ER Inspector SAN JOAQUIN GENERAL HOSPITALSAN JOAQUIN GENERAL HOSPITAL

ER Inspector

Find and Evaluate Every Emergency Room Near You

Updated September 19, 2019

This database was last updated in September 2019. It should only be used as a historical snapshot.Researchers can find more recent data on timely and effective care in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospitals datasets and guidance about hospital regulations.

If you are having a heart attack or life-threatening emergency, call 911.

ER Inspector » California » SAN JOAQUIN GENERAL HOSPITAL

Don’t see your ER? Find out why it might be missing.

SAN JOAQUIN GENERAL HOSPITAL

500 w hospital road, french camp, Calif. 95231

(209) 468-6000

57% of Patients Would "Definitely Recommend" this Hospital
(Calif. Avg: 70%)

1 violation related to ER care since 2015

Hospital Type

Acute Care Hospitals

Hospital Owner

Government - Local

ER Volume

High (40K - 60K patients a year)

See this hospital's CMS profile page or inspection reports.

Patient Pathways Through This ER

After a patient arrives at the emergency room, they are typically seen by a doctor or medical practitioner and then either sent home or admitted to the hospital and taken to a room. A small percentage of patients leave without being seen. The chart below shows on average how long each of these pathways take. Lower numbers are better, and all times refer to the average length of time people waited.

Arrives at ER
6% of patients leave without being seen
9hrs 11min Admitted to hospital
14hrs 33min Taken to room
3hrs 22min Sent home

All wait times are average.

Detailed Quality Measures

Here is a more in depth look at each quality measure, compared to state and national averages for hospitals with high ER volumes. Experts caution that very small differences between hospitals for a given measure are unlikely to correspond to noticeable differences in the real world.

Measure
Average for this Hospital
How this Hospital Compares

(to other hospitals with similar
ER volumes, when available)

Discharged Patients
Time Until Sent Home

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being sent home (if not admitted).

3hrs 22min
National Avg.
2hrs 42min
Calif. Avg.
2hrs 54min
This Hospital
3hrs 22min
Impatient Patients
Left Without
Being Seen

Percentage of patients who left the emergency room without being seen by a doctor or medical practitioner.

6%
Avg. U.S. Hospital
2%
Avg. Calif. Hospital
2%
This Hospital
6%
Admitted Patients
Time Before Admission

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being admitted to the hospital.

9hrs 11min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
5hrs 4min
Calif. Avg.
5hrs 46min
This Hospital
9hrs 11min
Admitted Patients
Transfer Time

Among patients admitted, additional time they spent waiting before being taken to their room (sometimes referred to as "boarding time.")

5hrs 22min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
2hrs 2min
Calif. Avg.
2hrs 46min
This Hospital
5hrs 22min
Special Patients
CT Scan

Percentage of patients who arrived with stroke symptoms and did not receive brain scan results within 45 mins.

18%
National Avg.
27%
Calif. Avg.
28%
This Hospital
18%

Violations Related to ER Care

Problems found in emergency rooms at this hospital since 2015, as identified during the investigation of a complaint. About This Data →

Violation
Full Text
ON CALL PHYSICIANS

May 9, 2016

Based on staff interviews and facility document and record reviews, the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) failed to ensure that an on-call physician, an obstetrician/ gynecologist (MD 1), responded to the Emergency Department (ED) to address the needs of a critically ill patient (Patient A) in severe septic shock in a reasonable amount of time on 8/11/14.

