ER Inspector MARTIN MEDICAL CENTERMARTIN MEDICAL CENTER

ER Inspector

Find and Evaluate Every Emergency Room Near You

Updated September 19, 2019

This database was last updated in September 2019. It should only be used as a historical snapshot.Researchers can find more recent data on timely and effective care in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospitals datasets and guidance about hospital regulations.

If you are having a heart attack or life-threatening emergency, call 911.

ER Inspector » Florida » MARTIN MEDICAL CENTER

Don’t see your ER? Find out why it might be missing.

MARTIN MEDICAL CENTER

200 se hospital ave, stuart, Fla. 34995

(772) 287-5200

72% of Patients Would "Definitely Recommend" this Hospital
(Fla. Avg: 69%)

4 violations related to ER care since 2015

Hospital Type

Acute Care Hospitals

Hospital Owner

Voluntary non-profit - Private

ER Volume

Very high (60K+ patients a year)

See this hospital's CMS profile page or inspection reports.

Patient Pathways Through This ER

After a patient arrives at the emergency room, they are typically seen by a doctor or medical practitioner and then either sent home or admitted to the hospital and taken to a room. A small percentage of patients leave without being seen. The chart below shows on average how long each of these pathways take. Lower numbers are better, and all times refer to the average length of time people waited.

Arrives at ER
1% of patients leave without being seen
5hrs 58min Admitted to hospital
10hrs 25min Taken to room
2hrs 36min Sent home

All wait times are average.

Detailed Quality Measures

Here is a more in depth look at each quality measure, compared to state and national averages for hospitals with very high ER volumes. Experts caution that very small differences between hospitals for a given measure are unlikely to correspond to noticeable differences in the real world.

Measure
Average for this Hospital
How this Hospital Compares

(to other hospitals with similar
ER volumes, when available)

Discharged Patients
Time Until Sent Home

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being sent home (if not admitted).

2hrs 36min
National Avg.
2hrs 50min
Fla. Avg.
2hrs 31min
This Hospital
2hrs 36min
Impatient Patients
Left Without
Being Seen

Percentage of patients who left the emergency room without being seen by a doctor or medical practitioner.

1%
Avg. U.S. Hospital
2%
Avg. Fla. Hospital
1%
This Hospital
1%
Admitted Patients
Time Before Admission

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being admitted to the hospital.

5hrs 58min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
5hrs 33min
Fla. Avg.
5hrs 12min
This Hospital
5hrs 58min
Admitted Patients
Transfer Time

Among patients admitted, additional time they spent waiting before being taken to their room (sometimes referred to as "boarding time.")

4hrs 27min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
2hrs 24min
Fla. Avg.
2hrs 10min
This Hospital
4hrs 27min
Special Patients
CT Scan

Percentage of patients who arrived with stroke symptoms and did not receive brain scan results within 45 mins.

28%
National Avg.
27%
Fla. Avg.
26%
This Hospital
28%

Violations Related to ER Care

Problems found in emergency rooms at this hospital since 2015, as identified during the investigation of a complaint. About This Data →

Violation
Full Text
COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24

Mar 2, 2015

Based on facility policy and clinical record reviews and interviews the facility failed to provide evidence of an appropriate transfer to include documentation of the provision of treatment to minimize risk of deterioration, written physician certification of the risk and benefit of transfer and contact with and acceptance of the patient by the receiving facility for 1 of 26 sampled patients (Patient # 26).

See More ↓

Based on facility policy and clinical record reviews and interviews the facility failed to provide evidence of an appropriate transfer to include documentation of the provision of treatment to minimize risk of deterioration, written physician certification of the risk and benefit of transfer and contact with and acceptance of the patient by the receiving facility for 1 of 26 sampled patients (Patient # 26). Refer to findings in tag A-2409.

See Less ↑
HOSPITAL MUST MAINTAIN RECORDS

Mar 2, 2015

Based on reviews of medical records and policy and procedures and interviews the facility failed to ensure medical records and other related records were maintained for 1 of 26 sampled patients (Patient # 26) that presented to the hospital seeking medical assistance. The findings include: The facility ' s policy titled " Martin Medical Center ...Department of Nursing " Reviewed/Revised 10/13, revealed in part, " Procedure: To ensure continuity and consistency in Nursing Documentation for permanent patient record.

