the medication list. When the above was accurate, the nurse was to sign her name. B. Review of the ER Crash Cart at 8:50 AM on 08/30/18 showed three (07/27/18-07/29/18) of 31 (07/01/18-07/31/18) night shifts were not documented as checked for the month of July. Review of the August checklist showed three (08/16/18, 08/26/18, and 08/29/18) of 28 (08/01/18-08/28/18) night shifts were not documented as checked. During an interview with the Chief Nursing Officer at 8:55 AM on 08/30/18 he verified the above findings. Based on policy and procedure review, clinical record review and interview, it was determined emergency room staff failed to follow policy and procedure in that two (#3 and #4) of twelve (#1-12) patients were not triaged or triaged at the level outlined in policy. Failure to follow the triage policy and procedure did not ensure the patients received the level of care required in a timeframe dictated by the triage assessment. The failed practice had the potential to affect Patients #3 and #4. Findings follow: A. Review of the policy and procedure titled "Triage Priority Classification," received from the Chief Quality Director at 9:00 AM on 08/30/18 showed a brief triage was to be conducted by the nurse, to determine the priority of care necessary and the appropriate area for further evaluation and treatment. Once categorized, all patients assigned an ESI (Emergency Severity Index) score of 1 and 2 were to be escorted to the treatment area and assigned a primary nurse upon triage. Review of the policy and procedure also showed patients who were high risk, confused, lethargic or disoriented, or in severe pain or distress were classified as a ESI Level 2. B. Review of Patient #3's clinical record showed lethargic listed under clinical presentation and an ESI score of 4 assigned by Registered Nurse #1 at 10:37 PM on 06/23/18. Per policy and procedure, the screening of lethargy should have placed Patient #3 at an ESI level of 2. C. Review of Patient #4's clinical record showed a Triage date and time of 8:12 PM on 07/08/18 by RN #3. Review of Patient #4's clinical record showed no ESI level documented. D. During an interview with the Clinical Documentation Improvement Manager at 11:43 AM on 08/30/18 the findings in B and C were verified.

See Less ↑
INTEGRATION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES

Apr 16, 2015

Based on observation, interview and review of policies and procedures, it was determined the Facility failed to assure cleaning of furniture, floors, counter tops and equipment in the Emergency Department was performed per Facility Policy.

See More ↓

Based on observation, interview and review of policies and procedures, it was determined the Facility failed to assure cleaning of furniture, floors, counter tops and equipment in the Emergency Department was performed per Facility Policy. The failed practice did not assure processes for cleaning and disinfection was integrated into the hospital standard policies and procedures and therefore cleaning and disinfection of surfaces could not be assured. The failed practice affected any patient treated in the Emergency Department. The findings were: 1) Observation on tour of the Emergency Department on 04/15/15 from 1400-1445, revealed: two bottles with blue liquid, one labeled as "NABC (Non-Acid Disinfectant Cleaner)" and one labeled as "Peroxy" on the counter in ER Room #2. RN #1 was asked what the product was used for and she stated "for our equipment and ". There was a cloth covered chair in the triage room that was soiled. 2) Housekeeper #1 was interviewed and stated the NABC was used for counters, walls and furniture disinfection and a Peroxy product is used on the floor. One of the bottles was labeled as Peroxy and was a blue color. Housekeeper #1 stated that it was mislabeled because the Peroxy product was clear, even though it was labeled Peroxy. The cloth furniture is cleaned when it looks dirty per Housekeeper #1. 3) The Environmental Services Director and Director of Maintenance Services reviewed the polices and procedures and manufactures directions for use and confirmed the following: the NABC product is for Bathroom cleaning; The super HDQ L 10 is to be used for hard non-porous services and allowed to remain wet for 10 minutes. Wet mopping is to be done with Super HDQL 10 as well. 4) Review of the Facility Policy "Cleaning supplies and chemicals" stated The Environmental Services Director and the Infection Control nurse will review all products intended for any level of disinfecting. Once the product is select for use, the Infection Control nurse will coordinate the review of the technical and material Safety Data Sheet on hospital grade disinfectant and tuberculosis by the Infection Control Committee and final approval prior to being put into use. Prior to the product becoming available to personnel for use, the Environmental Services Director will ensure the proper use and dilution procedure for the chemical is included in the Environmental Services Department continuing education program and all personnel are trained accordingly." The observations of the cleaning product and policies for use were confirmed at the time of observation by the Environmental Services Director.

See Less ↑
Notes

“Average time” refers to the median wait time (the midpoint of all patients' wait times). References to “doctor or medical practitioner” indicate a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. CMS reports the CT scan quality measure as the percentage of patients who received a scan within 45 minutes. We have reversed that measure so that all measures follow a “lower is better” pattern.

Additional design and development by Mike Tigas and Sisi Wei.

Sources

All data comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Detailed quality measures at the hospital, state and national level were last updated September 2019. Most data was collected between October 2017 and October 2018. Data on ER-related violations is from January 2015 to June 2019.

Additional Info

How We've Updated ER Inspector | Download ProPublica's Emergency Room Planning Toolkit | About This Data

Don’t See Your ER?

In some cases we aren’t able to identify the exact location of a hospital, so it doesn’t appear on our mapped search results. However, it may still be in our database – try looking for it in the list of hospitals on each state's page.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from our database because it doesn't have an emergency department.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from the federal government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data. There are a couple of reasons why a hospital isn’t included in CMS data: it may not participate in Medicare, or it may share a certification number with another hospital (common across large hospital systems).

If you notice a hospital missing from our database, please first check if you can find it on CMS' website, and that it is listed as having an ER. If so, please email us with the hospital name and address.