ER Inspector PUTNAM HOSPITAL CENTERPUTNAM HOSPITAL CENTER

ER Inspector

Find and Evaluate Every Emergency Room Near You

Updated September 19, 2019

This database was last updated in September 2019. It should only be used as a historical snapshot.Researchers can find more recent data on timely and effective care in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospitals datasets and guidance about hospital regulations.

If you are having a heart attack or life-threatening emergency, call 911.

ER Inspector » New York » PUTNAM HOSPITAL CENTER

Don’t see your ER? Find out why it might be missing.

PUTNAM HOSPITAL CENTER

670 stoneleigh avenue, carmel, N.Y. 10512

(914) 279-5711

77% of Patients Would "Definitely Recommend" this Hospital
(N.Y. Avg: 66%)

2 violations related to ER care since 2015

Hospital Type

Acute Care Hospitals

Hospital Owner

Voluntary non-profit - Private

ER Volume

Medium (20K - 40K patients a year)

See this hospital's CMS profile page or inspection reports.

Patient Pathways Through This ER

After a patient arrives at the emergency room, they are typically seen by a doctor or medical practitioner and then either sent home or admitted to the hospital and taken to a room. A small percentage of patients leave without being seen. The chart below shows on average how long each of these pathways take. Lower numbers are better, and all times refer to the average length of time people waited.

Arrives at ER
1% of patients leave without being seen
3hrs 44min Admitted to hospital
4hrs 52min Taken to room
2hrs 36min Sent home

All wait times are average.

Detailed Quality Measures

Here is a more in depth look at each quality measure, compared to state and national averages for hospitals with medium ER volumes. Experts caution that very small differences between hospitals for a given measure are unlikely to correspond to noticeable differences in the real world.

Measure
Average for this Hospital
How this Hospital Compares

(to other hospitals with similar
ER volumes, when available)

Discharged Patients
Time Until Sent Home

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being sent home (if not admitted).

2hrs 36min
National Avg.
2hrs 23min
N.Y. Avg.
2hrs 44min
This Hospital
2hrs 36min
Impatient Patients
Left Without
Being Seen

Percentage of patients who left the emergency room without being seen by a doctor or medical practitioner.

1%
Avg. U.S. Hospital
2%
Avg. N.Y. Hospital
2%
This Hospital
1%
Admitted Patients
Time Before Admission

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being admitted to the hospital.

3hrs 44min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
4hrs 21min
N.Y. Avg.
5hrs 34min
This Hospital
3hrs 44min
Admitted Patients
Transfer Time

Among patients admitted, additional time they spent waiting before being taken to their room (sometimes referred to as "boarding time.")

1hr 8min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
1hr 33min
N.Y. Avg.
2hrs 2min
This Hospital
1hr 8min
Special Patients
CT Scan

Percentage of patients who arrived with stroke symptoms and did not receive brain scan results within 45 mins.

8%
National Avg.
27%
N.Y. Avg.
26%
This Hospital
8%

Violations Related to ER Care

Problems found in emergency rooms at this hospital since 2015, as identified during the investigation of a complaint. About This Data →

Violation
Full Text
ON CALL PHYSICIANS

Aug 6, 2018

Based on medical record review, document review and interview, in one (1) of 20 medical records reviewed, the facility failed to have written policies and procedures to ensure that the care needs of patients are met when on-call physicians are permitted to schedule elective surgery with their on-call duties (Patient #1). This failure may result in delay care of patients requiring evaluation and treatment by on-call physicians. Findings include: Review of medical record for Patient #1 identified a six (6) year old who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) on 5/09/18 at 3:45 PM after a fall.

