ER Inspector SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTERSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER

ER Inspector

Find and Evaluate Every Emergency Room Near You

Updated September 19, 2019

This database was last updated in September 2019. It should only be used as a historical snapshot.Researchers can find more recent data on timely and effective care in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospitals datasets and guidance about hospital regulations.

If you are having a heart attack or life-threatening emergency, call 911.

ER Inspector » Colorado » SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER

Don’t see your ER? Find out why it might be missing.

SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER

501 e hampden avenue, englewood, Colo. 80113

(303) 788-5000

77% of Patients Would "Definitely Recommend" this Hospital
(Colo. Avg: 75%)

1 violation related to ER care since 2015

Hospital Type

Acute Care Hospitals

Hospital Owner

Proprietary

ER Volume

Very high (60K+ patients a year)

See this hospital's CMS profile page or inspection reports.

Patient Pathways Through This ER

After a patient arrives at the emergency room, they are typically seen by a doctor or medical practitioner and then either sent home or admitted to the hospital and taken to a room. A small percentage of patients leave without being seen. The chart below shows on average how long each of these pathways take. Lower numbers are better, and all times refer to the average length of time people waited.

Arrives at ER
0% of patients leave without being seen
3hrs 28min Admitted to hospital
5hrs 6min Taken to room
2hrs 2min Sent home

All wait times are average.

Detailed Quality Measures

Here is a more in depth look at each quality measure, compared to state and national averages for hospitals with very high ER volumes. Experts caution that very small differences between hospitals for a given measure are unlikely to correspond to noticeable differences in the real world.

Measure
Average for this Hospital
How this Hospital Compares

(to other hospitals with similar
ER volumes, when available)

Discharged Patients
Time Until Sent Home

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being sent home (if not admitted).

2hrs 2min
National Avg.
2hrs 50min
Colo. Avg.
2hrs 17min
This Hospital
2hrs 2min
Impatient Patients
Left Without
Being Seen

Percentage of patients who left the emergency room without being seen by a doctor or medical practitioner.

0%
Avg. U.S. Hospital
2%
Avg. Colo. Hospital
1%
This Hospital
0%
Admitted Patients
Time Before Admission

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being admitted to the hospital.

3hrs 28min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
5hrs 33min
Colo. Avg.
4hrs 4min
This Hospital
3hrs 28min
Admitted Patients
Transfer Time

Among patients admitted, additional time they spent waiting before being taken to their room (sometimes referred to as "boarding time.")

1hr 38min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
2hrs 24min
Colo. Avg.
1hr 42min
This Hospital
1hr 38min
Special Patients
CT Scan

Percentage of patients who arrived with stroke symptoms and did not receive brain scan results within 45 mins.

No Data Available

The number of cases/patients is too few to report.

National Avg.
27%
Colo. Avg.
33%
This Hospital
No Data Available

Violations Related to ER Care

Problems found in emergency rooms at this hospital since 2015, as identified during the investigation of a complaint. About This Data →

Violation
Full Text
INTEGRATION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES

Sep 22, 2016

Based on interviews and document reviews the facility failed to integrate support services and assess discharge readiness to ensure a safe transition of care from the emergency room in 3 out of 20 patients (Patients #1, #5 and #13).

