ER Inspector CARROLL HOSPITAL CENTERCARROLL HOSPITAL CENTER

ER Inspector

Find and Evaluate Every Emergency Room Near You

Updated September 19, 2019

This database was last updated in September 2019. It should only be used as a historical snapshot.Researchers can find more recent data on timely and effective care in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospitals datasets and guidance about hospital regulations.

If you are having a heart attack or life-threatening emergency, call 911.

ER Inspector » Maryland » CARROLL HOSPITAL CENTER

Don’t see your ER? Find out why it might be missing.

CARROLL HOSPITAL CENTER

200 memorial avenue, westminster, Md. 21157

(410) 848-3000

63% of Patients Would "Definitely Recommend" this Hospital
(Md. Avg: 65%)

1 violation related to ER care since 2015

Hospital Type

Acute Care Hospitals

Hospital Owner

Voluntary non-profit - Private

ER Volume

High (40K - 60K patients a year)

See this hospital's CMS profile page or inspection reports.

Patient Pathways Through This ER

After a patient arrives at the emergency room, they are typically seen by a doctor or medical practitioner and then either sent home or admitted to the hospital and taken to a room. A small percentage of patients leave without being seen. The chart below shows on average how long each of these pathways take. Lower numbers are better, and all times refer to the average length of time people waited.

Arrives at ER
1% of patients leave without being seen
7hrs 38min Admitted to hospital
11hrs 32min Taken to room
3hrs 27min Sent home

All wait times are average.

Detailed Quality Measures

Here is a more in depth look at each quality measure, compared to state and national averages for hospitals with high ER volumes. Experts caution that very small differences between hospitals for a given measure are unlikely to correspond to noticeable differences in the real world.

Measure
Average for this Hospital
How this Hospital Compares

(to other hospitals with similar
ER volumes, when available)

Discharged Patients
Time Until Sent Home

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being sent home (if not admitted).

3hrs 27min
National Avg.
2hrs 42min
Md. Avg.
3hrs 10min
This Hospital
3hrs 27min
Impatient Patients
Left Without
Being Seen

Percentage of patients who left the emergency room without being seen by a doctor or medical practitioner.

1%
Avg. U.S. Hospital
2%
Avg. Md. Hospital
3%
This Hospital
1%
Admitted Patients
Time Before Admission

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being admitted to the hospital.

7hrs 38min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
5hrs 4min
Md. Avg.
6hrs 20min
This Hospital
7hrs 38min
Admitted Patients
Transfer Time

Among patients admitted, additional time they spent waiting before being taken to their room (sometimes referred to as "boarding time.")

3hrs 54min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
2hrs 2min
Md. Avg.
2hrs 29min
This Hospital
3hrs 54min
Special Patients
CT Scan

Percentage of patients who arrived with stroke symptoms and did not receive brain scan results within 45 mins.

12%
National Avg.
27%
Md. Avg.
29%
This Hospital
12%

Violations Related to ER Care

Problems found in emergency rooms at this hospital since 2015, as identified during the investigation of a complaint. About This Data →

Violation
Full Text
EMERGENCY SERVICES

Sep 10, 2015

Based on medical record review, staff interviews and hospital document review, hospital staff failed to: 1- Properly triage and assign appropriate Emergency Severity Index score (ESI). 2- Perform a timely medical screening exam. 3- Provide urgent interventions timely for a patient with severe chest pain (notifying physician, obtaining orders for medications, applying oxygen, placing patient on a cardiac monitor) 4- Reassess the patient for changing/deteriorating medical condition. 5- Follow hospital care guidelines and protocols for a patient reporting chest pains. Patient #1 arrived to the Emergency Department (ED) during the evening of 3/17/15 reporting chest pain and nausea at registration.

