ER Inspector MADISON PARISH HOSPITALMADISON PARISH HOSPITAL

ER Inspector

Find and Evaluate Every Emergency Room Near You

Updated September 19, 2019

This database was last updated in September 2019. It should only be used as a historical snapshot.Researchers can find more recent data on timely and effective care in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospitals datasets and guidance about hospital regulations.

If you are having a heart attack or life-threatening emergency, call 911.

ER Inspector » Louisiana » MADISON PARISH HOSPITAL

Don’t see your ER? Find out why it might be missing.

MADISON PARISH HOSPITAL

900 johnson street, tallulah, La. 71282

(318) 574-2374

3 violations related to ER care since 2015

Hospital Type

Critical Access Hospitals

Hospital Owner

Government - Hospital District or Authority

See this hospital's CMS profile page or inspection reports.

Detailed Quality Measures

Here is a more in depth look at each quality measure, compared to state and national averages . Experts caution that very small differences between hospitals for a given measure are unlikely to correspond to noticeable differences in the real world.

This hospital has not reported any quality measures.

Violations Related to ER Care

Problems found in emergency rooms at this hospital since 2015, as identified during the investigation of a complaint. About This Data →

Violation
Full Text
COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24

Dec 9, 2015

Based on record review and interview, the hospital failed to ensure compliance with the requirements of CFR 489.24 as evidenced by: 1 Failing to have a central log since 8/1/15 on each individual who came to the emergency department seeking assistance and whether he or she refused treatment, was refused treatment, or whether he or she was transferred, admitted and treated, stabilized and transferred, or discharged ; (See findings at C-2405). 2) Failing to provide documented evidence to ensure that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner for 18 (#1, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20) of 20 (#1 - #20) patients who presented to the hospital's Emergency Department seeking treatment.

See More ↓

Based on record review and interview, the hospital failed to ensure compliance with the requirements of CFR 489.24 as evidenced by: 1 Failing to have a central log since 8/1/15 on each individual who came to the emergency department seeking assistance and whether he or she refused treatment, was refused treatment, or whether he or she was transferred, admitted and treated, stabilized and transferred, or discharged ; (See findings at C-2405). 2) Failing to provide documented evidence to ensure that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner for 18 (#1, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20) of 20 (#1 - #20) patients who presented to the hospital's Emergency Department seeking treatment. (See findings at C-2406).

See Less ↑
EMERGENCY ROOM LOG

Dec 9, 2015

Based on record review and interview, the hospital failed to have a central log since 8/1/15 on each individual who came to the emergency department seeking assistance and whether he or she refused treatment, was refused treatment, or whether he or she was transferred, admitted and treated, stabilized and transferred, or discharged . Findings: The emergency department log from 8/1/15 through present date was requested for review from S9AsstAdmin on 12/8/15 at 10:00 a.m.

See More ↓

Based on record review and interview, the hospital failed to have a central log since 8/1/15 on each individual who came to the emergency department seeking assistance and whether he or she refused treatment, was refused treatment, or whether he or she was transferred, admitted and treated, stabilized and transferred, or discharged . Findings: The emergency department log from 8/1/15 through present date was requested for review from S9AsstAdmin on 12/8/15 at 10:00 a.m. No log was presented by the hospital. In an interview on 12/8/15 at 1:37 p.m. with S9AsstAdmin, she verified there was no emergency department log since the new computer system was put into place at the beginning of August 2015. She said she could retrieve some of the data that was needed in a log from a billing section of the electronic record, but the true log information would have to be manually entered into the system and it had not been. She verified the report generated for billing did not include information required by the state of Louisiana for sex, mode of arrival, nature of complaint, and disposition of the patient. In an interview on 12/8/15 at 2:22 p.m. with S3ADON, she said she was unaware the emergency department did not have a log since August 2015. In an interview on 12/08/15 at 3:30 p.m. with S1CEO, he said he was not aware the emergency department did not have a log of patients since August 2015.

See Less ↑
MEDICAL SCREENING EXAM

Dec 9, 2015

Based on record review and interview, the hospital failed to provide documented evidence to ensure that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner for 18 (#1, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20) of 20 (#1 - #20) patients who presented to the hospital's Emergency Department seeking treatment.

