ER Inspector GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTERGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER

ER Inspector

Find and Evaluate Every Emergency Room Near You

Updated September 19, 2019

This database was last updated in September 2019. It should only be used as a historical snapshot.Researchers can find more recent data on timely and effective care in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospitals datasets and guidance about hospital regulations.

If you are having a heart attack or life-threatening emergency, call 911.

ER Inspector » New York » GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER

Don’t see your ER? Find out why it might be missing.

GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER

1000 montauk highway, west islip, N.Y. 11795

(631) 376-3000

63% of Patients Would "Definitely Recommend" this Hospital
(N.Y. Avg: 66%)

2 violations related to ER care since 2015

Hospital Type

Acute Care Hospitals

Hospital Owner

Voluntary non-profit - Church

ER Volume

Very high (60K+ patients a year)

See this hospital's CMS profile page or inspection reports.

Patient Pathways Through This ER

After a patient arrives at the emergency room, they are typically seen by a doctor or medical practitioner and then either sent home or admitted to the hospital and taken to a room. A small percentage of patients leave without being seen. The chart below shows on average how long each of these pathways take. Lower numbers are better, and all times refer to the average length of time people waited.

Arrives at ER
1% of patients leave without being seen
7hrs 50min Admitted to hospital
12hrs 31min Taken to room
3hrs 27min Sent home

All wait times are average.

Detailed Quality Measures

Here is a more in depth look at each quality measure, compared to state and national averages for hospitals with very high ER volumes. Experts caution that very small differences between hospitals for a given measure are unlikely to correspond to noticeable differences in the real world.

Measure
Average for this Hospital
How this Hospital Compares

(to other hospitals with similar
ER volumes, when available)

Discharged Patients
Time Until Sent Home

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being sent home (if not admitted).

3hrs 27min
National Avg.
2hrs 50min
N.Y. Avg.
3hrs 26min
This Hospital
3hrs 27min
Impatient Patients
Left Without
Being Seen

Percentage of patients who left the emergency room without being seen by a doctor or medical practitioner.

1%
Avg. U.S. Hospital
2%
Avg. N.Y. Hospital
2%
This Hospital
1%
Admitted Patients
Time Before Admission

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being admitted to the hospital.

7hrs 50min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
5hrs 33min
N.Y. Avg.
7hrs 50min
This Hospital
7hrs 50min
Admitted Patients
Transfer Time

Among patients admitted, additional time they spent waiting before being taken to their room (sometimes referred to as "boarding time.")

4hrs 41min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
2hrs 24min
N.Y. Avg.
3hrs 12min
This Hospital
4hrs 41min
Special Patients
CT Scan

Percentage of patients who arrived with stroke symptoms and did not receive brain scan results within 45 mins.

No Data Available

The number of cases/patients is too few to report. Results are based on a shorter time period than required.

National Avg.
27%
N.Y. Avg.
26%
This Hospital
No Data Available

Violations Related to ER Care

Problems found in emergency rooms at this hospital since 2015, as identified during the investigation of a complaint. About This Data →

Violation
Full Text
EMERGENCY SERVICES POLICIES

Jan 9, 2015

. Based on record review, Policy review and interview, the facility failed to establish a follow-up procedure for triaged patients that left without being seen by a Physician in five (5) out of nineteen (19) ED (Emergency Department) Records reviewed (Patients #14, #15, #24, #25 and #26). Findings: Review of the medical record for Patient #26 documents that the patient (MDS) dated [DATE] at 5:12PM with complaint of Abdomen Pain.

See More ↓

. Based on record review, Policy review and interview, the facility failed to establish a follow-up procedure for triaged patients that left without being seen by a Physician in five (5) out of nineteen (19) ED (Emergency Department) Records reviewed (Patients #14, #15, #24, #25 and #26). Findings: Review of the medical record for Patient #26 documents that the patient (MDS) dated [DATE] at 5:12PM with complaint of Abdomen Pain. The initial triage was documented at 5:34PM. The patient was triaged as "Urgent" Level 3. The Medical Record documents discharge at 2:08AM on 12/30/14 as "Not seen by MD/PA (Medical Doctor/Physician Assistant) ". The record lacks documented evidence of follow up with the patient after they left the ED. Review of the medical record for Patient #15 documents that the patient (MDS) dated [DATE] at 11:20AM with complaints of Shortness of Breath with Chest Pain. The initial triage call was documented at 11:33AM. The patient was triaged as "Urgent" Level 3. The Medical Record documents discharge at 6:12PM on 12/29/14 as "Not seen by MD/PA". The record lacks documented evidence of follow up with the patient after they left the ED. Review of the medical record for Patient #25 documents that the patient (MDS) dated [DATE] at 5:03PM with complaint of Abdominal Pain. The initial triage call was documented at 5:05PM. The patient was triaged as "Urgent" Level 3. The Medical Record documents discharge at 11:06PM as "Not seen by MD/PA". The record lacks documented evidence of follow up with the patient after they left the ED. Similar findings were noted in two (2) additional records reviewed (Patients #14 and #24). An interview on 01/06/14 at 11:00AM with Staff Members #8 and #7 confirmed that the facility lacks a procedure for follow up with patients that leave the Emergency Department after triage without being seen by an MD.

