ER Inspector OSWEGO HOSPITALOSWEGO HOSPITAL

ER Inspector

Find and Evaluate Every Emergency Room Near You

Updated September 19, 2019

This database was last updated in September 2019. It should only be used as a historical snapshot.Researchers can find more recent data on timely and effective care in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospitals datasets and guidance about hospital regulations.

If you are having a heart attack or life-threatening emergency, call 911.

ER Inspector » New York » OSWEGO HOSPITAL

Don’t see your ER? Find out why it might be missing.

OSWEGO HOSPITAL

110 west sixth street, oswego, N.Y. 13126

(315) 349-5511

64% of Patients Would "Definitely Recommend" this Hospital
(N.Y. Avg: 66%)

3 violations related to ER care since 2015

Hospital Type

Acute Care Hospitals

Hospital Owner

Voluntary non-profit - Private

ER Volume

Medium (20K - 40K patients a year)

See this hospital's CMS profile page or inspection reports.

Patient Pathways Through This ER

After a patient arrives at the emergency room, they are typically seen by a doctor or medical practitioner and then either sent home or admitted to the hospital and taken to a room. A small percentage of patients leave without being seen. The chart below shows on average how long each of these pathways take. Lower numbers are better, and all times refer to the average length of time people waited.

Arrives at ER
2% of patients leave without being seen
6hrs 9min Admitted to hospital
8hrs 30min Taken to room
2hrs 26min Sent home

All wait times are average.

Detailed Quality Measures

Here is a more in depth look at each quality measure, compared to state and national averages for hospitals with medium ER volumes. Experts caution that very small differences between hospitals for a given measure are unlikely to correspond to noticeable differences in the real world.

Measure
Average for this Hospital
How this Hospital Compares

(to other hospitals with similar
ER volumes, when available)

Discharged Patients
Time Until Sent Home

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being sent home (if not admitted).

2hrs 26min
National Avg.
2hrs 23min
N.Y. Avg.
2hrs 44min
This Hospital
2hrs 26min
Impatient Patients
Left Without
Being Seen

Percentage of patients who left the emergency room without being seen by a doctor or medical practitioner.

2%
Avg. U.S. Hospital
2%
Avg. N.Y. Hospital
2%
This Hospital
2%
Admitted Patients
Time Before Admission

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being admitted to the hospital.

6hrs 9min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
4hrs 21min
N.Y. Avg.
5hrs 34min
This Hospital
6hrs 9min
Admitted Patients
Transfer Time

Among patients admitted, additional time they spent waiting before being taken to their room (sometimes referred to as "boarding time.")

2hrs 21min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
1hr 33min
N.Y. Avg.
2hrs 2min
This Hospital
2hrs 21min
Special Patients
CT Scan

Percentage of patients who arrived with stroke symptoms and did not receive brain scan results within 45 mins.

No Data Available

The number of cases/patients is too few to report.

National Avg.
27%
N.Y. Avg.
26%
This Hospital
No Data Available

Violations Related to ER Care

Problems found in emergency rooms at this hospital since 2015, as identified during the investigation of a complaint. About This Data →

Violation
Full Text
EMERGENCY SERVICES POLICIES

Oct 17, 2018

Based on document review, medical record (MR) review and interview, emergency department (ED) staff did not ensure that emergency care was provided in accordance with generally accepted standards.

