ER Inspector MAINEGENERAL MEDICAL CENTERMAINEGENERAL MEDICAL CENTER

ER Inspector

Find and Evaluate Every Emergency Room Near You

Updated September 19, 2019

This database was last updated in September 2019. It should only be used as a historical snapshot.Researchers can find more recent data on timely and effective care in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospitals datasets and guidance about hospital regulations.

If you are having a heart attack or life-threatening emergency, call 911.

ER Inspector » Maine » MAINEGENERAL MEDICAL CENTER

Don’t see your ER? Find out why it might be missing.

MAINEGENERAL MEDICAL CENTER

35 medical center parkway, augusta, Maine 04330

(207) 626-1000

73% of Patients Would "Definitely Recommend" this Hospital
(Maine Avg: 75%)

2 violations related to ER care since 2015

Hospital Type

Acute Care Hospitals

Hospital Owner

Voluntary non-profit - Other

ER Volume

High (40K - 60K patients a year)

See this hospital's CMS profile page or inspection reports.

Patient Pathways Through This ER

After a patient arrives at the emergency room, they are typically seen by a doctor or medical practitioner and then either sent home or admitted to the hospital and taken to a room. A small percentage of patients leave without being seen. The chart below shows on average how long each of these pathways take. Lower numbers are better, and all times refer to the average length of time people waited.

Arrives at ER
2% of patients leave without being seen
5hrs 24min Admitted to hospital
7hrs 15min Taken to room
2hrs 33min Sent home

All wait times are average.

Detailed Quality Measures

Here is a more in depth look at each quality measure, compared to state and national averages for hospitals with high ER volumes. Experts caution that very small differences between hospitals for a given measure are unlikely to correspond to noticeable differences in the real world.

Measure
Average for this Hospital
How this Hospital Compares

(to other hospitals with similar
ER volumes, when available)

Discharged Patients
Time Until Sent Home

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being sent home (if not admitted).

2hrs 33min
National Avg.
2hrs 42min
Maine Avg.
2hrs 36min
This Hospital
2hrs 33min
Impatient Patients
Left Without
Being Seen

Percentage of patients who left the emergency room without being seen by a doctor or medical practitioner.

2%
Avg. U.S. Hospital
2%
Avg. Maine Hospital
2%
This Hospital
2%
Admitted Patients
Time Before Admission

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being admitted to the hospital.

5hrs 24min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
5hrs 4min
Maine Avg.
5hrs 24min
This Hospital
5hrs 24min
Admitted Patients
Transfer Time

Among patients admitted, additional time they spent waiting before being taken to their room (sometimes referred to as "boarding time.")

1hr 51min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
2hrs 2min
Maine Avg.
1hr 51min
This Hospital
1hr 51min
Special Patients
CT Scan

Percentage of patients who arrived with stroke symptoms and did not receive brain scan results within 45 mins.

28%
National Avg.
27%
Maine Avg.
38%
This Hospital
28%

Violations Related to ER Care

Problems found in emergency rooms at this hospital since 2015, as identified during the investigation of a complaint. About This Data →

Violation
Full Text
POSTING OF SIGNS

Feb 22, 2017

Based on observation and interviews with key personnel, it was determined that the facility failed to conspicuously post a sign (in a form specified by the Secretary) specifying the rights of individuals regarding Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) statute in places likely to be noticed by all individuals seeking treatment in the Emergency Department (ED) in 2 of 2 EDs observed (Thayer Center for Health and Alfond Center for Health).

See More ↓

Based on observation and interviews with key personnel, it was determined that the facility failed to conspicuously post a sign (in a form specified by the Secretary) specifying the rights of individuals regarding Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) statute in places likely to be noticed by all individuals seeking treatment in the Emergency Department (ED) in 2 of 2 EDs observed (Thayer Center for Health and Alfond Center for Health). The findings include: 1. During a tour of the ED at the Thayer Center for Health (Waterville campus), on February 21, 2017 at approximately 9:30 AM, it was observed that the notification of EMTALA rights was located in the walk in entrance area, behind a countertop containing a computer station and a filing cabinet that separated this space from the rest of the waiting room. The wording on this sign, other than the heading, was not easily visible from in front of the countertop, and a patient would have to go behind the workstation in order to read the entire posting. Additionally, any patient who approached the registration desk and went immediately to the Triage room or into a treatment room would not have passed the EMTALA signage. This finding was confirmed, by the ED Nurse Manager, on February 21, 2017 at approximately 9:45 AM, who stated: "You're right. Most people would not look behind the workstation." 2. During a tour of the ED at the Thayer Center for Health (Waterville campus), on February 21, 2017 at approximately 9:30 AM, it was observed that the ambulance entrance failed to have any sign posted providing EMTALA notification for patients arriving by ambulance. This finding was confirmed, by the ED Nurse Manager, on February 21, 2017 approximately 9:55 AM when she stated "I never thought about the need to place a sign here (in the ambulance entrance)." 3. During a tour of the ED at the Alfond Center for Health (Augusta campus), it was observed on February 21, 2017 at approximately 11:15 AM, that the ambulance entrance failed to have any sign posted providing EMTALA notification for patients arriving by ambulance. This finding was confirmed, by the ED Nurse Manager, on February 21, 2017 at approximately 11:20 AM.

See Less ↑
MEDICAL SCREENING EXAM

Feb 22, 2017

Based on document review, review of medical records, review of policies and procedures and interviews with key personnel, it was determined that the hospital failed to provide an appropriate medical screening examination to both patients who arrived on the same ambulance and whom were both requesting treatment at MaineGeneral Medical Center for 1 of 21 records reviewed (Record A).