See More ↓

Based on staff interviews and facility document and record reviews, the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) failed to ensure that an on-call physician, an obstetrician/ gynecologist (MD 1), responded to the Emergency Department (ED) to address the needs of a critically ill patient (Patient A) in severe septic shock in a reasonable amount of time on 8/11/14. The failure of the on call physician consultant to respond to Patient 1's Emergent Medical Condition for four hours, forty five minutes may have contributed to the death of Patient A. Findings: Patient A was admitted on [DATE], two days after an uncomplicated birth at the GACH with complaints of vaginal bleeding, nausea, vomiting and loss of vision. A document reviewed titled Initial Nursing Assessment noted Patient A's admission vital signs, taken at 12:51 p.m., were: blood pressure (bp): 81/56 (norm is 100/60 to 140/90), pulse (p): 110 (norm is 60-100), temperature (t): 36.6 centigrade (97.8 F), and respirations: 18 (12-20 is norm). This document also identified that Patient A had a pale appearance and was lethargic (sluggish). Patient A was seen by a Physician's Assistant (PA 1) (trained to practice medicine on a team under the supervision of physicians and surgeons) at 1:10 p.m. PA 1 documented on the ED Chart that Patient A said she had vaginal bleeding, "a lot" since 5 a.m., soaking 4 pads in an hour and also complained about a foul odor. PA 1 ordered a blood test and the results were returned at 1:30 p.m. The result was that the White Blood Cells (WBCs) were at 41.5, a very high result indicating an infectious process (normal range is 4.5 -11.0). The diagnoses documented by PA 1 on the document titled Emergency Department Chart, page 2 were 1. Septic Shock, 2. DIC (a serious coagulation conditon in which blood clots form in small blood vessels), 3.Endometritis (ionflammatory conditon of the lining of the uterus), 4. Retained products of conception. The start time on this document was 1:10 p.m. PA 1 documented a call for an OB Gyn consult to MD 1 at 2:50 p.m. MD 1 called back at 3 p.m. and had PA 1 repeat the blood tests and ordered an ultrasound to be done of the pelvis of Patient A. The second blood test, completed at 5 p.m., showed that the WBC count was then 52.5. PA 1 documented another call to MD 1 at 6 p.m., but there was no response time noted on the record and MD 1 did not come to the ED to see Patient A. An ED Nursing Progress Note at 4:35 p.m. documented Patient A's blood pressure as 84/55 and the pulse was 98. At 6 p.m. the nurse documented that Patient A was waiting for the OB consult. At this time there had been a 3 hour plus time lapse from the first call PA 1 made requesting a consult. At 7: 30 p.m. nursing documentation indicated that an ED MD was at the bedside to examine the patient. The OB Gyn consultant had still not inquired about or seen Patient 1. At that time Patient A's blood pressure was 87/systolic and heart rate was 130 (normal range is 60-100). At 7:35 p.m. MD 1 was documented as being at the bedside to see Patient A for the first time (four and three quarters hours after consult request). On 5/7/15 at 12:45 p.m. an interview was conducted with the ED Manager (EDM) regarding expected response times for MDs called for consultation in the ED. The EDM stated she would expect a response time of 15- 30 minutes for a physician to physician discussion or an actual patient visit. On 5/21/15, at 2:03 p.m., the Medical Director of the ED was interviewed by phone. When asked about the expected response time to a call from the ED he said "I think the Hospital bylaws have a 30 minute standard." On 5/14/15 at 8:05 a.m. a phone interview was conducted with the MD 1. MD 1 said the "ED response time depends on what is needed, a phone consult for advice versus an actual patient visit, "I can't really generalize a time". MD 1 acknowledged if it was urgent he could be there in minutes as" OB is right above the ED". When asked about the documented request to the call regarding Patient A, with the initial WBC count so high, why he did not see the patient? MD stated he wanted to repeat the WBC's. MD 1 acknowledged the "ED called back about 4 hours later. Got the Ultrasound and WBC and the D&C (a surgical procedure to clean out the uterus) was done about 4-5 hours after admission." On 5/14/15, at 3:10 p.m., a phone interview was conducted with the PA. The PA stated that with Patient A's blood pressure being low and her pulse being high she was concerned about getting fluids into the patient then doing the physical exam and possibly utilizing antibiotics. The PA said she conferred with the ED MD and after getting the initial blood work back with the high WBCs she paged MD 1 at 2:50 p.m. The PA informed the OB about getting fluids into the patient and "he wanted to know about the band count" (bands are immature WBC's count and can indicate impending infection. Norm is 0-5, Patient A's bands were 13 on the first count at 1:30 p.m. and 9 on the second count at 5 p.m.). The PA stated she did not recall what the MD 1's issues were with the white count and why he wanted it to be redone, "He [MD 1] didn't want to admit her to the hospital until the band count was rechecked." When the PA was asked about how long it was between the first contact with the OB and when he came to see the patient she stated "hours." The PA further stated "after the initial contact and care went on I tried to page him (MD 1) again, more than 3 times without a response. I waited about 10-15 minutes between pages. Generally we wait about 15 minutes for a call back." In review of the Medical Staff Bylaws, Rules and Regulations, dated 3/12/13, there was no reference to the use of or roles of on call physicians who are used for consults. There was no definition of what a reasonable amount of time for response would be. The Deputy Director of Standards and Compliance (DDSC), in an interview on 5/7/15 at 10 a.m., acknowledged a facility investigation had been conducted and there were needs identified to address the on call physician response time to an Emergent Medical Condition. The DDSC, in an interview on 6/9/15, stated there were no policies and procedures written to define the responsibilities of the on call physician to respond, examine and treat patients with an Emergency Medical Condition.

See Less ↑
Notes

“Average time” refers to the median wait time (the midpoint of all patients' wait times). References to “doctor or medical practitioner” indicate a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. CMS reports the CT scan quality measure as the percentage of patients who received a scan within 45 minutes. We have reversed that measure so that all measures follow a “lower is better” pattern.

Additional design and development by Mike Tigas and Sisi Wei.

Sources

All data comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Detailed quality measures at the hospital, state and national level were last updated September 2019. Most data was collected between October 2017 and October 2018. Data on ER-related violations is from January 2015 to June 2019.

Additional Info

How We've Updated ER Inspector | Download ProPublica's Emergency Room Planning Toolkit | About This Data

Don’t See Your ER?

In some cases we aren’t able to identify the exact location of a hospital, so it doesn’t appear on our mapped search results. However, it may still be in our database – try looking for it in the list of hospitals on each state's page.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from our database because it doesn't have an emergency department.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from the federal government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data. There are a couple of reasons why a hospital isn’t included in CMS data: it may not participate in Medicare, or it may share a certification number with another hospital (common across large hospital systems).

If you notice a hospital missing from our database, please first check if you can find it on CMS' website, and that it is listed as having an ER. If so, please email us with the hospital name and address.