ER Inspector MEDICAL CITY NORTH HILLSMEDICAL CITY NORTH HILLS

ER Inspector

Find and Evaluate Every Emergency Room Near You

Updated September 19, 2019

This database was last updated in September 2019. It should only be used as a historical snapshot.Researchers can find more recent data on timely and effective care in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospitals datasets and guidance about hospital regulations.

If you are having a heart attack or life-threatening emergency, call 911.

ER Inspector » Texas » MEDICAL CITY NORTH HILLS

Don’t see your ER? Find out why it might be missing.

MEDICAL CITY NORTH HILLS

4401 booth calloway road, north richland hills, Tex. 76180

(817) 255-1000

76% of Patients Would "Definitely Recommend" this Hospital
(Tex. Avg: 74%)

4 violations related to ER care since 2015

Hospital Type

Acute Care Hospitals

Hospital Owner

Proprietary

ER Volume

Medium (20K - 40K patients a year)

See this hospital's CMS profile page or inspection reports.

Patient Pathways Through This ER

After a patient arrives at the emergency room, they are typically seen by a doctor or medical practitioner and then either sent home or admitted to the hospital and taken to a room. A small percentage of patients leave without being seen. The chart below shows on average how long each of these pathways take. Lower numbers are better, and all times refer to the average length of time people waited.

Arrives at ER
1% of patients leave without being seen
4hrs 23min Admitted to hospital
5hrs 38min Taken to room
2hrs 25min Sent home

All wait times are average.

Detailed Quality Measures

Here is a more in depth look at each quality measure, compared to state and national averages for hospitals with medium ER volumes. Experts caution that very small differences between hospitals for a given measure are unlikely to correspond to noticeable differences in the real world.

Measure
Average for this Hospital
How this Hospital Compares

(to other hospitals with similar
ER volumes, when available)

Discharged Patients
Time Until Sent Home

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being sent home (if not admitted).

2hrs 25min
National Avg.
2hrs 23min
Tex. Avg.
2hrs 20min
This Hospital
2hrs 25min
Impatient Patients
Left Without
Being Seen

Percentage of patients who left the emergency room without being seen by a doctor or medical practitioner.

1%
Avg. U.S. Hospital
2%
Avg. Tex. Hospital
2%
This Hospital
1%
Admitted Patients
Time Before Admission

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being admitted to the hospital.

4hrs 23min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
4hrs 21min
Tex. Avg.
4hrs 20min
This Hospital
4hrs 23min
Admitted Patients
Transfer Time

Among patients admitted, additional time they spent waiting before being taken to their room (sometimes referred to as "boarding time.")

1hr 15min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
1hr 33min
Tex. Avg.
1hr 35min
This Hospital
1hr 15min
Special Patients
CT Scan

Percentage of patients who arrived with stroke symptoms and did not receive brain scan results within 45 mins.

No Data Available

The number of cases/patients is too few to report.

National Avg.
27%
Tex. Avg.
28%
This Hospital
No Data Available

Violations Related to ER Care

Problems found in emergency rooms at this hospital since 2015, as identified during the investigation of a complaint. About This Data →

Violation
Full Text
COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24

Mar 28, 2017

Based on interview and record review, the hospital failed to abide by the provider's agreement that required a hospital to comply with §42 CFR 489.24, Special responsibilities of Medicare hospitals in emergency cases.

See More ↓

Based on interview and record review, the hospital failed to abide by the provider's agreement that required a hospital to comply with §42 CFR 489.24, Special responsibilities of Medicare hospitals in emergency cases. The hospital was not in compliance with the EMTALA (Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act) requirements, citing 1 of 1 patient (Patient #1) that presented in the emergency department (ED) the morning of 11/14/16 and returned to the ED the night of the same day. Findings included: Cross Refer to Tags 2406, 2407, and 2409

See Less ↑
MEDICAL SCREENING EXAM

Mar 28, 2017

Based on interview and record review the hospital failed to provide an appropriate medical screening to 1 of 1 patient (Patient #1) that presented in the emergency department (ED) the morning of 11/14/16 and returned to the ED the night of the same day.