See More ↓

Based on document review, medical record (MR) review and interview, emergency department (ED) staff did not ensure that emergency care was provided in accordance with generally accepted standards. Specifically, in 4 of 12 MRs reviewed, nursing staff did not obtain vital signs at frequencies required per ED policy and procedure (P&P). In 1 of 12 MRs reviewed, nursing staff did not document complete vital signs for a patient presenting with a mental health condition. This could cause staff to be unaware of a patient's declining condition. Findings include: -- Review of the facility P&P titled "Vital Signs," last reviewed 2/2017, indicated all patients should have a complete set of vital signs done and recorded that includes blood pressure (B/P), pulse (P), respirations (R) and pain level based on an assigned Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage category. ESI levels include: #1- resuscitation, #2- emergent with abnormal vital signs, #3- urgent, #4- non-urgent and 5- referred. For example, an ESI of #2 with abnormal vital signs require staff to complete vitals signs every 30 minutes for one hour and then if stable, every 30 minutes for one hour, then every 1 hour x 2 followed by every 4 hours until an admission bed is available. -- Review of Patient #1's MR revealed he presented to the ED via emergency medical services (EMS) from urgent care on 8/30/18 at 1:32 pm with chest pain and difficulty breathing. Staff triaged the patient at 1:49 pm and assigned an ESI level of #2. Patient #1's vital signs were abnormal: temperature (T)- 97.6 degrees Fahrenheit (F), P-91, B/P 117/84, R- 20 and 94% oxygen saturation on 4 liters of oxygen. Staff obtained vital signs again at 2:44 pm and B/P was 94/66 (abnormal). An additional set of vital signs were not obtained again until 4:10 pm (one hour and 25 minutes later). At that time B/P was 78/48 (abnormal). There was no documentation that vital signs were completed as required per P&P. -- Review of Patient #2's MR revealed he (MDS) dated [DATE] at 2:52 pm with difficulty breathing. Staff triaged the patient at 3:46 pm and assigned an ESI level of #2. Vital signs were obtained and revealed a B/P of 143/88 (abnormal). Patient #2's vital signs were not obtained again until 6:37 pm (3 hours later). B/P at that time was 167/70. There was no documentation that vital signs were completed as required per P&P. -- Review of Patient #3's MR revealed she (MDS) dated [DATE] at 9:01 pm with chest pain. Staff triaged the patient at 9:05 pm and assigned an ESI level of #2. Vital signs at that time were: B/P- 190/108 and P-134. Patient #3 remained in the ED and staff obtained vitals signs at 9:20 pm: BP-107/69 and P-109 and at 11:15 pm (approximately 2 hours later) BP-115/64 and P-90. There was no documentation that vitals were completed as required per policy. -- Review of Patient #4's MR revealed she presented to the ED at 4:48 am, as a §9.41 Mental Health Law (MHL) emergency admission with local police. Staff triaged Patient #4 and assigned an ESI level #2. Staff obtained vital signs at 4:50 am, 5:12 am, 5:30 am, and 6:05 am. However, there was no documentation that staff obtained vital signs from 6:05 am until patient discharge from the ED at 1:30 pm (over 7 hours later). Additionally, vital signs obtained earlier were not complete, e.g., vital signs at 5:12 am did not include a temperature or respiration and vital signs at 6:05 am did not include a temperature and blood pressure. Each set of vital signs documented was not complete (i.e., T, P, R, B/P and oxygen saturation). -- During interview of Staff A, Director of the ED on 10/16/18 at 12:30 pm, he/she indicated that a complete set of vital signs should include the temperature and oxygen saturation, however this is not included in their P&P. Staff A acknowledged the lack of acceptable frequency of vital signs in the MRs noted above and stated the vital sign P&P is due for revision.

See Less ↑
EMERGENCY SERVICES PERSONNEL

Oct 17, 2018

Based on findings from document review and interview, 1 of 3 personnel files reviewed for nursing staff, Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) lacked documentation of annual mandatory training (e.g., patient's rights, parents bill of rights, advance directives, infection control, fire safety). Findings include: -- Per review of personnel file for Staff B, employed since 7/2012, it lacked documentation of completion of the 2018 annual mandatory training. -- During interview of Staff C, Director of Employee Relations on 10/17/18 at 2:30 pm, he/she stated that all staff are provided their annual mandatory education in May for completion.

See More ↓

Based on findings from document review and interview, 1 of 3 personnel files reviewed for nursing staff, Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) lacked documentation of annual mandatory training (e.g., patient's rights, parents bill of rights, advance directives, infection control, fire safety). Findings include: -- Per review of personnel file for Staff B, employed since 7/2012, it lacked documentation of completion of the 2018 annual mandatory training. -- During interview of Staff C, Director of Employee Relations on 10/17/18 at 2:30 pm, he/she stated that all staff are provided their annual mandatory education in May for completion. -- During interview of Staff A, Director of Emergency Department on 10/16/18 at 2:30 pm, he/she stated that Staff B indicated the annual mandatory training was completed. However, there was no documentation of the completed training available to review.