See Less ↑
QUALIFIED EMERGENCY SERVICES PERSONNEL

Jan 9, 2015

. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a) a timely Medical Evaluation for Emergency Department (ED) patients after Triage in five (5) out of nineteen (19) ED Medical Records reviewed (Patients #14, #16, #24, #25 and #26), and b) adequate staffing to provide appropriate Nursing care to meet the needs of admitted patients housed in the emergency room in two (2) out of eight (8) Medical Records (Patients #20 and #21). . Findings: . a) Review of the medical record for patient #26 revealed the patient (MDS) dated [DATE] at 5:12PM with complaints of Abdomen Pain for two (2) weeks stating she had a CT (computed tomography) scan which showed a Gallbladder Polyp and was directed to the ED by her Physician. . The initial triage call was documented at 5:34PM.

See More ↓

. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a) a timely Medical Evaluation for Emergency Department (ED) patients after Triage in five (5) out of nineteen (19) ED Medical Records reviewed (Patients #14, #16, #24, #25 and #26), and b) adequate staffing to provide appropriate Nursing care to meet the needs of admitted patients housed in the emergency room in two (2) out of eight (8) Medical Records (Patients #20 and #21). . Findings: . a) Review of the medical record for patient #26 revealed the patient (MDS) dated [DATE] at 5:12PM with complaints of Abdomen Pain for two (2) weeks stating she had a CT (computed tomography) scan which showed a Gallbladder Polyp and was directed to the ED by her Physician. . The initial triage call was documented at 5:34PM. The patient was triaged as "Urgent" Level 3. . The first follow up triage call was documented on 12/30/14 at 1:36AM, eight (8) hours and two (2) minutes after the patient first presented to the facility. Documentation notes the patient "departed" and "Not seen by MD (Physician)/ PA (Physician's Assistant)" at 2:08AM. . The Medical Record lacks documentation that the patient received a Medical Evaluation during the eight (8) hour wait from the initial presentation until the first follow up triage call. . Review of the medical record for patient #14 (MDS) dated [DATE] at 6:46PM with complaints of Fever, Headache, Back and Throat Pain. . The initial triage call was documented at 6:51PM. The patient was triaged as "Urgent" Level 3. . The first follow up triage call was documented on 12/11/14 at 2:06AM, seven (7) hours and fifteen (15) minutes after the patient first presented to the facility. Documentation notes the patient "departed" and "Not seen by MD/PA" at 2:58AM. . The Medical Record lacks documentation that the patient received a Medical Evaluation during the seven (7) hour wait from the initial presentation until the first follow up triage call. . Review of the medical record for patient #16 reveals the patient (MDS) dated [DATE] at 6:40PM with complaint of Chest Pain. . The initial triage call was documented at 6:42PM. Nursing Notes at 6:44PM document "appears to be in moderate distress". The patient's Heart Rate was 116, Respiratory Rate 24 and Pain Level 10. The patient was triaged as "Urgent" Level 3. . A Nursing Note at 6:50PM documents "Patient very restless unable to sit still for EKG, reports he can't breathe". An EKG shows the patient in Sinus Tachycardia. No further Nursing Documentation noted in the record. . Documentation notes the patient "departed" and "Not seen by MD/PA" at 10:57PM. . The Medical Record lacks documentation that the patient received a Medical Evaluation during the four (4) hour wait from the initial presentation until discharge. . Review of the medical record for patient #24 reveals the patient (MDS) dated [DATE] at 5:39PM with complaints of Fever, Cough and Pleurisy. The initial triage call was documented at 6:30PM. The patient was triaged as "Urgent" Level 3. . The first follow up triage call was documented on 12/23/14 at 12:31AM, seven (7) hours and eight (8) minutes after the patient first presented to the facility. Documentation notes the patient "departed" and "Not seen by MD/PA" at 1:22AM. . The Medical Record lacks documentation that the patient received a Medical Evaluation from a Physician during the seven (7) hour wait from the initial presentation until the first follow up triage call. . Review of the medical record for patient #25 reveals the patient (MDS) dated [DATE] at 5:03PM with complaints of Right Back and Abdomen Pain. The initial triage call was documented at 5:05PM. The patient was triaged as "Urgent" Level 3. . The first follow up triage call was documented at 11:03PM, six (6) hours after the patient first presented to the facility. Documentation notes the patient "departed" and "Not seen by MD/PA" at 11:06AM. . The Medical Record lacks documentation that the patient received a Medical Evaluation during the six (6) hour wait from the initial presentation until the first follow up triage call. . b) Review of the medical record for patient #21 reveals the patient (MDS) dated [DATE] at 3:27PM in Respiratory Distress. The patient was triaged as "Emergent" Level 2, admitted as an inpatient at 7:57PM and was housed in the ED until 11:45PM when the patient was transferred to the Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU). . Review of the Medical Record revealed that an MD Order was placed at 3:52PM, shortly after the patient arrived at the ED for insertion of a Foley catheter and a STAT (immediate) Urinalysis. Documented evidence shows the Foley catheter was not placed until 11:20PM and the Urinalysis was not obtained until 12:30AM on 01/08/15, more than seven (7) hours after the STAT Order was placed. . Review of the ED Staff Schedule documents the Nurse's assignment as having two (2) MICU patients, six (6) ED "Treat & Release" patients and two (2) admitted Med-Surg patients during the 7P-7A shift on 01/07/15. The Nurse was assigned ten (10) patients, including the two (2) admitted Critical Care patients. . Review of the medical record for patient #20 reveals the patient (MDS) dated [DATE] at 10:47PM with complaint of Vomiting Blood. The patient was triaged as "Emergent" Level 2, admitted as an inpatient on 12/12/14 at 2:37AM and was housed in the ED until 13:30PM on 12/13/14 when the patient was transferred to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). . Review of the Medical Record revealed STAT MD Orders were placed at 11:58PM on 12/11/14, for a STAT Urinalysis. Documented evidence shows the Urinalysis was not obtained until 7:48AM on 12/13/14, more than thirty-one (31) hours after the STAT Order was placed. . Review of ED Staff Schedule documents the Nurse's assignment as having one (1) ICU patient, as well as seven (7) admitted Med-Surg patients throughout the 7P-7A shift on 12/11/14. The Nurse was assigned eight (8) admitted patients, including the Critical Care patient. . On 12/29/14 one (1) Nurse's assignment included fourteen (14) patients, including two (2) MICU patients, four (4) admitted Med-Surg (Medical-Surgical) patients and eight (8) ED "Treat & Release" patients. . On 12/29/14 another Nurse's assignment included six (6) patients, including two (2) MICU patients, four (4) admitted Med-Surg patients, and three (3) ED "Treat & Release" patients. . On 12/16/14 one (1) Nurse's assignment included six (6) patients, including one (1) ICU patient, one (1) admitted Telemetry patient, three (3) admitted Med-Surg patients and two (2) ED "Treat & Release" patients. . These assignments were confirmed during interview with Staff #8 on 01/09/14 at 1:30PM.

See Less ↑
Notes

“Average time” refers to the median wait time (the midpoint of all patients' wait times). References to “doctor or medical practitioner” indicate a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. CMS reports the CT scan quality measure as the percentage of patients who received a scan within 45 minutes. We have reversed that measure so that all measures follow a “lower is better” pattern.

Additional design and development by Mike Tigas and Sisi Wei.

Sources

All data comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Detailed quality measures at the hospital, state and national level were last updated September 2019. Most data was collected between October 2017 and October 2018. Data on ER-related violations is from January 2015 to June 2019.

Additional Info

How We've Updated ER Inspector | Download ProPublica's Emergency Room Planning Toolkit | About This Data

Don’t See Your ER?

In some cases we aren’t able to identify the exact location of a hospital, so it doesn’t appear on our mapped search results. However, it may still be in our database – try looking for it in the list of hospitals on each state's page.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from our database because it doesn't have an emergency department.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from the federal government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data. There are a couple of reasons why a hospital isn’t included in CMS data: it may not participate in Medicare, or it may share a certification number with another hospital (common across large hospital systems).

If you notice a hospital missing from our database, please first check if you can find it on CMS' website, and that it is listed as having an ER. If so, please email us with the hospital name and address.