See More ↓

Based on interview and record review the hospital failed to provide an appropriate medical screening to 1 of 1 patient (Patient #1) that presented in the emergency department (ED) the morning of 11/14/16 and returned to the ED the night of the same day. Findings included: Patient #1 presented in the ED on 11/14/16 at 11:02 AM. Personnel #11 conducted a "rapid assessment" at 11:07 AM and noted "Patient states he has fallen twice today and that his right knee keeps going out on him." The EMS (Emergency Medical Services) Patient Care Report dated 11/14/16 reflected Patient #1's chief complaint was "right knee pain/weakness and right elbow laceration." At 11:32 AM right knee x-rays were conducted as ordered. At 11:58 AM the result of the "Radiology-Knee, 3 view RT (right)...no acute findings." Physician #7 noted in the "HPI (History of Present Illness) Chief Complaint Fall, Extremity pain...Location lower extremity left, Quality aching, Severity: onset Moderate, Severity: current Moderate ..." Physician #7 did not address the problems of the right knee. At 11:05 AM Personnel #11 noted the patient was covered with feces and urine. Personnel #11 noted the EMS concerns about Patient #1's poor living conditions and that the patient was unable to take care of himself, the wife could not take care of the patient. Patient #1 needed maximum help in "moving" and with ADLs (activities of daily living). Physician #7 did not address these issues. Patient #1's current circumstances was not reported to case management. The EMS Patient Care Report dated 11/14/16 reflected Patient #1 had Diabetes. Patient #1 had a blood sugar of 414 (via finger stick). Physician #7 did not address this problem. Patient #1's blood sugar was not rechecked in the ED and there was no order for blood work. Patient #1 initially verbalized pain level of 10 in the scale of 1 to 10 (10 being the highest level of pain) during the nursing initial assessment. Personnel #11 noted the pain could be alleviated by pain medication. Physician #7 did not address Patient #1's pain management. Physician #7 did not identify Patient #1's current home medications. The medical record did not reflect Patient #1's home medications and/or if the patient was compliant with his medication regimen. In an interview on 03/27/17 at 1:50 PM and 03/28/17 at 10:00 AM, Personnel #1 was informed of the above findings and confirmed the findings.

See Less ↑
STABILIZING TREATMENT

Mar 28, 2017

Based on interview and record review the hospital failed to provide stabilizing treatment to 1 of 1 patient (Patient #1) that presented in the emergency department (ED) the morning of 11/14/16 and returned to the ED the night of the same day.

See More ↓

Based on interview and record review the hospital failed to provide stabilizing treatment to 1 of 1 patient (Patient #1) that presented in the emergency department (ED) the morning of 11/14/16 and returned to the ED the night of the same day. Findings included: Patient #1 presented in the ED on 11/14/16 at 11:02 AM. Physician #7 did not re-evaluate Patient #1. Patient #1 had unresolved issues which was noted by nursing staff. Physician #7 did not address these unresolved issues. Noted unresolved patient issues were the following: 1) Patient #1 was unable to take care of himself. His wife could not take care of him. He had problems with "moving" and needed maximum assistance. He needed help with the ADLs (activities of daily living). 2) Patient #1 lived in poor living conditions. Problems #1 and #2 were not reported to case management which was available. Case management had the ability of assisting Patient #1. 3) Patient #1 had Diabetes. The EMS Patient Care Report reflected Patient #1's blood sugar was checked in the ambulance. The result was 414 which was considered high. The blood sugar was not rechecked in the ED and/or laboratory test was not ordered for Patient #1. 4) Patient #1 had a pain level of 10 during the initial nursing assessment at 11:07 AM. Upon reassessment at 12:14 PM, Patient #1 verbalized his pain level was a 7 and could be alleviated with pain medication. There was no order for Patient #1's pain management. 5) Physician #7 did not identify Patient #1's home medications. Physician #7 did not know if Patient #1 was compliant or not with his medication regimen. There was no home medication list found in Patient #1's medical record. In an interview on 03/27/17 at 3:00 PM and 03/28/17 at 11:30 AM, Physician #7 stated the day Patient #1 presented in the ED it was very busy. He stated he "missed documenting" Patient #1's re-evaluation. Physician #7 stated he saw Patient #1 about 3 times. Physician #7 stated he did not order pain medications because more than likely Patient #1 did not want pain medications. Physician #7 stated he did not receive report from the nursing staff about the above patient issues. In an interview on 03/28/17 at 2:25 PM, Personnel #13 was asked if case management services was provided in the ED. She replied that they do. Their names, phone numbers, and daily on-call list were available at the secretary's desk. She explained if they received a report, for example like Patient #1, she would have talked to the nurse and physician to find out what was going on with the patient. She would have talked to Patient #1 and would "offer resources and explore all options in order to have a safe discharge."

See Less ↑
APPROPRIATE TRANSFER

Mar 28, 2017

Based on interview and record review the hospital failed to provide appropriate transfer/discharge of 1 of 1 patient (Patient #1) that presented in the emergency department (ED) the morning of 11/14/16 and was discharged at 2:00 PM.