See Less ↑
INTEGRATION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES

Jul 27, 2016

Based on findings from medical record (MR) review, document review and interview, in 1 (Patient #1) of 3 MRs reviewed, the facilty did not effectively integrate coordination and communication between the Emergency Department (ED) and another hospital service (security) to protect the health and safety of a patient.

See More ↓

Based on findings from medical record (MR) review, document review and interview, in 1 (Patient #1) of 3 MRs reviewed, the facilty did not effectively integrate coordination and communication between the Emergency Department (ED) and another hospital service (security) to protect the health and safety of a patient. As a result, a patient (Patient #1) eloped from the facility and there was potential of a compromise in his safety. Additionally, an incident report was not completed for this elopement per the facility's policy and procedure (P&P). Findings include: 1. Review of Patient #1's MR identified the following information: Patient #1, a 15 year old, was brought to the ED on 7/14/16 at 11:44 pm with alcohol intoxication and substance abuse. He was triaged at 11:46 pm as a level 2 acuity out of 5, with 1 being life-threatening. A medical screening exam performed at 11:50 pm determined that the patient drank a large amount of vodka and reportedly smoked 4 grams of synthetic marijuana with a noted clinical impression of alcohol intoxication. Patient #1 admitted to thoughts of self harm. A Pediatric PHQ 9-Suicide screen revealed that Patient #1 was not at risk for suicide. An Elopement Risk Assessment revealed that Patient #1 was an elopement risk and considered to be a danger to self or others. Patient #1 was placed in room #14 closest to the nurse's station for maximum visibility. Review of security "Shift Activity Report," dated 7/15/16, revealed at 12:00 am a security guard was monitoring 3 rooms in the ED, including Patient #1 in room #14. The next entry, at 12:00 am, indicated "room #14 walk out." On 7/15/16 at 12:32 am, nursing documentation revealed patient not in room, patient seen leaving by family of next room out ambulance doors. A Request for Law Enforcement Pick-up form dated 7/15/16 was initiated. During interview of Staff B, the Director of Quality and Safety on 7/28/16 at 12:30 pm, he/she acknowledged the lack of communication between the security guard and ED staff. 2. Review of a security "Shift Activity Report," dated 7/15/16 revealed the following information: Any of the following items checked yes MUST be followed by an Incident Report: 1. Missing or Defective Equipment 2. Security Breaches 3. Safety hazards 4. Suspicious Activity 5. Client Policy Violations 6. Injuries/Illnesses 7. Property Damage All the above boxes (1-7) were checked "no". However, during this shift a [AGE]-year-old patient at risk for elopement, did elope and was returned to the hospital by law enforcement. During interview of Staff C, the Facilities Director, on 7/28/16 at 12:00 pm, he/she indicated he/she supervises contracted security staff at the facility. He/she did not know if a patient elopement would constitute a security breach and therefore require an incident report. The facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled "Incident/Event Reporting," dated 10/28/15, indicated that a close call is an event that could have resulted in patient harm. During interview with Staff B, on 7/28/16 at 12:30 pm, he/she acknowledged that an incident report should have been completed for this elopement.

See Less ↑
Notes

“Average time” refers to the median wait time (the midpoint of all patients' wait times). References to “doctor or medical practitioner” indicate a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. CMS reports the CT scan quality measure as the percentage of patients who received a scan within 45 minutes. We have reversed that measure so that all measures follow a “lower is better” pattern.

Additional design and development by Mike Tigas and Sisi Wei.

Sources

All data comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Detailed quality measures at the hospital, state and national level were last updated September 2019. Most data was collected between October 2017 and October 2018. Data on ER-related violations is from January 2015 to June 2019.

Additional Info

How We've Updated ER Inspector | Download ProPublica's Emergency Room Planning Toolkit | About This Data

Don’t See Your ER?

In some cases we aren’t able to identify the exact location of a hospital, so it doesn’t appear on our mapped search results. However, it may still be in our database – try looking for it in the list of hospitals on each state's page.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from our database because it doesn't have an emergency department.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from the federal government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data. There are a couple of reasons why a hospital isn’t included in CMS data: it may not participate in Medicare, or it may share a certification number with another hospital (common across large hospital systems).

If you notice a hospital missing from our database, please first check if you can find it on CMS' website, and that it is listed as having an ER. If so, please email us with the hospital name and address.