ER Inspector PROMEDICA MONROE REGIONAL HOSPITALPROMEDICA MONROE REGIONAL HOSPITAL

ER Inspector

Find and Evaluate Every Emergency Room Near You

Updated September 19, 2019

This database was last updated in September 2019. It should only be used as a historical snapshot.Researchers can find more recent data on timely and effective care in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospitals datasets and guidance about hospital regulations.

If you are having a heart attack or life-threatening emergency, call 911.

ER Inspector » Michigan » PROMEDICA MONROE REGIONAL HOSPITAL

Don’t see your ER? Find out why it might be missing.

PROMEDICA MONROE REGIONAL HOSPITAL

718 n macomb st, monroe, Mich. 48162

(734) 240-8400

45% of Patients Would "Definitely Recommend" this Hospital
(Mich. Avg: 71%)

3 violations related to ER care since 2015

Hospital Type

Acute Care Hospitals

Hospital Owner

Voluntary non-profit - Other

ER Volume

High (40K - 60K patients a year)

See this hospital's CMS profile page or inspection reports.

Patient Pathways Through This ER

After a patient arrives at the emergency room, they are typically seen by a doctor or medical practitioner and then either sent home or admitted to the hospital and taken to a room. A small percentage of patients leave without being seen. The chart below shows on average how long each of these pathways take. Lower numbers are better, and all times refer to the average length of time people waited.

Arrives at ER
1% of patients leave without being seen
4hrs 37min Admitted to hospital
6hrs 10min Taken to room
2hrs 6min Sent home

All wait times are average.

Detailed Quality Measures

Here is a more in depth look at each quality measure, compared to state and national averages for hospitals with high ER volumes. Experts caution that very small differences between hospitals for a given measure are unlikely to correspond to noticeable differences in the real world.

Measure
Average for this Hospital
How this Hospital Compares

(to other hospitals with similar
ER volumes, when available)

Discharged Patients
Time Until Sent Home

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being sent home (if not admitted).

2hrs 6min
National Avg.
2hrs 42min
Mich. Avg.
2hrs 40min
This Hospital
2hrs 6min
Impatient Patients
Left Without
Being Seen

Percentage of patients who left the emergency room without being seen by a doctor or medical practitioner.

1%
Avg. U.S. Hospital
2%
Avg. Mich. Hospital
2%
This Hospital
1%
Admitted Patients
Time Before Admission

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being admitted to the hospital.

4hrs 37min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
5hrs 4min
Mich. Avg.
4hrs 36min
This Hospital
4hrs 37min
Admitted Patients
Transfer Time

Among patients admitted, additional time they spent waiting before being taken to their room (sometimes referred to as "boarding time.")

1hr 33min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
2hrs 2min
Mich. Avg.
1hr 38min
This Hospital
1hr 33min
Special Patients
CT Scan

Percentage of patients who arrived with stroke symptoms and did not receive brain scan results within 45 mins.

4%
National Avg.
27%
Mich. Avg.
27%
This Hospital
4%

Violations Related to ER Care

Problems found in emergency rooms at this hospital since 2015, as identified during the investigation of a complaint. About This Data →

Violation
Full Text
COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24

Mar 21, 2018

Based on document review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to comply with the requirements of 42 CFR 489.24 [special responsibilities of Medicare hospitals in emergency cases], specifically the failure to ensure transfer risks were documented with all transferred patients/responsible parties and physicians.

See More ↓

Based on document review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to comply with the requirements of 42 CFR 489.24 [special responsibilities of Medicare hospitals in emergency cases], specifically the failure to ensure transfer risks were documented with all transferred patients/responsible parties and physicians. See A 2409.

See Less ↑
POSTING OF SIGNS

Mar 21, 2018

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post EMTALA signs in areas likely to be noticed by all individuals that visit the emergency department (ED), resulting in the potential for all ED patients to not be informed of their rights to have a medical screening exam and stabilizing treatment in the ED.

See More ↓

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post EMTALA signs in areas likely to be noticed by all individuals that visit the emergency department (ED), resulting in the potential for all ED patients to not be informed of their rights to have a medical screening exam and stabilizing treatment in the ED. Findings include: During the observational tour of the ED, on 3/20/18 between the hours of 1030 - 1215 while accompanied by the ED Director and the Director of Accreditation and Risk Management, it was noted that there were no EMTALA signs posted in the triage rooms, treatment areas and at the ambulance entrance. On 3/21/17 at approximately 1230, ED Director Staff C was queried about the lack of signs and he stated, "I'll get those signs posted in those areas immediately."

