Last updated on Oct. 31, 2015

This database was last updated in November 2015 and should only be used as a historical snapshot.

Rep. Kay Granger

R-Tex., 12th District. Member since 1997. Website | Facebook

6.7%
votes missed
460 out of 6,906
17.0%
misses explained
78 out of 460
0
mistakes

Kay Granger ranks 91st in votes missed of the 434 voting lawmakers in the current Congress, which began this year.

Most Common Explanation Types

ProPublica categorized the many reasons members gave for missing votes. Of these explanations —which are not mandatory— half of all explanations are unclear, simply restating the absence. Also commonly cited are personal and family obligations, and ill health.
43
Ambiguous or no reason
28
Medical matter
4
Official business

Types of Votes Explained

We classified votes into three categories: On amendments to bills, which are numerous and can be voted on very quickly; on bills considered “under suspension of the rules,” which are usually uncontroversial and require two-thirds support for passage, and on “floor votes,” which include votes “on passage” and require a simple majority for approval.
48
Floor Votes
19
Suspension of the Rules
11
Amendments

Close Votes Missed

  • Not Voting
  • Voted “present”

H R 2499, 2010 (vote 241)

50%
yes no
194
198

Puerto Rico Democracy Act

H R 3082, 2010 (vote 622)

50%
yes no
212
206

Making appropriations for military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes

H R 2642, 2013 (vote 546)

50%
yes no
195
204

Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act

H R 2016, 2008 (vote 173)

50%
yes no
208
212

National Landscape Conservation System Act

H R 4847, 2008 (vote 159)

50%
yes no
205
209

United States Fire Administration Reauthorization Act

H RES 1756, 2010 (vote 623)

50%
yes no
211
208

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 5281) to amend title 28, United States Code, to clarify and improve certain provisions relating to the removal of litigation against Federal officers or agencies to Federal courts, and for other pusposes

H RES 1755, 2010 (vote 619)

50%
yes no
207
206

Providing for consideration of H.R. 3082, making appropriations for military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes

All Vote Explanations

Date Vote Roll Call Title Reason
May 11, 2010 No House vote 242 On Passage, H R 2499 Ambiguous or no reason
May 11, 2010 Aye House vote 241 On Motion to Recommit with Instructions, H R 2499 Ambiguous or no reason
Dec. 11, 2009 Yes House vote 946 On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended, H R 86 Ambiguous or no reason
Dec. 11, 2009 No House vote 945 On Agreeing to the Resolution, H RES 956 Ambiguous or no reason
Dec. 11, 2009 Yes House vote 944 On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended, H R 3603 Ambiguous or no reason
Dec. 11, 2009 No House vote 943 On Passage, H R 4213 Ambiguous or no reason
Dec. 11, 2009 No House vote 942 Table Appeal of the Ruling of the Chair, H R 4213 Ambiguous or no reason
Dec. 11, 2009 Yes House vote 941 On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, H R 3951 Ambiguous or no reason
Dec. 11, 2009 No House vote 940 On Agreeing to the Resolution, H RES 955 Ambiguous or no reason
Dec. 11, 2009 No House vote 939 On Ordering the Previous Question, H RES 955 Ambiguous or no reason