ER Inspector MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTERMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER

ER Inspector

Find and Evaluate Every Emergency Room Near You

Updated September 19, 2019

This database was last updated in September 2019. It should only be used as a historical snapshot.Researchers can find more recent data on timely and effective care in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospitals datasets and guidance about hospital regulations.

If you are having a heart attack or life-threatening emergency, call 911.

ER Inspector » Florida » MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER

Don’t see your ER? Find out why it might be missing.

MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER

4300 alton rd, miami beach, Fla. 33140

(305) 674-2121

72% of Patients Would "Definitely Recommend" this Hospital
(Fla. Avg: 69%)

2 violations related to ER care since 2015

Hospital Type

Acute Care Hospitals

Hospital Owner

Proprietary

ER Volume

Very high (60K+ patients a year)

See this hospital's CMS profile page or inspection reports.

Patient Pathways Through This ER

After a patient arrives at the emergency room, they are typically seen by a doctor or medical practitioner and then either sent home or admitted to the hospital and taken to a room. A small percentage of patients leave without being seen. The chart below shows on average how long each of these pathways take. Lower numbers are better, and all times refer to the average length of time people waited.

Arrives at ER
1% of patients leave without being seen
5hrs 18min Admitted to hospital
7hrs 11min Taken to room
2hrs 27min Sent home

All wait times are average.

Detailed Quality Measures

Here is a more in depth look at each quality measure, compared to state and national averages for hospitals with very high ER volumes. Experts caution that very small differences between hospitals for a given measure are unlikely to correspond to noticeable differences in the real world.

Measure
Average for this Hospital
How this Hospital Compares

(to other hospitals with similar
ER volumes, when available)

Discharged Patients
Time Until Sent Home

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being sent home (if not admitted).

2hrs 27min
National Avg.
2hrs 50min
Fla. Avg.
2hrs 31min
This Hospital
2hrs 27min
Impatient Patients
Left Without
Being Seen

Percentage of patients who left the emergency room without being seen by a doctor or medical practitioner.

1%
Avg. U.S. Hospital
2%
Avg. Fla. Hospital
1%
This Hospital
1%
Admitted Patients
Time Before Admission

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being admitted to the hospital.

5hrs 18min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
5hrs 33min
Fla. Avg.
5hrs 12min
This Hospital
5hrs 18min
Admitted Patients
Transfer Time

Among patients admitted, additional time they spent waiting before being taken to their room (sometimes referred to as "boarding time.")

1hr 53min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
2hrs 24min
Fla. Avg.
2hrs 10min
This Hospital
1hr 53min
Special Patients
CT Scan

Percentage of patients who arrived with stroke symptoms and did not receive brain scan results within 45 mins.

No Data Available

The number of cases/patients is too few to report.

National Avg.
27%
Fla. Avg.
26%
This Hospital
No Data Available

Violations Related to ER Care

Problems found in emergency rooms at this hospital since 2015, as identified during the investigation of a complaint. About This Data →

Violation
Full Text
COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24

Apr 2, 2015

Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide General and Orthopedic services within its capability prior to the transfer of one (Sampled Patient, SP #1) of twenty-two sampled patients.

See More ↓

Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide General and Orthopedic services within its capability prior to the transfer of one (Sampled Patient, SP #1) of twenty-two sampled patients. SP #1 was transferred from Hospital #1 and the facility had the capability to provide the services needed by SP #1. Refer to the findings at A 2409. Review of facility's documents on 4/2/15 showed the following corrective action plan: all ED physicians and ED nursing staff will be educated on Medical Screening and Duties of the On-call Physician policies, and sign-in sheet will be collected. Target completion date was 03/13/15. The involved On call physician would receive verbal education regarding the duties of the on call physician and that patients cannot be transferred outside the hospital's service capability. Target completion date was 03/09/15. Duties of on call physician has been placed on the agenda for the upcoming Medical Executive Committee, target date 03/13/15. Quality monitoring to include review of the transfer log of 100% of transfers, for four months. Review of Physician sign-in sheet for Medical Screening and Duties of the On-call Physician education showed that two ED physicians did not receive education as of 04/02/15. On 04/02/15 at 2:30PM, the Quality Manager stated that the Duties of on call physicians was not placed on the agenda for the Medical Executive Committee for April 2015 and will be placed on the next agenda. On 04/02/15 at 3:45PM, the Director of Accreditation and Certification Services stated that all other corrective actions were completed. Review of facility's record showed that the other corrective actions were completed.