See More ↓

Based on record review and interview, the hospital failed to provide documented evidence to ensure that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner for 18 (#1, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20) of 20 (#1 - #20) patients who presented to the hospital's Emergency Department seeking treatment. Findings: Patient #1 Review of Patient #1's medical record revealed she presented to the hospital's emergency department on 9/5/15 at 1:00 p.m. and was discharged on [DATE] at 4:46 p.m. Review of the nursing triage note revealed Patient #1's chief complaint was rectal bleeding. There was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner. Patient #4 Review of Patient #4's medical record revealed she presented to the hospital's emergency department on 9/9/15 at 8:42 p.m. and was discharged on [DATE] at 10:25 p.m. Review of the nursing triage note revealed Patient #4's chief complaint was a headache for 2 days. There was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner. Patient #5 Review of Patient #5's medical record revealed she presented to the hospital's emergency department on 8/13/15 at 6:46 p.m. and was discharged on [DATE] at 10:10 p.m. Review of the nursing triage note revealed Patient #5's chief complaint was pain over the entire body for 2 days. There was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner. Patient #6 Review of Patient #6's medical record revealed he presented to the hospital's emergency department on 9/23/15 at 5:22 p.m. and was discharged on [DATE] at 7:33 p.m. Review of the nursing triage note revealed Patient #6's chief complaint was pain to the right 5th digit and right wrist pain. There was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner. Patient #7 Review of Patient #7's medical record revealed he presented to the hospital's emergency department on 8/13/15 at 10:01 p.m. and was discharged on [DATE] at 1:40 a.m. Review of the nursing triage note revealed Patient #7's chief complaint was a laceration to the inside of the mouth. There was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner. Patient #8 Review of Patient #8's medical record revealed she presented to the hospital's emergency department on 9/10/15 at 2:45 a.m. and was discharged on [DATE] at 4:14 a.m. Review of the nursing triage note revealed Patient #8's chief complaint was constipation. There was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner. Patient #9 Review of Patient #9's medical record revealed she presented to the hospital's emergency department on 11/8/15 at 1:44 p.m. and was discharged on [DATE] at 3:07 p.m. Review of the nursing triage note revealed Patient #9's chief complaint was a laceration to the forehead. There was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner. Patient #10 Review of Patient #10's medical record revealed she presented to the hospital's emergency department on 8/13/15 at 7:10 p.m. and was discharged on [DATE] at 10:50 p.m. Review of the nursing triage note revealed Patient #10's chief complaint was coughing and an accumulation of phlegm in her throat. There was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner. Patient #11 Review of Patient #11's medical record revealed she presented to the hospital's emergency department on 10/10/15 at 8:41 a.m. and was discharged on [DATE] at 10:12 a.m. Review of the nursing triage note revealed Patient #11's chief complaint was a prescription refill. There was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner. Patient #12 Review of Patient #12's medical record revealed he presented to the hospital's emergency department on 8/28/15 at 9:41 p.m. and was discharged on [DATE] at 2:05 a.m. Review of the nursing triage note revealed Patient #12's chief complaint was a child with an allergic reaction. There was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner. Patient #13 Review of Patient #13's medical record revealed she presented to the hospital's emergency department on 8/29/15 at 1:53 p.m. and was discharged on [DATE] at 6:24 p.m. Review of the nursing triage note revealed Patient #13's chief complaint was chest pain. There was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner. Patient #14 Review of Patient #14's medical record revealed he presented to the hospital's emergency department on 11/3/15 at 6:59 p.m. and was discharged on [DATE] at 8:31 p.m. Review of the nursing triage note revealed Patient #14's chief complaint was lower back pain. There was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner. Patient #15 Review of Patient #15's medical record revealed he presented to the hospital's emergency department on 11/7/15 at 4:34 p.m. and was discharged on [DATE] at 4:45 p.m. Review of the nursing triage note revealed Patient #15's chief complaint was an elevated blood pressure. There was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner. Patient #16 Review of Patient #16's medical record revealed she presented to the hospital's emergency department on 10/21/15 at 5:45 a.m. and was discharged on [DATE] at 7:12 a.m. Review of the nursing triage note revealed Patient #16's chief complaint was shortness of breath. There was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner. Patient #17 Review of Patient #17's medical record revealed she presented to the hospital's emergency department on 10/20/15 at 8:54 p.m. and was discharged on [DATE] at 11:20 p.m. Review of the nursing triage note revealed Patient #17's chief complaint was a fever. There was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner. Patient #18 Review of Patient #18's medical record revealed he presented to the hospital's emergency