See More ↓

Based on reviews of medical records and policy and procedures and interviews the facility failed to ensure medical records and other related records were maintained for 1 of 26 sampled patients (Patient # 26) that presented to the hospital seeking medical assistance. The findings include: The facility ' s policy titled " Martin Medical Center ...Department of Nursing " Reviewed/Revised 10/13, revealed in part, " Procedure: To ensure continuity and consistency in Nursing Documentation for permanent patient record. Standard: Every patient evaluated and treated in the Emergency Department will have computerized nursing documentation which includes triage assessment, vital signs, medication, allergies treatments and discharge assessment ... triage Nurse ...An initial triage assessment will be made including chief complaint ...Primary Nurse: Ascertain information regarding history of illness or injury and add pertinent information to medical record. " The medical record for Patient #26 dated 2/7/2015 obtained from facility B (an acute care hospital/trauma center) was reviewed on 2/27/2015. Review of the medical record indicated in part " [AGE] year-old (Pt #26) presents emergency department, via trauma hawk. Per paramedic patient was picked up outside at Martin hospital ... by boyfriend, allegedly patient jumped out of a moving vehicle. Sustained closed head injury. Patient intubated in the field by paramedics. " Interview with The Director of The Emergency Department (ED) conducted on 02/27/15 at 11:30 AM confirms Patient # 26 did not have a medical record at the facility. Phone interview with The Clinical Coordinator conducted on 02/27/15 at 12:03 PM revealed her recollection of an incident on 02/06/15 as, Patient (#26) was brought to the ED by her boyfriend; the patient's vehicle was parked at the ambulance bay and the boyfriend came in requesting help for the patient. The staff including a physician and herself went went out to help. The nurse confirmed no medical record was created for Patient # 26. The facility failed to ensure that their policy was followed as evidenced by failing to ensure that on 2/7/2015 a medical record was maintained for Patient #26 when he/she presented to the ED .

See Less ↑
EMERGENCY ROOM LOG

Mar 2, 2015

Based on review of the Emergency Department (ED) Log and interview the hospital failed to maintain a central log on each individual who comes to the emergency department seeking assistance and whether he or she refused treatment, was refused treatment, or whether he or she was transferred, admitted and treated, stabilized and transferred, or discharged for 1 (#26) of 26 sampled patients.

See More ↓

Based on review of the Emergency Department (ED) Log and interview the hospital failed to maintain a central log on each individual who comes to the emergency department seeking assistance and whether he or she refused treatment, was refused treatment, or whether he or she was transferred, admitted and treated, stabilized and transferred, or discharged for 1 (#26) of 26 sampled patients. The findings include: Review of the ED Log dated 2/1/2015 through 2/13/2015 revealed no documentation that Patient #26 was entered in the ED log. Interview with the Director of the Emergency Department conducted on 02/27/2015 at 11:30 A.M., confirmed Patient #26 was not listed on the emergency room log on 2/7/2015.

See Less ↑
APPROPRIATE TRANSFER

Mar 2, 2015

Based on facility policy and clinical record reviews and interviews the facility failed to provide evidence of an appropriate transfer to include documentation of the provision of treatment to minimize risk of deterioration, written physician certification of the risk and benefit of transfer and contact with and acceptance of the patient by the receiving facility for 1 of 26 sampled patients (Patient # 26). The findings include: Review on 2/27/15 of the clinical records obtained from facility B (an acute care hospital/trauma center) dated 02/06/15 indicates Patient # 26 presented to the Martin Medical Center emergency department (ED) and emergency services were requested on her behalf.