See Less ↑
APPROPRIATE TRANSFER

Apr 2, 2015

Based on reviews of medical records, policies and procedures, facility licenses, and interviews, the facility failed to provide General and Orthopedic services within its capability prior to the transfer of one (Sampled Patient, SP #1) of twenty-two sampled patients.

See More ↓

Based on reviews of medical records, policies and procedures, facility licenses, and interviews, the facility failed to provide General and Orthopedic services within its capability prior to the transfer of one (Sampled Patient, SP #1) of twenty-two sampled patients. SP #1 was transferred from Hospital #1 and the facility had the capability to provide the services needed by SP #1. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, "Hospital to Hospital Transfer Policy," dated 10/04, documented in part, " Mount Sinai Medical Center is a full service hospital providing all acute care needs with the exception of pediatrics, burn patients, trauma patients and transplant services ...Definitions: A. Appropriate Transfer: ... (1) the transferring hospital provides medical treatment within its capacity that minimizes the risks to the individual ' s health. " Review of the facility's policy, "Medical Screening Policy," documents, the capabilities of the facility's staff mean the level of care that the hospital's personnel can provide within the training and scope of their professional licenses. Review of the facility's license showed the facility provides general surgery, plastic surgery, and orthopedics services. Review of SP#1 medical record showed that he arrived to the ED (emergency department) on 01/31/15 at 1:53 PM. According to the ED notes, the patient's chief complaint was abdominal pain with 2 days of emesis and diarrhea. The consultation notes on 01/31/2015 documented, SP #1 had an approximate 7 day history of right shoulder pain and [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] (redness) of the right shoulder in the subscapular region. He was previously seen at the ED where he underwent a brief evaluation and was discharged home. The ED provider notes dated 01/31/15 at 2:59 PM document, the patient presented with right shoulder pain and swelling. Patient stated pain started two to three days ago localized to right shoulder, radiates distally to right hand and medially to right chest wall, described as swollen and red. Physician evaluation of the patient's right shoulder showed right shoulder was positive for swelling and edema that extends distally to the distal ends of the right hand involving the finger tips and radiates medially to the proximal shoulder and involves the right lateral chest wall and right lateral flank of the abdomen, positive for 2+ (plus) pitting edema with warmth and [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] on palpation. The Computed Tomography (CT) scan of the right upper extremity results on 01/31/15 at 7:15 PM showed an ill-defined 8.4 x 3.8 cm gas and fluid collection at the right sub-scapularis muscle with extension to the right of the rotator cuff. There was also extension of fluid through the right axillary space, right upper shoulder and throughout the fascial planes of the right arm and lateral chest wall. There was extensive soft tissue swelling throughout the right shoulder joint as well as diffusely throughout the medial aspect of the right arm, right axilla, right thorax, and right flank extending to the level of the iliac. There was no fracture or suspicious osseous lesion. The CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis findings was sub-scapularis muscle concerning for myositis (muscle inflammation) with possible [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] (fast acting flesh eating bacteria). The plastic surgeon consultation report on 01/31/15 documented, the plan was to await an orthopedic surgery evaluation for possible irrigation, debridement, and washout of the shoulder and upper extremity fluid collection. General surgery will be involved as well, in case there is additional debridement needed to the chest wall. In addition, the patient has early multi-organ system failure (shut down of multiple body systems in face of uncontrolled sepsis) associated with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. The Orthopedic Consultation notes on 01/31/15 documented, the patient has severe sepsis (refers to a bacterial infection in the bloodstream or body tissues) with aggressive septicemia with possible [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] involving retro-scapular, sub-scapula, right shoulder and upper extremity as well as frank [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. The recommendation was that the patient required a highly specialized upper extremity surgeon evaluation for which recommendation was made to transfer to Hospital #2. The services required at the present time were not available in the institution. On 1/31/15 at 8:26 PM, hospital #1 documented two physicians attempted to tap the right shoulder joint, but were unsuccessful, no fluid was aspirated. An Arthrocentesis was attempted. Only a scant amount of blood tinged fluid was obtained. Review of the transfer form showed that the patient was transferred to (Hospital #2) on 01/31/15 at 10:30PM. The documented reason the transfer was