ER Inspector MAYO CLINIC HLTH SYSTM FRANCISCAN HLTHCARE SPARTAMAYO CLINIC HLTH SYSTM FRANCISCAN HLTHCARE SPARTA

ER Inspector

Find and Evaluate Every Emergency Room Near You

Updated September 19, 2019

This database was last updated in September 2019. It should only be used as a historical snapshot.Researchers can find more recent data on timely and effective care in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ hospitals datasets and guidance about hospital regulations.

If you are having a heart attack or life-threatening emergency, call 911.

ER Inspector » Wisconsin » MAYO CLINIC HLTH SYSTM FRANCISCAN HLTHCARE SPARTA

Don’t see your ER? Find out why it might be missing.

MAYO CLINIC HLTH SYSTM FRANCISCAN HLTHCARE SPARTA

310 w main st, sparta, Wis. 54656

(608) 269-2132

79% of Patients Would "Definitely Recommend" this Hospital
(Wis. Avg: 76%)

2 violations related to ER care since 2015

Hospital Type

Critical Access Hospitals

Hospital Owner

Voluntary non-profit - Church

ER Volume

Low (0 - 20K patients a year)

See this hospital's CMS profile page or inspection reports.

Patient Pathways Through This ER

After a patient arrives at the emergency room, they are typically seen by a doctor or medical practitioner and then either sent home or admitted to the hospital and taken to a room. A small percentage of patients leave without being seen. The chart below shows on average how long each of these pathways take. Lower numbers are better, and all times refer to the average length of time people waited.

Arrives at ER
1% of patients leave without being seen
3hrs 22min Admitted to hospital
4hrs 31min Taken to room
1hr 11min Sent home

All wait times are average.

Detailed Quality Measures

Here is a more in depth look at each quality measure, compared to state and national averages for hospitals with low ER volumes. Experts caution that very small differences between hospitals for a given measure are unlikely to correspond to noticeable differences in the real world.

Measure
Average for this Hospital
How this Hospital Compares

(to other hospitals with similar
ER volumes, when available)

Discharged Patients
Time Until Sent Home

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being sent home (if not admitted).

1hr 11min
National Avg.
1hr 53min
Wis. Avg.
1hr 58min
This Hospital
1hr 11min
Impatient Patients
Left Without
Being Seen

Percentage of patients who left the emergency room without being seen by a doctor or medical practitioner.

1%
Avg. U.S. Hospital
2%
Avg. Wis. Hospital
1%
This Hospital
1%
Admitted Patients
Time Before Admission

Average time patients spent in the emergency room before being admitted to the hospital.

3hrs 22min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
3hrs 30min
Wis. Avg.
3hrs 16min
This Hospital
3hrs 22min
Admitted Patients
Transfer Time

Among patients admitted, additional time they spent waiting before being taken to their room (sometimes referred to as "boarding time.")

1hr 9min

Data submitted were based on a sample of cases/patients.

National Avg.
57min
Wis. Avg.
54min
This Hospital
1hr 9min
Special Patients
CT Scan

Percentage of patients who arrived with stroke symptoms and did not receive brain scan results within 45 mins.

No Data Available

The number of cases/patients is too few to report.

National Avg.
27%
Wis. Avg.
25%
This Hospital
No Data Available

Violations Related to ER Care

Problems found in emergency rooms at this hospital since 2015, as identified during the investigation of a complaint. About This Data →

Violation
Full Text
COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24

Jun 22, 2015

Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure compliance with EMTALA Regulation 489.24 in that the facility failed to appropriately transfer 2 of 20 patients (Pt.

See More ↓

Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure compliance with EMTALA Regulation 489.24 in that the facility failed to appropriately transfer 2 of 20 patients (Pt. #1 and Pt. #2). Failure to appropriately transfer has the potential to affect all patients presenting in an emergency. See findings: The hospital failed to appropriately transfer. See A 2409.

See Less ↑
APPROPRIATE TRANSFER

Jun 22, 2015

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure appropriate transfer of patients.

See More ↓

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure appropriate transfer of patients. In 2 of 20 records reviewed (#1 and #2) the receiving hospital was not contacted before transfer. This deficiency has the potential to affect all patients served by the emergency department. Findings include: Hospital policy entitled; "Transfer Guideline for Patient Transfer to Another Facility- Sparta" dated 02/11/15 states; "Provider responsibilities: a. The provider initiating the transfer must contact the receiving facility to obtain consent for transfer and determine an accepting provider. i. No patient is transferred until receiving facility consents to accept the patient. ii. The provider documents the information on the Physician Certification of Need for Transfer form." Per review of the MR of pt. #1 and #2 on 06/22/15 at 11:00 AM both pt. #1 and pt. #2 presented with road rash from a motorcycle crash. Pt. #1 and #2's injuries were the equivalent of second degree burns. MD A completed transfer forms dated 06/12/15 at 7:40 PM for both pt. #1 and pt. #2, the receiving facility is documented as "Madison Regional Burn Center" and the accepting physician is documented as Dr. B. There is no phone number of the receiving facility listed on either transfer form although a space is designated for this phone number. According to the ambulance report for pt. #1's trip from the sending hospital to the receiving hospital there was no contact between the two hospitals. The ambulance report narrative states; "Upon arrival at (the receiving hospital), ER (emergency room ) charge nurse advised that there was no records of patient any where in the (hospital's) system. EMS provided charge RN with name of accepting provider. ER charge RN advised that no such provider existed any where in the (receiving) hospital system.".... "EMS called (sending hospital's) ER in attempt to problem solve the situation. ER RN provided EMS with number that ER MD (A) had used to arrange for an accepting physician. Upon looking up phone number, it was learned that phone number was for the Burn Center at (another hospital). Upon further investigation by ER charge RN it was learned that at (this other hospital) there was a burn physician (B) with the name listed on EMS paperwork. EMS advised (receiving hospital) ER staff that there was a second patient (pt. #2) coming in another ambulance that was in the same dilemma. ER staff advised that they would see and evaluate patient's and treat and manage them appropriately." Per phone interview with MD A on 06/23/15 at 4:00 PM A asked the operator to be connected the burn unit at the receiving hospital. A stated A was connected with another hospital and neither A or the physician at the other hospital realized they were talking to the wrong physician at a completely different hospital.

See Less ↑
Notes

“Average time” refers to the median wait time (the midpoint of all patients' wait times). References to “doctor or medical practitioner” indicate a doctor, nurse practitioner or physician's assistant. CMS reports the CT scan quality measure as the percentage of patients who received a scan within 45 minutes. We have reversed that measure so that all measures follow a “lower is better” pattern.

Additional design and development by Mike Tigas and Sisi Wei.

Sources

All data comes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Detailed quality measures at the hospital, state and national level were last updated September 2019. Most data was collected between October 2017 and October 2018. Data on ER-related violations is from January 2015 to June 2019.

Additional Info

How We've Updated ER Inspector | Download ProPublica's Emergency Room Planning Toolkit | About This Data

Don’t See Your ER?

In some cases we aren’t able to identify the exact location of a hospital, so it doesn’t appear on our mapped search results. However, it may still be in our database – try looking for it in the list of hospitals on each state's page.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from our database because it doesn't have an emergency department.

In other cases, the hospital is missing from the federal government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data. There are a couple of reasons why a hospital isn’t included in CMS data: it may not participate in Medicare, or it may share a certification number with another hospital (common across large hospital systems).

If you notice a hospital missing from our database, please first check if you can find it on CMS' website, and that it is listed as having an ER. If so, please email us with the hospital name and address.