See More ↓

Based on facility policy and clinical record reviews and interviews the facility failed to provide evidence of an appropriate transfer to include documentation of the provision of treatment to minimize risk of deterioration, written physician certification of the risk and benefit of transfer and contact with and acceptance of the patient by the receiving facility for 1 of 26 sampled patients (Patient # 26). The findings include: Review on 2/27/15 of the clinical records obtained from facility B (an acute care hospital/trauma center) dated 02/06/15 indicates Patient # 26 presented to the Martin Medical Center emergency department (ED) and emergency services were requested on her behalf. Patient # 26 was subsequently transferred to facility B. Interview with The Director of the Emergency Department (ED) conducted on 02/27/15 at 11:30 AM revealed the facility was unable to provide any supportive evidence verifying compliance with the transfer requirement at 489 (e) (2). A transfer to another medical facility is appropriate when the transferring facility provides treatment to minimize risk of deterioration; the receiving facility has available space and qualified personal to treat the patient being transferred; the receiving facility has agreed to receive the transfer and provide medical treatment and the transferring facility sends to the receiving facility all medical records. Refer to citation A 2403 in this report. Furthermore, the facility protocol to be followed to execute a transfer was not implemented. Phone interview with The Physician, who was on duty the night of the incident, conducted on 02/27/15 at 12:39 PM revealed Patient # 26 presented to the facility after falling form a moving vehicle; The EMS (emergency medical system) personnel was called to assist in removing the patient from the vehicle, the patient was argumentative and intoxicated. EMS made the decision to transfer the patient to the trauma center based on the patient's injuries. The EMS has protocols to follow when trauma cases occurred and they assumed care of the patient. The physician was not able to provide supportive evidence for an appropriate transfer and did not recall if the receiving facility was contacted prior to the transfer. Interview with The ED Medical Director conducted on 03/02/15 at 12 PM revealed the patient presented on hospital property. He stated the cleanest way to handle this situation would have been to document the screening exam, stabilization of the patient and contacting the receiving facility to advise the patient was being transferred; all these steps may have delayed the transfer, but that is the facility protocol. The facility was not able to provide evidence the physician has signed a certification or other documentation that, based upon the information available at the time of transfer, the medical benefits reasonably expected from the provision of appropriate medical treatment at another medical facility outweigh the increased risks to the individual from being transferred. There is no certification by the physician or qualified medical professional containing a summary of the risks and benefits upon which it is based. The facility has no evidence the receiving facility received pertinent medical records related to the emergency condition which the individual has presented with that are available at the time of the transfer, including available history, records related to the individual's emergency medical condition, observations of signs or symptoms, preliminary diagnosis, results of diagnostic studies or telephone reports of the studies, treatment provided, results of any tests and the informed written consent or certification. Facility policy for Emergent Transfer of Patients To An Acute Care Facility documents The Emergency Physician initiates transfers for patients requiring services that are not provided or available. Discusses transfers with patient/family and obtains consent. Writes transfer orders and notifies transfer center. Complete and signs physician certification: In electronic medical record under EMTALA transfer Documentation in section 1: Physician Certification. Notifies nursing supervisor prior to contacting receiving facilities. The transfer center, charge nurse or nursing supervisor initiates the call to potential receiving facilities using call log list. Documents all calls listing reasons given for declining the transfer. The charge nurse, transfer center and nursing supervisor prepares and reviews consent forms; arrange appropriate transportation; completes inter hospital transfer summary and nurse certification from the electronic record and send as copy to the receiving facility.

See Less ↑
Notes

“Average time” refers to the median wait time (the midpoint of all patients' wait times). References to “doctor or medical practitioner” indicate a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. CMS reports the CT scan quality measure as the percentage of patients who received a scan within 45 minutes. We have reversed that measure so that all measures follow a “lower is better” pattern.

Additional design and development by Mike Tigas and Sisi Wei.

Sources

All data comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Detailed quality measures at the hospital, state and national level were last updated September 2019. Most data was collected between October 2017 and October 2018. Data on ER-related violations is from January 2015 to June 2019.

Additional Info

How We've Updated ER Inspector | Download ProPublica's Emergency Room Planning Toolkit | About This Data

Don’t See Your ER?

In some cases we aren’t able to identify the exact location of a hospital, so it doesn’t appear on our mapped search results. However, it may still be in our database – try looking for it in the list of hospitals on each state's page.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from our database because it doesn't have an emergency department.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from the federal government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data. There are a couple of reasons why a hospital isn’t included in CMS data: it may not participate in Medicare, or it may share a certification number with another hospital (common across large hospital systems).

If you notice a hospital missing from our database, please first check if you can find it on CMS' website, and that it is listed as having an ER. If so, please email us with the hospital name and address.