required was medical services not available. The accepting physician was Dr. [named]. The consent for transfer was signed by the patient. On 1/31/15 at 11:16 PM, the patient was transferred to hospital #2. The vital signs on 1/31/15 were documented as 122/68, 94% on room air, 98.5 Fahrenheit. Review of the SP #1 medical record from hospital #2 showed the patient (MDS) dated [DATE] with an illness since 1/23/2015 per mother with the patient experiencing shoulder pain. According to the operative reports, the patient underwent multiple procedures: an incision and drainage of the subscapular abscess and debridement of necrotic tissue on 02/05/2015; a washout and debridement of skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle, and fascia from right side back subscapula space and chest on 02/06/2015; a wash out and debridement including the back, subscapular axilla and post pectoral region of the wound on 02/10/2015; a wound debridement, washout, and wound VAC placement on 02/13/2015 and 02/16/2015;and an incision and debridement of a right shoulder wound , removal of wound VAC management system on 02/19/2015; and an incision and drainage of right arm abscess and replacement of right chest wall back dressing on 02/28/2015. On 02/18/15 at 1:35 PM, during the emergency access review, hospital #1's Chairman of the ED stated, SP#1 came into the ED with swelling. He stated that that there were concerns for [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] and shoulder infection. He stated that the orthopedic surgeon said that they could not handle the case. He stated the ED physicians thought that SP#1 had trauma that got infected. He also stated that the physicians were not comfortable providing treatment to the patient for fear that they did not want to mess up the patient's arm which could lead to amputation. He stated that [named] Center at hospital #2 was contacted and the patient was accepted. He stated that [DIAGNOSES REDACTED] is a fast acting flesh eating bacteria. On 02/18/15 at 2:00 PM, during the emergency access review, the Orthopedic Surgeon stated that SP#1 had an aspiration done and was seen by the general surgeon. He stated that the patient had cellulitis (a common skin infection) in the scapula, shoulder, right thorax, rib cage, ribs, and right leg and needed aggressive intervention and treatment immediately. He stated that there was nothing that he could do as an orthopedic surgeon because the patient did not have any bones broken or out of place. He stated that he could not handle the patient and felt that the patient was best managed elsewhere. He stated that based on his level of expertise, he could not do the arm and chest. He stated that the patient' s condition was beyond his scope of orthopedic practice. He stated that he did not have any experience with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. On 02/18/15 at 2:57 PM, during the emergency access review, General Surgeon #2 stated that not all general surgeons are trained and have the expertise to handle [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. He stated that if the surgeon did not have the expertise, the patient needed to be transferred immediately. The facility had capability (specialty services, Orthopedics and General surgery) and capacity to care for SP#1 on 1/31/2015. The facility inappropriately transferred SP #1 on 1/31/2015 based on the recommendation of the orthopedist without providing an evaluation of the patient prior to transfer.

See Less ↑
Notes

“Average time” refers to the median wait time (the midpoint of all patients' wait times). References to “doctor or medical practitioner” indicate a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. CMS reports the CT scan quality measure as the percentage of patients who received a scan within 45 minutes. We have reversed that measure so that all measures follow a “lower is better” pattern.

Additional design and development by Mike Tigas and Sisi Wei.

Sources

All data comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Detailed quality measures at the hospital, state and national level were last updated September 2019. Most data was collected between October 2017 and October 2018. Data on ER-related violations is from January 2015 to June 2019.

Additional Info

How We've Updated ER Inspector | Download ProPublica's Emergency Room Planning Toolkit | About This Data

Don’t See Your ER?

In some cases we aren’t able to identify the exact location of a hospital, so it doesn’t appear on our mapped search results. However, it may still be in our database – try looking for it in the list of hospitals on each state's page.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from our database because it doesn't have an emergency department.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from the federal government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data. There are a couple of reasons why a hospital isn’t included in CMS data: it may not participate in Medicare, or it may share a certification number with another hospital (common across large hospital systems).

If you notice a hospital missing from our database, please first check if you can find it on CMS' website, and that it is listed as having an ER. If so, please email us with the hospital name and address.