See More ↓

Based on interviews and document reviews the facility failed to integrate support services and assess discharge readiness to ensure a safe transition of care from the emergency room in 3 out of 20 patients (Patients #1, #5 and #13). This failure created the potential for patients with ongoing medical conditions to be discharged to inappropriate environments without the ability to manage medical conditions due to lack of services, equipment, and resources. POLICY According to Guidelines for Nursing Care of the Emergency Department (ED) Patient, the plan of care will be individualized and based on patient needs or condition, the plan will be developed through collaboration among members of the health care team and the patient, documentation will reflect the standard of care specific to the patient's presenting problem. Documentation will include ongoing assessment, reassessment and evaluation. Care/focused assessment and vital signs of the patient will be documented a minimum of every 2 hours based on patient's clinical condition. Vital signs will be reassessed within thirty (30) minutes prior to discharge, excluding non-urgent patients with normal vital signs at presentation. All finding from nursing assessment and reassessment will be documented. In addition to ED nursing care, ancillary services such a social service, chaplain, psychiatric services, and home health care will be provided when indicated. At patient's discharge assure the patient is capable of self-care or has access to support services. Arrangement for home health care may be initiated by the ED Case Manager or the patient's primary nurse. The patient will be assessed for readiness to will which will include cognitive understanding. Documentation will indicate patient condition and aftercare instructions provided to the patient and/or family prior to discharge. 1. The facility failed to provide post-discharge resources to Patient #1 to ensure a safe discharge and transition from the emergency room to home/self-care. a) A review of Patient #1's medical record revealed s/he presented to the Emergency Department (ED), on 06/27/16, on 3 liters (L) oxygen (O2) via nasal cannula (NC) upon arrival by ambulance. It was noted in Patient #1's medical record s/he suffered from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lived in a skilled nursing facility. At 06/28/16 at 1:57 p.m. the medical record revealed Case Manager #1 had reported the nursing home did not want the patient to return there to live. The family was to be notified and they could arrange for placement. Case Manager #1 documentation on 06/28/16 at 4:57 p.m., revealed disposition to an acute living facility was discussed with the brother and a senior blue book was provided as a community resource. However, the patient was discharged home in the care of his/her brother. No additional post-discharge resources were noted as provided or discussed with the patient to ensure a safe transition home. There was no documentation the patient was set up with home oxygen services prior to discharge. Patient #1 was discharged at 6:30 p.m. on 06/28/16. b) During an interview on 09/21/16 at 9:18 a.m., Case Manager #4 stated part of his/her job included assisting patients with transfers to hospice, home health set up, resources regarding addictions and follow-up services. S/he would also assist with transfers to Skilled Nursing Facilities. The case managers worked with families and provided a list of facilities. Patients would stay in the ED until placement was made and until the facility could ensure the environment the patients were going to was safe for them. S/he assumed a patient would stay in the ED if a discharge home was not safe for them. S/he further stated the facility needed to ensure a safe plan for the patient. c) During an interview with Case Manager #1 on 09/22/16 at 11:20 a.m., s/he stated the case manager position was a lot of self-discovery, it was his/her responsibility to decide if an emergency room patient needed case management services. Case Manager #1 did not have a checklist or flowsheet to determine patient needs to get home from the ED safely. Case Manager #1 admitted patients in need of his/her services in the emergency room could "most definitely" be missed with the current process. During the same interview on 09/22/16 at 11:20 a.m. Case Manager #1 reviewed the medical record of Patient #1. S/he stated Patient #1's medical needs were not discussed with the long term facility from which Patient #1 was brought. Case Manager #1 was unaware and did not question if the patient needed medical equipment or services for a safe discharge home with family. Case Manager #1 stated medical equipment was typically something families and patients needed to figure out on their own. S/he further stated s/he did not have a discharge plan in place for Patient #1. d) During an interview on 09/22/16 at 1:32 p.m., The Director of Case Management (Director #2) stated s/he expected the ED case managers to assess the patient's physical and medical needs. The case manager needed to determine if a patient needed home health at time of discharge. Director #2 expected to see this documented in the medical record. Upon review of Patient #1's medical record during the interview, Director #2 stated s/he expected to see documentation of the other facility being notified and medical equipment and supplies reviewed. S/he further stated more information was needed in the medical record to determine if Patient #1's discharge to home was safe. 2. The facility failed to assess patient's vital signs and O2 saturation levels within 30 minutes prior to discharge pursuant to the policy. a) A review of Patient #1's medical record revealed s/he presented on 3L O2 via NC upon arrival by ambulance. It was noted in Patient #1's medical record s/he suffered from COPD and lived in a skilled nursing facility. Respiratory assessments per the emergency department revealed Patient #1 had an oxygen saturation of 97% with administered O2 on 06/27/16 at 10:31 p.m. during his/her initial ER assessment. Further documentation review revealed the patient remained on O2 with documentation of O2 saturation levels through 06/28/16 at 8:48 a.m. On 06/28/16 at 12:19 p.m. documentation revealed Patient #1's oxygen saturation was 94%, it was not documented if the patient was on room air or remained on O2. No further vital signs for oxygen saturations were recorded for the patient and a room air oxygen saturation was not recorded. There was no documentation respiratory therapy was notified regarding a COPD patient on O2. Patient #1 was discharged to home from the ED at 6:30 p.m. on 06/28/16. b) A review of Patient #5's medical record revealed s/he was discharged at 4:22 p.m. on 07/14/16. The last set of vital signs assessed for patient #5 was at 3:10 p.m. on 07/14/16. This was not in accordance with facility policy regarding the timeframe of patient assessment prior to discharge. A review of Patient #13's medical record revealed his/her vital signs were taken at 5:49 p.m. on 09/07/16. The next set of vital signs were recorded at 10:05 p.m. This was outside the facility policy timeframe of 2 hours to assess the vital signs of an emergency room patient. c) During an interview on 09/22/16 at 12:19 p.m., RN #5 stated if a patient was on oxygen a room air saturation must be charted as well. A room air saturation was not documented on Patient #1's chart. S/he stated vital signs and assessments of an emergency department patient should follow the policy. RN #5 further stated it was the case manager's responsibility to ensure the patient's discharge was safe. S/he stated patients were able to stay overnight in the emergency department if a safe place to discharge was not determined. d) During an interview with Vice President of Emergency Services (VP) # 3 on 09/22/16 at 2:16 p.m., s/he stated s/he would expect to see a set of vital signs and a physical assessment of patients at discharge. S/he was unsure if a room air challenge was needed on patient's receiving oxygen while in the Emergency Department. VP #3 stated the Department relied on family to know the needs of the patient. S/he further stated that the facility did not get involved with medical equipment for a patient if it was after business hours.

See Less ↑
Notes

“Average time” refers to the median wait time (the midpoint of all patients' wait times). References to “doctor or medical practitioner” indicate a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. CMS reports the CT scan quality measure as the percentage of patients who received a scan within 45 minutes. We have reversed that measure so that all measures follow a “lower is better” pattern.

Additional design and development by Mike Tigas and Sisi Wei.

Sources

All data comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Detailed quality measures at the hospital, state and national level were last updated September 2019. Most data was collected between October 2017 and October 2018. Data on ER-related violations is from January 2015 to June 2019.

Additional Info

How We've Updated ER Inspector | Download ProPublica's Emergency Room Planning Toolkit | About This Data

Don’t See Your ER?

In some cases we aren’t able to identify the exact location of a hospital, so it doesn’t appear on our mapped search results. However, it may still be in our database – try looking for it in the list of hospitals on each state's page.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from our database because it doesn't have an emergency department.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from the federal government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data. There are a couple of reasons why a hospital isn’t included in CMS data: it may not participate in Medicare, or it may share a certification number with another hospital (common across large hospital systems).

If you notice a hospital missing from our database, please first check if you can find it on CMS' website, and that it is listed as having an ER. If so, please email us with the hospital name and address.