See More ↓

Based on medical record review, document review and interview, in one (1) of 20 medical records reviewed, the facility failed to have written policies and procedures to ensure that the care needs of patients are met when on-call physicians are permitted to schedule elective surgery with their on-call duties (Patient #1). This failure may result in delay care of patients requiring evaluation and treatment by on-call physicians. Findings include: Review of medical record for Patient #1 identified a six (6) year old who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) on 5/09/18 at 3:45 PM after a fall. A full x-ray revealed multiple fractures of the right arm. At 5:30 PM, the ED physician's notes revealed she had a phone call consult with Staff C, orthopedist who "agreed to evaluate the patient in the ED for cast, consulted anesthesia. Anesthesia evaluated patient and then re-discussed case with orthopedist at which time the decision to transfer the patient was made." The patient remained in the ED until 10:00 PM when he was transferred to another hospital. There was no documentation in the medical record that the orthopedist examined the patient. Review of the on call schedule revealed Staff C, an orthopedist was on-call for the ED on 5/09/18 from 7:00 AM - 7:00 PM. During an interview conducted on 7/16/18 at 12:30 PM, Staff C stated that he was operating on elective patients in the operating room on 5/09/18 until about 9:00 PM - 10:00 PM and that he was the orthopedic consultant for the ED on 5/09/18. Staff C acknowledged that he did not go to the ED to examine Patient #1 on 5/09/18. When questioned about ED emergencies while he is operating, he stated he would see patients between cases. Review of the facility's rules and regulations and bylaws revealed there was no protocol or direction for consultations in the ED. The facility did not have written policies and procedures in place to respond to situations in which a particular specialty is not available or the on-call physician cannot respond because the physician is in elective surgery simultaneously with their on-call duties. This finding was shared with Staff A, the Director of Quality on 7/13/18 at approximately 3:00 PM. .

See Less ↑
EMERGENCY ROOM LOG

Aug 6, 2018

Based on medical record review, document review and interview in seven (7) of 24 medical records reviewed, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a central log of each patient who presented to the facility for emergency care.

See More ↓

Based on medical record review, document review and interview in seven (7) of 24 medical records reviewed, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a central log of each patient who presented to the facility for emergency care. This was evident for Patients #s 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. Findings include: Review of the dedicated emergency department (ED) log revealed: Patient #2 (MDS) dated [DATE] with a complaint of suicidal ideation. There was no documentation of the patient's name or medical record number in the ED log. Patient #3 (MDS) dated [DATE] because she wanted to kill herself. There was no documentation of the patient's name or medical record number in the ED log. Similar findings were noted to be missing information in the ED log for Patients #4, #5, #6, #7 and #8. The facility's policy titled "Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) last reviewed 4/13 states "a 24-hour log is maintained reflecting medical record number, name, age, gender, date, time and means of arrival." This finding was shared with the Staff A, the Director of Quality on 7/16/18 at 3:30 PM.

See Less ↑
Notes

“Average time” refers to the median wait time (the midpoint of all patients' wait times). References to “doctor or medical practitioner” indicate a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. CMS reports the CT scan quality measure as the percentage of patients who received a scan within 45 minutes. We have reversed that measure so that all measures follow a “lower is better” pattern.

Additional design and development by Mike Tigas and Sisi Wei.

Sources

All data comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Detailed quality measures at the hospital, state and national level were last updated September 2019. Most data was collected between October 2017 and October 2018. Data on ER-related violations is from January 2015 to June 2019.

Additional Info

How We've Updated ER Inspector | Download ProPublica's Emergency Room Planning Toolkit | About This Data

Don’t See Your ER?

In some cases we aren’t able to identify the exact location of a hospital, so it doesn’t appear on our mapped search results. However, it may still be in our database – try looking for it in the list of hospitals on each state's page.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from our database because it doesn't have an emergency department.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from the federal government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data. There are a couple of reasons why a hospital isn’t included in CMS data: it may not participate in Medicare, or it may share a certification number with another hospital (common across large hospital systems).

If you notice a hospital missing from our database, please first check if you can find it on CMS' website, and that it is listed as having an ER. If so, please email us with the hospital name and address.