department on 9/20/15 at 8:55 p.m. and was discharged on [DATE] at 9:29 p.m. Review of the nursing triage note revealed Patient #18's chief complaint was increased pain and discomfort. There was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner. Patient #19 Review of Patient #19's medical record revealed she presented to the hospital's emergency department on 9/28/15 at 10:36 p.m. and was discharged on [DATE] at 12:16 a.m. Review of the nursing triage note revealed Patient #19's chief complaint was increased blood pressure. There was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner. Patient #20 Review of Patient #20's medical record revealed she presented to the hospital's emergency department on 9/28/15 at 10:30 p.m. and was discharged on [DATE] at 1:48 a.m. Review of the nursing triage note revealed Patient #20's chief complaint was leg pain. There was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that a medical screening examination was performed by a qualified practitioner. In an interview on 12/7/15 at 12:07 p.m. with S4RHIT, she said a list of emergency department patients' medical records that were delinquent had been provided by Staffing Agency "A". She said she had offered assistance to the physicians with completing the medical records and assistance using the computer documentation system but S5Physician had refused her help because he did not like the electronic medical record. She said all of the physicians were offered training on the new computer charting system, but S5Physician and S6Physician were not willing to participate in the training. S4RHIT said it was not acceptable for the physicians not to have documentation of screenings and exams in the patients' medical records. She verified the medical records for Patients #1 and #4 - #20 did not have a medical screening examination documented. In an interview on 12/7/15 at 12:43 p.m. with S2DON, she said the hospital had noticed a problem with emergency department physicians not completing their documentation in the patients' medical records. S2DON verified there was no way to determine if a medical screening was completed by the physicians on Patients #1 and #4 - #20 because there was no documentation by the physicians in the patients' medical records. S2DON agreed no documentation by the physicians in multiple emergency room records was unacceptable practice. In an interview on 12/7/15 at 1:37 p.m. with S1CEO, he said he realized some of the physicians were not documenting a medical screening exam in the emergency department records. S1CEO said there were many emergency department records missing all or part of the physician components. S1CEO verified if there was no documentation in the medical record of a physician assessment or screening it could not be determined if an exam had been completed. S1CEO also said no alternative to the computer documentation system being used in the emergency department had been implemented to ensure compliance with completion of the medical records by the physicians. S1CEO also agreed no action had been taken to ensure the completion of medical records by the ED physicians. In an interview on 12/7/15 on 2:17 p.m. with S5Physician, he said he was the ED director. He said there was no screening on some of the patients because they transitioned to a new medical record computer system. S5Physician said he would not say he did a note on every patient, but some of the notes must have disappeared. S5Physician said he had screened all of his patients but the documentation was not in many of their records. S5Physician said the documentation system was the problem. S5Physician said if he did not hit the save button on the computer his information would disappear. When asked if he had alternative documentation of patients' screenings and assessments, S5Physician said, "No".

See Less ↑
Notes

“Average time” refers to the median wait time (the midpoint of all patients' wait times). References to “doctor or medical practitioner” indicate a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. CMS reports the CT scan quality measure as the percentage of patients who received a scan within 45 minutes. We have reversed that measure so that all measures follow a “lower is better” pattern.

Additional design and development by Mike Tigas and Sisi Wei.

Sources

All data comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Detailed quality measures at the hospital, state and national level were last updated September 2019. Most data was collected between October 2017 and October 2018. Data on ER-related violations is from January 2015 to June 2019.

Additional Info

How We've Updated ER Inspector | Download ProPublica's Emergency Room Planning Toolkit | About This Data

Don’t See Your ER?

In some cases we aren’t able to identify the exact location of a hospital, so it doesn’t appear on our mapped search results. However, it may still be in our database – try looking for it in the list of hospitals on each state's page.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from our database because it doesn't have an emergency department.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from the federal government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data. There are a couple of reasons why a hospital isn’t included in CMS data: it may not participate in Medicare, or it may share a certification number with another hospital (common across large hospital systems).

If you notice a hospital missing from our database, please first check if you can find it on CMS' website, and that it is listed as having an ER. If so, please email us with the hospital name and address.