See More ↓

Based on document review, review of medical records, review of policies and procedures and interviews with key personnel, it was determined that the hospital failed to provide an appropriate medical screening examination to both patients who arrived on the same ambulance and whom were both requesting treatment at MaineGeneral Medical Center for 1 of 21 records reviewed (Record A). The finding includes: A telephonic interview was conducted on February 22, 2017 at approximately 7:30 AM, with the Thayer Center for Health (TCH) Emergency Department (ED) Charge Nurse who was reported to have been on duty during the early morning of February 11, 2017. The Charge Nurse stated that he/she received telephonic communication from Sebasticook Emergency Medical Services (EMS) on February 11, 2017 at approximately 2:30 AM. EMS crew reported that the ambulance was enroute to TCH with two (2) patients. The ambulance report indicated that both patients were friends who were reportedly intoxicated, both patients expressed suicidal ideation, both patients were seeking treatment for their symptoms, and both patients were described, by the paramedic, as "not safe to be home". The Charge Nurse indicated that he/she assumed that the two (2) patients had formed a "suicide pact". When asked if the Charge Nurse was advised by the paramedic that there was a suicide pact between the two patients, the Charge Nurse replied "I didn't know it as a fact, but based on what I was told I believed it could have occurred". The Charge Nurse then stated that he/she asked the paramedics if one (1) patient could go to another hospital (Hospital B) and one to TCH. He/she stated "I did not think at that time that one patient would be sitting on hospital grounds waiting to go to another facility". A telephonic interview was conducted on February 22, 2017 at approximately 7:42 AM, with the TCH ED attending Physician who was reported to have been on duty during the early morning of February 11, 2017. The Physician stated that he/she had been advised by the Charge Nurse that Sebasticook EMS was enroute to the hospital with reportedly two (2) intoxicated patients, whom it was believed were involved in a suicide pact. The Physician stated that after receiving the initial report from the nurse the plan was to "divide these two individuals and prevent any problems by separating them". The Physician reported that the Paramedic was asked if there were any issues with the second patient going to another facility and was advised that no problems were noted. However, the Physician also stated that he/she had not spoken directly to the EMS crew. Additionally, the Physician reported that he/she did not know that the patients had specifically requested to be transported to MaineGeneral Medical Center, (TCH is a satellite of MaineGeneral Medical Center). The Physician reported that he/she believed that a hospital policy existed which would allow him/her to divert the second patient to another facility. The medical record for Patient A indicated that the ambulance arrived at the TCH ED at 05:19 [5:19 AM] and documentation provided by Hospital B (the receiving hospital) indicated that the ambulance arrived at that facility with the second patient at 5:30 AM (a distance of 2.6 miles). This indicated that the second patient was still in the ambulance while the ambulance was at TCH dropping off the first patient. Additionally, the ambulance drop off at TCH is an enclosed garage area located physically inside the hospital building. An interview was conducted, on February 22, 2017 at approximately 10:48 AM, with the MaineGeneral Medical Center Director of ED Nursing Services. The Nurse Director stated "the decision was in the best interest of the patients and to separate the patients." It was reported that at the time of the incident on February 11, 2017, the ED had the capacity to be able to treat both patients and the hospital was "not on diversion status". Hospital Policy # PC-63, titled, "Ambulance Diversion" states under heading Procedure: "1. When MaineGeneral Medical Center's resources are at capacity or it does not possess the capability to provide an appropriate medical screening examination or stabilizing treatment it may convert to diversionary status. While In diversionary status MaineGeneral Medical Center is not required to accept further transfers to the hospital from EMS. EMS telephone contact does not constitute "coming to the ED" so EMTALA does not apply. Prior to activating any level of diversion, the ED Medical, ED Nursing Director or designee will be consulted. 3. Regional hospital emergency departments to whom patients might be diverted will be notified by ED staff. Those notified will be documented on the Ambulance and Hospital Notification/Divert Log (see attached). The log will then be kept in a notebook in the ED known as the Diversion Log ..." The facility failed to follow this policy when the second patient was diverted to the ED at Hospital B. The TCH ED's resources had not been extended beyond its capacity, there was no indication that the ED medical and Nursing Directors had been involved in the decision process, and the regional EDs had not been notified. This finding was confirmed, by the Director of ED Nursing Services, on February 22, 2017 at approximately 11:00 AM.

See Less ↑
Notes

“Average time” refers to the median wait time (the midpoint of all patients' wait times). References to “doctor or medical practitioner” indicate a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. CMS reports the CT scan quality measure as the percentage of patients who received a scan within 45 minutes. We have reversed that measure so that all measures follow a “lower is better” pattern.

Additional design and development by Mike Tigas and Sisi Wei.

Sources

All data comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Detailed quality measures at the hospital, state and national level were last updated September 2019. Most data was collected between October 2017 and October 2018. Data on ER-related violations is from January 2015 to June 2019.

Additional Info

How We've Updated ER Inspector | Download ProPublica's Emergency Room Planning Toolkit | About This Data

Don’t See Your ER?

In some cases we aren’t able to identify the exact location of a hospital, so it doesn’t appear on our mapped search results. However, it may still be in our database – try looking for it in the list of hospitals on each state's page.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from our database because it doesn't have an emergency department.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from the federal government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data. There are a couple of reasons why a hospital isn’t included in CMS data: it may not participate in Medicare, or it may share a certification number with another hospital (common across large hospital systems).

If you notice a hospital missing from our database, please first check if you can find it on CMS' website, and that it is listed as having an ER. If so, please email us with the hospital name and address.