See More ↓

Based on medical record review, staff interviews and hospital document review, hospital staff failed to: 1- Properly triage and assign appropriate Emergency Severity Index score (ESI). 2- Perform a timely medical screening exam. 3- Provide urgent interventions timely for a patient with severe chest pain (notifying physician, obtaining orders for medications, applying oxygen, placing patient on a cardiac monitor) 4- Reassess the patient for changing/deteriorating medical condition. 5- Follow hospital care guidelines and protocols for a patient reporting chest pains. Patient #1 arrived to the Emergency Department (ED) during the evening of 3/17/15 reporting chest pain and nausea at registration. Patient #1 was promptly was triaged by the ED nurse. The triage nurse documented that the patient continued to report chest pain 10/10 with "chest uneasiness, nausea, and shortness of breath". Vital signs were obtained during triage and indicated an elevated blood pressure and low oxygen saturations of 92% on room air. A 12 lead EKG was obtained, which revealed abnormalities that indicated possible cardiac injury. About 45 minutes after arriving in the emergency department, blood was obtained from the patient and sent to the lab. Although initial assessment was done and diagnostic labs were drawn, the triage staff inaccurately assigned an Emergency Severity Index (ESI) level of 3 for patient #1's condition and he/she was placed in the ED waiting room to wait to be seen by a physician. The ESI is a tool used by emergency departments to triage the severity classification of a patient ranging from ESI-1 (most urgent) to ESI-5 (least urgent). An ESI of 3 would reflect a stable patient not in extreme pain who was safe to wait to be seen. Because the patient was triaged at ESI 3 he was not seen by the physician for 2.5 hours and patient #1 and was not provided oxygen until nearly four hours after his/her initial presentation to the ED. Interview with the clinical resource nurse on the morning of 09/08/15 revealed that a patient reporting severe pain should be scored as an ESI-2 requiring immediate medical attention and intervention, should be placed on a cardiac monitor with oxygen applied, and should be seated in the intake area of triage with constant monitoring of the patient. Medical record review with the clinical resource nurse confirmed that there was no documentation of cardiac monitoring, oxygen placement, or medication for chest pain for patient #1 initiated at the time of triage. About two and a half hours after arrival in the ED, patient #1 was taken from the waiting room to the intake triage area by the physician who then performed the first physician examination. The record revealed that a decision was then made to then admit the patient about three hours after the patient ' s initial presentation in the ED. The patient was then taken to a treatment room at where the second set of vital signs was obtained and the patient's chest pain was reassessed. Documentation by staff indicated that the patient was not placed on oxygen until approximately four hours after arriving in the ED. The nurse administered 0.4mg nitroglycerin (a medication used to treat chest pains) under the patient's tongue with no relief of chest pain and a second 12 lead EKG was obtained about the same time the patient received the oxygen. Shortly after the patient received the oxygen and nitroglycerin the nurse documented in a progress note that she left the treatment room with the patient sitting on the side of the stretcher to show the physician the new EKG; however, other documentation at this time stated that the patient was sitting on the stretcher with the side rails up. Medical record documentation indicated that patient #1 then collapsed, fell to the floor, was unresponsive, had no palpable pulse, and that CPR was initiated. The hospital's patient care guidelines and protocols for a patient reporting chest pains in the ED lists specific nursing interventions. These interventions include taking the patient directly to the treatment area and notifying the physician that the patient is having active chest pains, applying oxygen, attaching the patient to a cardiac monitor, establishing an IV, and administering medications. According to these guidelines the patient would have been placed on bedrest and had vital signs obtained at least every 15 minutes for 1 hour, then every hour, and frequent reassessment of the patient's degree of pain. A physician consultation report on 3/18 indicated that when the patient collapsed he/she apparently "had a ventricular fibrillation arrest. The subsequent EKG... showed acute inferior lateral wall <myocardial infarction>. " Patient #1 was rushed to the catheterization lab where an occluded artery was stented (a surgical intervention to open an occluded artery), and the patient went to the ICU but was " not doing too well... is intubated... blood pressure was also on the very low side, 60s over 30 at most.. " Patient #1 expired later the same day that he/she had been transferred into the ICU and the day after his/her initial presentation in the ED. Reference Federal Tags A 0142 and A0286

See Less ↑
Notes

“Average time” refers to the median wait time (the midpoint of all patients' wait times). References to “doctor or medical practitioner” indicate a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. CMS reports the CT scan quality measure as the percentage of patients who received a scan within 45 minutes. We have reversed that measure so that all measures follow a “lower is better” pattern.

Additional design and development by Mike Tigas and Sisi Wei.

Sources

All data comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Detailed quality measures at the hospital, state and national level were last updated September 2019. Most data was collected between October 2017 and October 2018. Data on ER-related violations is from January 2015 to June 2019.

Additional Info

How We've Updated ER Inspector | Download ProPublica's Emergency Room Planning Toolkit | About This Data

Don’t See Your ER?

In some cases we aren’t able to identify the exact location of a hospital, so it doesn’t appear on our mapped search results. However, it may still be in our database – try looking for it in the list of hospitals on each state's page.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from our database because it doesn't have an emergency department.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from the federal government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data. There are a couple of reasons why a hospital isn’t included in CMS data: it may not participate in Medicare, or it may share a certification number with another hospital (common across large hospital systems).

If you notice a hospital missing from our database, please first check if you can find it on CMS' website, and that it is listed as having an ER. If so, please email us with the hospital name and address.