See More ↓

Based on interview and record review the hospital failed to provide appropriate transfer/discharge of 1 of 1 patient (Patient #1) that presented in the emergency department (ED) the morning of 11/14/16 and was discharged at 2:00 PM. Patient #1 returned to the ED on the same day at 11:19 PM. Findings included: Patient #1 presented in the ED on 11/14/16 at 11:02 AM. The triage notes indicated "Patient states he has fallen twice today and that his right knee keeps going out on him." The initial vital signs at 11:07 AM were as follows: "BP 232/107, Pulse 102, Temp 36.5 (Celsius), Pulse Ox 96, Resp 20." At 12:12 PM Clonidine 0.2 mg tablet per oral was administered as per order. At 12:15 PM Patient #1's vital signs were as follows: BP 241/112, Pulse 101, Temp 97.8 (Fahrenheit), oxygen saturation 98% (room air), and respiration 20. At 12:37 PM Clonidine 0.1 mg tablet per oral was ordered by Physician #7. At 1:08 PM Patient #1's vital signs were as follows: BP 167/80, Pulse 69, Temperature 97.7 (Fahrenheit), oxygen saturation 95% (room air), and respiration 20. At 1:12 PM Personnel #11 held the "Clonidine 0.1 mg tablet per oral due to BP Low, last BP: 167/80 11/14/16 1:08 PM." Besides blood pressure problems, Patient #1 had other medical and social issues that were unresolved during his ED stay. Hereunder were the unresolved treatment and issues prior to discharge at 2:00 PM on 11/14/16: 1) Patient #1 did not receive a re-evaluation from Physician #7. 2) Patient #1 had Diabetes and had a blood sugar level of 141 which obtained in the ambulance. The blood sugar was not rechecked in the ED and/or blood work was not ordered for Patient #1. 3) Patient #1 had a pain level of 10 on a pain scale of 1 to10 during the initial nursing assessment at 11:07 AM. Upon reassessment at 12:14 PM, Patient #1 verbalized his pain level was a 7 and could be alleviated with pain medication. There was no order for Patient #1's pain management. 4) Physician #7 did not identify Patient #1's home medications. Physician #7 did not know if Patient #1 was compliant or not with his medication regimen for hypertension or Diabetes Mellitus. There was no home medication list found in Patient #1's medical record. 5) Patient #1 was unable to take care of himself. He had problems with moving around and needed maximum assistance. Patient #1 lived in poor living conditions. Patient #1 needed help with his activities of daily living. All these issues were not reported to case management which was available. Per ED log, Patient #1 returned to the ED on 11/14/16 at 11:19 PM via ambulance for "change mental/neuro stat" complaint. The "Primary Impression" was "malignant hypertension" and was subsequently admitted . In an interview on 03/27/17 at 3:00 PM and 03/28/17 at 11:30 AM, Physician #7 stated the day Patient #1 presented in the ED it was very busy. He stated he "missed documenting" Patient #1's re-evaluation. Physician #7 stated he saw Patient #1 about 3 times. Physician #7 stated he did not order pain medications because more than likely Patient #1 did not want pain medications. Physician #7 stated he did not receive report from the nursing staff about the above patient issues. In an interview on 03/28/17 at 2:25 PM, Personnel #13 was asked if case management services was provided in the ED. She replied that they do. Their names, phone numbers, and daily on-call list were available at the secretary's desk. She explained if they received a report, for example like Patient #1, she would have talked to the nurse and physician to find out what was going on with the patient. She would have talked to Patient #1 and would "offer resources and explore all options in order to have a safe discharge."

See Less ↑
Notes

“Average time” refers to the median wait time (the midpoint of all patients' wait times). References to “doctor or medical practitioner” indicate a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. CMS reports the CT scan quality measure as the percentage of patients who received a scan within 45 minutes. We have reversed that measure so that all measures follow a “lower is better” pattern.

Additional design and development by Mike Tigas and Sisi Wei.

Sources

All data comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Detailed quality measures at the hospital, state and national level were last updated September 2019. Most data was collected between October 2017 and October 2018. Data on ER-related violations is from January 2015 to June 2019.

Additional Info

How We've Updated ER Inspector | Download ProPublica's Emergency Room Planning Toolkit | About This Data

Don’t See Your ER?

In some cases we aren’t able to identify the exact location of a hospital, so it doesn’t appear on our mapped search results. However, it may still be in our database – try looking for it in the list of hospitals on each state's page.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from our database because it doesn't have an emergency department.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from the federal government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data. There are a couple of reasons why a hospital isn’t included in CMS data: it may not participate in Medicare, or it may share a certification number with another hospital (common across large hospital systems).

If you notice a hospital missing from our database, please first check if you can find it on CMS' website, and that it is listed as having an ER. If so, please email us with the hospital name and address.