See Less ↑
APPROPRIATE TRANSFER

Mar 21, 2018

Based on document review and interview the facility failed to ensure patient transfer forms were signed by the physician for 2 patients (#11 and #20) out of 4 patients reviewed for transfer and the facility failed to ensure the patient or responsible party signed the transfer forms for 2 patients (#6 and #11) of 4 patients reviewed for transfers that explained the risks and benefits of a transfer out of a total of 20 sampled patients resulting in the potential for less than optimal patient outcomes. Findings include: On 3/20/18 between 1400 and 1600 a review of the medical records for patient #6 and #11 were conducted with Emergency Department Director Staff C and the following was revealed: A review of patient #6's chart revealed a patient transfer form dated 10/24/17 that was not signed by the patient.

See More ↓

Based on document review and interview the facility failed to ensure patient transfer forms were signed by the physician for 2 patients (#11 and #20) out of 4 patients reviewed for transfer and the facility failed to ensure the patient or responsible party signed the transfer forms for 2 patients (#6 and #11) of 4 patients reviewed for transfers that explained the risks and benefits of a transfer out of a total of 20 sampled patients resulting in the potential for less than optimal patient outcomes. Findings include: On 3/20/18 between 1400 and 1600 a review of the medical records for patient #6 and #11 were conducted with Emergency Department Director Staff C and the following was revealed: A review of patient #6's chart revealed a patient transfer form dated 10/24/17 that was not signed by the patient. However, the form was signed by a witness and a physician on 10/24/17. There was no evidence in the medical record that documented the patient refused to sign the transfer form. A review of patient #11's chart revealed the patient transfer form was not signed by the patient and/or responsible party or the physician. The form dated 1/17/18 documented the receiving physician had agreed to accept the patient and the patient was to be transferred via ambulance with advanced life support to a local acute care facility. Further review of the medical record for patient #11 revealed a "Critical Care Air/Ground Transfer Certification Form" dated 1/17/18. However, there was no physician's signature that documented the physician had certified the transfer. During an interview on 3/20/18 at 1630 Staff C was queried regarding the lack of patient signatures for transfer for patient #6 and #11. Staff C confirmed the signatures should have been obtained. Staff C said the registration staff members were responsible for obtaining and witnessing patient signatures for transfers. A review of patient #20's chart was reviewed on 3/21/18 at 0915 with Staff C. A patient transfer form dated 12/6/17 revealed the physician did not sign the form. During an interview on 3/21/18 at 1050 Staff C was queried regarding the lack of physician signatures for patient transfers for patient #11 and #20. Staff C confirmed the physician should have signed the patient transfer forms. On 3/21/18 at 1330 a review of the facility's undated "Emergency Medical Screening, Treatment, Transfer and On-Call Roster" policy documented the following: Transfer: C. Upon transfer, the Emergency Department shall provide appropriate medical records regarding its treatment of the individual including, but not limited to, observations of signs or symptoms, preliminary diagnosis, treatment provided, results of any test, informed written consent or transfer certification, and the name and address of any on-call physician who has refused or failed to appear within a reasonable period of time to provided stabilizing treatment.

See Less ↑
Notes

“Average time” refers to the median wait time (the midpoint of all patients' wait times). References to “doctor or medical practitioner” indicate a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. CMS reports the CT scan quality measure as the percentage of patients who received a scan within 45 minutes. We have reversed that measure so that all measures follow a “lower is better” pattern.

Additional design and development by Mike Tigas and Sisi Wei.

Sources

All data comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Detailed quality measures at the hospital, state and national level were last updated September 2019. Most data was collected between October 2017 and October 2018. Data on ER-related violations is from January 2015 to June 2019.

Additional Info

How We've Updated ER Inspector | Download ProPublica's Emergency Room Planning Toolkit | About This Data

Don’t See Your ER?

In some cases we aren’t able to identify the exact location of a hospital, so it doesn’t appear on our mapped search results. However, it may still be in our database – try looking for it in the list of hospitals on each state's page.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from our database because it doesn't have an emergency department.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from the federal government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data. There are a couple of reasons why a hospital isn’t included in CMS data: it may not participate in Medicare, or it may share a certification number with another hospital (common across large hospital systems).

If you notice a hospital missing from our database, please first check if you can find it on CMS' website, and that it is listed as having an ER. If so, please email us with the hospital name and address.